From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.ibm.com>
To: Lijun Pan <lijunp213@gmail.com>
Cc: Lijun Pan <ljp@linux.ibm.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Dany Madden <drt@linux.ibm.com>,
tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] ibmvnic: complete dev->poll nicely during adapter reset
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 11:05:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210305190530.GB1411314@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOhMmr6cbrnX_j3Hgwpbgt_Ou7UtkgJRToCTjuq5hTPPjrwnrw@mail.gmail.com>
Lijun Pan [lijunp213@gmail.com] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:44 PM Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> <sukadev@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Lijun Pan [ljp@linux.ibm.com] wrote:
> > > The reset path will call ibmvnic_cleanup->ibmvnic_napi_disable
> > > ->napi_disable(). This is supposed to stop the polling.
> > > Commit 21ecba6c48f9 ("ibmvnic: Exit polling routine correctly
> > > during adapter reset") reported that the during device reset,
> > > polling routine never completed and napi_disable slept indefinitely.
> > > In order to solve that problem, resetting bit was checked and
> > > napi_complete_done was called before dev->poll::ibmvnic_poll exited.
> > >
> > > Checking for resetting bit in dev->poll is racy because resetting
> > > bit may be false while being checked, but turns true immediately
> > > afterwards.
> >
> > Yes, have been testing a fix for that.
> > >
> > > Hence we call napi_complete in ibmvnic_napi_disable, which avoids
> > > the racing with resetting, and makes sure dev->poll and napi_disalbe
> >
> > napi_complete() will prevent a new call to ibmvnic_poll() but what if
> > ibmvnic_poll() is already executing and attempting to access the scrqs
> > while the reset path is freeing them?
> >
> napi_complete() and napi_disable() are called in the earlier stages of
> reset path, i.e. before reset path actually calls the functions to
> freeing scrqs.
Yes, those will prevent a _new_ call to poll right?
But what if poll is already executing? What prevents it from accessing
an scrq that the reset path will free?
> So I don't think this is a issue here.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-05 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 7:44 [RFC PATCH net] ibmvnic: complete dev->poll nicely during adapter reset Lijun Pan
2021-03-05 18:41 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-03-05 18:52 ` Lijun Pan
2021-03-05 19:05 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210305190530.GB1411314@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lijunp213@gmail.com \
--cc=ljp@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox