From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, vivien.didelot@gmail.com,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, ceggers@arri.de,
Tristram.Ha@microchip.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Woojung.Huh@microchip.com,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 07/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add packet reception timestamping
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 12:38:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221207103808.nfkvr2hwv5yud4uc@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148ee662f8def0e63b81d9164d2fd7c0f7029cf7.camel@microchip.com>
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 06:00:27AM +0000, Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com wrote:
> I looked into the sja1105 and hellcreek rxtstamp() implementation.
> Here, SKB is queued in rxtstamp() and ptp_schedule_worker is started.
> In the work queue, skb is dequeued and current ptp hardware clock is
> read. Using the partial time stamp and phc clock, absolute time stamp
> is calculated and posted.
> In this KSZ implementation, ptp_schedule_worker is used for maintaining
> the ptp software clock which read value from hardware clock every
> second for faster access of clock value.
>
> Based on the above observation, I have doubt on how to implement. Below
> are the algorithm. Kindly suggest which one to proceed.
> 1. Remove the existing ptp software clock mainpulation using
> ptp_schedule_worker. Instead in the ptp_schedule_worker, dequeue the
> skb and timestamp the rx packets by directly reading from the ptp
> hardware clock.
> 2. Keep the existing implementation, add the rxtstamp() where it will
> not queue skb instead just process the timestamping with using software
> clock and KSZ_SKB_CB()->tstamp.
Search more, you'll find felix_rxtstamp() which is closer to (2) and to
what you need. There, reading the 64-bit PTP time is done in NET_RX
softirq context because the register access is over MMIO. That might
change in the future with the introduction of the SPI controlled VSC7512,
but for now it is a good example.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-07 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-06 9:14 [Patch net-next v2 00/13] net: dsa: microchip: add PTP support for KSZ9563/KSZ8563 and LAN937x Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 01/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add the posix clock support Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 10:37 ` Christian Eggers
2022-12-06 10:48 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-07 4:26 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 02/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: Initial hardware time stamping support Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 03/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add 4 bytes in tail tag when ptp enabled Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 04/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: manipulating absolute time using ptp hw clock Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 05/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: enable interrupt for timestamping Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 06/13] net: ptp: add helper for one-step P2P clocks Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 16:38 ` Richard Cochran
2022-12-07 4:15 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-12-07 10:33 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 07/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add packet reception timestamping Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 12:53 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-07 6:00 ` Arun.Ramadoss
2022-12-07 10:38 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 08/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add packet transmission timestamping Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 09/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: move pdelay_rsp correction field to tail tag Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 10/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add periodic output signal Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 11/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: add support for perout programmable pins Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 12/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: lan937x: add 2 step timestamping Arun Ramadoss
2022-12-06 9:14 ` [Patch net-next v2 13/13] net: dsa: microchip: ptp: lan937x: Enable periodic output in LED pins Arun Ramadoss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221207103808.nfkvr2hwv5yud4uc@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com \
--cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=Woojung.Huh@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ceggers@arri.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox