Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/12] net: enetc: set next_to_clean/next_to_use just from enetc_setup_txbdr()
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 01:02:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230117230234.2950873-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230117230234.2950873-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

enetc_alloc_txbdr() deals with allocating resources necessary for a TX
ring to work (the array of software BDs and the array of TSO headers).

The next_to_clean and next_to_use pointers are overwritten with proper
values which are read from hardware here:

enetc_open
-> enetc_alloc_tx_resources
   -> enetc_alloc_txbdr
      -> set to zero
-> enetc_setup_bdrs
   -> enetc_setup_txbdr
      -> read from hardware

So their initialization with zeroes is pointless and confusing.
Delete it.

Consequently, since enetc_setup_txbdr() has no opposite cleanup
function, also delete the resetting of these indices from
enetc_free_tx_ring().

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
index 5ad0b259e623..911686df16e4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
@@ -1753,9 +1753,6 @@ static int enetc_alloc_txbdr(struct enetc_bdr *txr)
 		goto err_alloc_tso;
 	}
 
-	txr->next_to_clean = 0;
-	txr->next_to_use = 0;
-
 	return 0;
 
 err_alloc_tso:
@@ -1897,9 +1894,6 @@ static void enetc_free_tx_ring(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring)
 
 		enetc_free_tx_frame(tx_ring, tx_swbd);
 	}
-
-	tx_ring->next_to_clean = 0;
-	tx_ring->next_to_use = 0;
 }
 
 static void enetc_free_rx_ring(struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring)
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-17 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-17 23:02 [PATCH net-next 00/12] ENETC BD ring cleanup Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] net: enetc: set up RX ring indices from enetc_setup_rxbdr() Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] net: enetc: create enetc_dma_free_bdr() Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] net: enetc: rx_swbd and tx_swbd are never NULL in enetc_free_rxtx_rings() Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] net: enetc: drop redundant enetc_free_tx_frame() call from enetc_free_txbdr() Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] net: enetc: bring "bool extended" to top-level in enetc_open() Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] net: enetc: split ring resource allocation from assignment Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] net: enetc: move phylink_start/stop out of enetc_start/stop Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] net: enetc: implement ring reconfiguration procedure for PTP RX timestamping Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-18 10:51   ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] net: enetc: rename "xdp" and "dev" in enetc_setup_bpf() Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] net: enetc: set up XDP program under enetc_reconfigure() Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-17 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] net: enetc: prioritize ability to go down over packet processing Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-19  5:10 ` [PATCH net-next 00/12] ENETC BD ring cleanup patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230117230234.2950873-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox