From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
ncardwell@google.com, soheil@google.com, priyarjha@google.com,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 7/8] tcp: new helper tcp_rack_skb_timeout
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:40:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180516234017.172775-8-ycheng@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180516234017.172775-1-ycheng@google.com>
Create and export a new helper tcp_rack_skb_timeout and move tcp_is_rack
to prepare the final RTO change.
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@google.com>
---
include/net/tcp.h | 2 ++
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 10 +++++-----
net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c | 9 +++++++--
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 402484ed9b57..b46d0f9adbdb 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -1880,6 +1880,8 @@ void tcp_init(void);
/* tcp_recovery.c */
void tcp_mark_skb_lost(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
void tcp_newreno_mark_lost(struct sock *sk, bool snd_una_advanced);
+extern s32 tcp_rack_skb_timeout(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ u32 reo_wnd);
extern void tcp_rack_mark_lost(struct sock *sk);
extern void tcp_rack_advance(struct tcp_sock *tp, u8 sacked, u32 end_seq,
u64 xmit_time);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 1ccc97b368c7..ba8a8e3464aa 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1917,6 +1917,11 @@ static inline void tcp_init_undo(struct tcp_sock *tp)
tp->undo_retrans = tp->retrans_out ? : -1;
}
+static bool tcp_is_rack(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_recovery & TCP_RACK_LOSS_DETECTION;
+}
+
/* If we detect SACK reneging, forget all SACK information
* and reset tags completely, otherwise preserve SACKs. If receiver
* dropped its ofo queue, we will know this due to reneging detection.
@@ -2031,11 +2036,6 @@ static inline int tcp_dupack_heuristics(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
return tp->sacked_out + 1;
}
-static bool tcp_is_rack(const struct sock *sk)
-{
- return sock_net(sk)->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_recovery & TCP_RACK_LOSS_DETECTION;
-}
-
/* Linux NewReno/SACK/ECN state machine.
* --------------------------------------
*
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
index b2f9be388bf3..30cbfb69b1de 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
@@ -47,6 +47,12 @@ u32 tcp_rack_reo_wnd(const struct sock *sk)
tp->srtt_us >> 3);
}
+s32 tcp_rack_skb_timeout(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 reo_wnd)
+{
+ return tp->rack.rtt_us + reo_wnd -
+ tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp, skb->skb_mstamp);
+}
+
/* RACK loss detection (IETF draft draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-01):
*
* Marks a packet lost, if some packet sent later has been (s)acked.
@@ -92,8 +98,7 @@ static void tcp_rack_detect_loss(struct sock *sk, u32 *reo_timeout)
/* A packet is lost if it has not been s/acked beyond
* the recent RTT plus the reordering window.
*/
- remaining = tp->rack.rtt_us + reo_wnd -
- tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp, skb->skb_mstamp);
+ remaining = tcp_rack_skb_timeout(tp, skb, reo_wnd);
if (remaining <= 0) {
tcp_mark_skb_lost(sk, skb);
list_del_init(&skb->tcp_tsorted_anchor);
--
2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 23:40 [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: default RACK loss recovery Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] tcp: support DUPACK threshold in RACK Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] tcp: disable RFC6675 loss detection Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] tcp: simpler NewReno implementation Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] tcp: account lost retransmit after timeout Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] tcp: new helper tcp_timeout_mark_lost Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] tcp: separate loss marking and state update on RTO Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` Yuchung Cheng [this message]
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] tcp: don't mark recently sent packets lost " Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-17 19:45 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: default RACK loss recovery David Miller
2018-05-21 18:39 ` hiren panchasara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180516234017.172775-8-ycheng@google.com \
--to=ycheng@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=priyarjha@google.com \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox