* [net v2] tcp: Specify cmsgbuf is user pointer for receive zerocopy.
@ 2021-05-06 19:06 Arjun Roy
2021-05-06 19:17 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arjun Roy @ 2021-05-06 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, netdev; +Cc: arjunroy, edumazet, soheil
From: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com>
A prior change (1f466e1f15cf) introduces separate handling for
->msg_control depending on whether the pointer is a kernel or user
pointer. However, while tcp receive zerocopy is using this field, it
is not properly annotating that the buffer in this case is a user
pointer. This can cause faults when the improper mechanism is used
within put_cmsg().
This patch simply annotates tcp receive zerocopy's use as explicitly
being a user pointer.
Fixes: 7eeba1706eba ("tcp: Add receive timestamp support for receive zerocopy.")
Signed-off-by: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com>
---
Changelog since v1:
- Updated "Fixes" tag and commit message to properly account for which
commit introduced buggy behaviour.
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index e14fd0c50c10..f1c1f9e3de72 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2039,6 +2039,7 @@ static void tcp_zc_finalize_rx_tstamp(struct sock *sk,
(__kernel_size_t)zc->msg_controllen;
cmsg_dummy.msg_flags = in_compat_syscall()
? MSG_CMSG_COMPAT : 0;
+ cmsg_dummy.msg_control_is_user = true;
zc->msg_flags = 0;
if (zc->msg_control == msg_control_addr &&
zc->msg_controllen == cmsg_dummy.msg_controllen) {
--
2.31.1.607.g51e8a6a459-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [net v2] tcp: Specify cmsgbuf is user pointer for receive zerocopy.
2021-05-06 19:06 [net v2] tcp: Specify cmsgbuf is user pointer for receive zerocopy Arjun Roy
@ 2021-05-06 19:17 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2021-05-06 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arjun Roy; +Cc: David Miller, netdev, Arjun Roy, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 9:06 PM Arjun Roy <arjunroy.kdev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com>
>
> A prior change (1f466e1f15cf) introduces separate handling for
> ->msg_control depending on whether the pointer is a kernel or user
> pointer. However, while tcp receive zerocopy is using this field, it
> is not properly annotating that the buffer in this case is a user
> pointer. This can cause faults when the improper mechanism is used
> within put_cmsg().
>
> This patch simply annotates tcp receive zerocopy's use as explicitly
> being a user pointer.
>
> Fixes: 7eeba1706eba ("tcp: Add receive timestamp support for receive zerocopy.")
> Signed-off-by: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> ---
>
> Changelog since v1:
> - Updated "Fixes" tag and commit message to properly account for which
> commit introduced buggy behaviour.
>
> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index e14fd0c50c10..f1c1f9e3de72 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -2039,6 +2039,7 @@ static void tcp_zc_finalize_rx_tstamp(struct sock *sk,
> (__kernel_size_t)zc->msg_controllen;
> cmsg_dummy.msg_flags = in_compat_syscall()
> ? MSG_CMSG_COMPAT : 0;
> + cmsg_dummy.msg_control_is_user = true;
> zc->msg_flags = 0;
> if (zc->msg_control == msg_control_addr &&
> zc->msg_controllen == cmsg_dummy.msg_controllen) {
> --
> 2.31.1.607.g51e8a6a459-goog
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-06 19:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-06 19:06 [net v2] tcp: Specify cmsgbuf is user pointer for receive zerocopy Arjun Roy
2021-05-06 19:17 ` Eric Dumazet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox