From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] PTP: add support for one-shot output
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:16:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911061622.774006-2-felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190911061622.774006-1-felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Some controllers allow for a one-shot output pulse, in contrast to
periodic output. Now that we have extensible versions of our IOCTLs, we
can finally make use of the 'flags' field to pass a bit telling driver
that if we want one-shot pulse output.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v3:
- Remove bogus bitwise negation
Changes since v2:
- Add _PEROUT_ to bit macro
Changes since v1:
- remove comment from .flags field
include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h b/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h
index 9a0af3511b68..f16301015949 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@
/*
* Bits of the ptp_perout_request.flags field:
*/
-#define PTP_PEROUT_VALID_FLAGS (0)
-
+#define PTP_PEROUT_ONE_SHOT (1<<0)
+#define PTP_PEROUT_VALID_FLAGS (PTP_PEROUT_ONE_SHOT)
/*
* struct ptp_clock_time - represents a time value
*
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ struct ptp_perout_request {
struct ptp_clock_time start; /* Absolute start time. */
struct ptp_clock_time period; /* Desired period, zero means disable. */
unsigned int index; /* Which channel to configure. */
- unsigned int flags; /* Reserved for future use. */
+ unsigned int flags;
unsigned int rsv[4]; /* Reserved for future use. */
};
--
2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-11 6:16 [PATCH v4 1/2] PTP: introduce new versions of IOCTLs Felipe Balbi
2019-09-11 6:16 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2019-09-12 16:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PTP: add support for one-shot output Richard Cochran
2019-09-12 17:01 ` David Miller
2019-09-13 13:57 ` David Miller
2019-09-24 19:23 ` Keller, Jacob E
2019-09-24 20:23 ` Hall, Christopher S
2019-09-24 21:16 ` Keller, Jacob E
2019-09-24 21:53 ` Keller, Jacob E
2019-09-13 13:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PTP: introduce new versions of IOCTLs David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911061622.774006-2-felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--to=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christopher.s.hall@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox