From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.ibm.com>
To: Lijun Pan <ljp@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
drt@linux.ibm.com, tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] ibmvnic: complete dev->poll nicely during adapter reset
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 10:41:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210305184157.GA1411314@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210305074456.88015-1-ljp@linux.ibm.com>
Lijun Pan [ljp@linux.ibm.com] wrote:
> The reset path will call ibmvnic_cleanup->ibmvnic_napi_disable
> ->napi_disable(). This is supposed to stop the polling.
> Commit 21ecba6c48f9 ("ibmvnic: Exit polling routine correctly
> during adapter reset") reported that the during device reset,
> polling routine never completed and napi_disable slept indefinitely.
> In order to solve that problem, resetting bit was checked and
> napi_complete_done was called before dev->poll::ibmvnic_poll exited.
>
> Checking for resetting bit in dev->poll is racy because resetting
> bit may be false while being checked, but turns true immediately
> afterwards.
Yes, have been testing a fix for that.
>
> Hence we call napi_complete in ibmvnic_napi_disable, which avoids
> the racing with resetting, and makes sure dev->poll and napi_disalbe
napi_complete() will prevent a new call to ibmvnic_poll() but what if
ibmvnic_poll() is already executing and attempting to access the scrqs
while the reset path is freeing them?
Sukadev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-05 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 7:44 [RFC PATCH net] ibmvnic: complete dev->poll nicely during adapter reset Lijun Pan
2021-03-05 18:41 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2021-03-05 18:52 ` Lijun Pan
2021-03-05 19:05 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210305184157.GA1411314@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ljp@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox