public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>, <daniel.machon@microchip.com>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: lan966x: Add ptp trap rules
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 15:57:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221209145720.ahjmercylzqo5tla@soft-dev3-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221209144328.m54ksmoeitmcjo5f@skbuf>

The 12/09/2022 16:43, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 03:20:58PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > On ocelot, the vcap is enabled at port initialization, while on other
> > platforms(lan966x and sparx5) you have the option to enable or disable.
> 
> Even if that wasn't the case, I'd still consider enabling/disabling VCAP
> lookups privately in the ocelot driver when there are non-tc users of
> traps, instead of requiring users to do anything with tc.

I was thinking also about this, such the ptp to enable the VCAP
privately. But then the issue would be if a user adds entries using tc
and then start ptp, then suddently the rules that were added using tc
could be hit. That is the reason why expected the user to enable the
tcam manually.

> It's simply too unfriendly for somebody who just wants PTP. You can use
> devlink traps to show which non-tc traps are active.

-- 
/Horatiu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-09 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-03 10:43 [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: lan966x: Enable PTP on bridge interfaces Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-03 10:43 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] net: microchip: vcap: Add vcap_get_rule Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-06 12:31   ` Paolo Abeni
2022-12-07  8:30     ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-03 10:43 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] net: microchip: vcap: Add vcap_mod_rule Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-03 10:43 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: microchip: vcap: Add vcap_rule_get_key_u32 Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-03 10:43 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: lan966x: Add ptp trap rules Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-08  9:25   ` Michael Walle
2022-12-08  9:27     ` Michael Walle
2022-12-08 13:04       ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-08 13:18         ` Michael Walle
2022-12-09  9:29           ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 12:10             ` Michael Walle
2022-12-09 12:58               ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 12:56                 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 14:05                   ` Michael Walle
2022-12-09 14:14                     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 14:20                     ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 14:23                       ` Michael Walle
2022-12-09 14:54                         ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 14:43                       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 14:47                         ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 14:57                         ` Horatiu Vultur [this message]
2022-12-09 14:56                           ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 15:30                             ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-09 15:27                               ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-12-09 23:03                                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-12 14:27                                   ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-12 14:20                                 ` Horatiu Vultur
2023-01-05 15:09             ` Michael Walle
2023-01-05 21:55               ` Horatiu Vultur
2022-12-06 12:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: lan966x: Enable PTP on bridge interfaces patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221209145720.ahjmercylzqo5tla@soft-dev3-1 \
    --to=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox