From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>,
Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>,
Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with its children
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 21:33:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230531183323.eozihhbax4tzho6w@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531182758.5u5hv5leobeinxih@skbuf>
Has anyone received this message? I guess at least vger and kuba@kernel.org
rejected it, because I got this bounce email:
kernel.org suspects your message is spam and rejected it.
Error:
550 5.7.350 Remote server returned message detected as spam -> 554 5.7.1
Service unavailable; Helo command [EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com]
blocked using dbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver;
https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/34.216.226.155
Message rejected by: smtp.kernel.org
Interestingly, if I click the link above, it says "This is not due to an
issue with your email set-up", so I'm not sure what to believe...
----- Forwarded message from Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> -----
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 20:39:23 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@google.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@redhat.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>, Cong Wang
<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Vinicius Costa
Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli
<muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>, Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>,
Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with
its children
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
Prompted by Vinicius' request to consolidate some child Qdisc
dereferences in taprio:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87edmxv7x2.fsf@intel.com/
I remembered that I had left some unfinished work in this Qdisc, namely
commit af7b29b1deaa ("Revert "net/sched: taprio: make qdisc_leaf() see
the per-netdev-queue pfifo child qdiscs"").
This patch set represents another stab at, essentially, what's in the
title. Not only does taprio not properly detect when it's grafted as a
non-root qdisc, but it also returns incorrect per-class stats.
Eventually, Vinicius' request is addressed too, although in a different
form than the one he requested (which was purely cosmetic).
Review from people more experienced with Qdiscs than me would be
appreciated. I tried my best to explain what I consider to be problems.
I am deliberately targeting net-next because the changes are too
invasive for net - they were reverted from stable once already.
Vladimir Oltean (5):
net/sched: taprio: don't access q->qdiscs[] in unoffloaded mode during
attach()
net/sched: taprio: keep child Qdisc refcount elevated at 2 in offload
mode
net/sched: taprio: try again to report q->qdiscs[] to qdisc_leaf()
net/sched: taprio: delete misleading comment about preallocating child
qdiscs
net/sched: taprio: dump class stats for the actual q->qdiscs[]
net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
----- End forwarded message -----
next parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-31 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230531182758.5u5hv5leobeinxih@skbuf>
2023-05-31 18:33 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2023-06-01 6:06 ` Failed delivery to smtp.kernel.org: blocked using dbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver; (was: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with its children) Paul Menzel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230531183323.eozihhbax4tzho6w@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pctammela@mojatatu.com \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox