* [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with its children [not found] <20230531182758.5u5hv5leobeinxih@skbuf> @ 2023-05-31 18:33 ` Vladimir Oltean 2023-06-01 6:06 ` Failed delivery to smtp.kernel.org: blocked using dbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver; (was: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with its children) Paul Menzel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Vladimir Oltean @ 2023-05-31 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Jamal Hadi Salim, Cong Wang, Jiri Pirko, Vinicius Costa Gomes, linux-kernel, intel-wired-lan, Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli, Peilin Ye, Pedro Tammela Has anyone received this message? I guess at least vger and kuba@kernel.org rejected it, because I got this bounce email: kernel.org suspects your message is spam and rejected it. Error: 550 5.7.350 Remote server returned message detected as spam -> 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Helo command [EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com] blocked using dbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver; https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/34.216.226.155 Message rejected by: smtp.kernel.org Interestingly, if I click the link above, it says "This is not due to an issue with your email set-up", so I'm not sure what to believe... ----- Forwarded message from Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> ----- Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 20:39:23 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>, Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>, Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com> Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with its children X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Prompted by Vinicius' request to consolidate some child Qdisc dereferences in taprio: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87edmxv7x2.fsf@intel.com/ I remembered that I had left some unfinished work in this Qdisc, namely commit af7b29b1deaa ("Revert "net/sched: taprio: make qdisc_leaf() see the per-netdev-queue pfifo child qdiscs""). This patch set represents another stab at, essentially, what's in the title. Not only does taprio not properly detect when it's grafted as a non-root qdisc, but it also returns incorrect per-class stats. Eventually, Vinicius' request is addressed too, although in a different form than the one he requested (which was purely cosmetic). Review from people more experienced with Qdiscs than me would be appreciated. I tried my best to explain what I consider to be problems. I am deliberately targeting net-next because the changes are too invasive for net - they were reverted from stable once already. Vladimir Oltean (5): net/sched: taprio: don't access q->qdiscs[] in unoffloaded mode during attach() net/sched: taprio: keep child Qdisc refcount elevated at 2 in offload mode net/sched: taprio: try again to report q->qdiscs[] to qdisc_leaf() net/sched: taprio: delete misleading comment about preallocating child qdiscs net/sched: taprio: dump class stats for the actual q->qdiscs[] net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1 ----- End forwarded message ----- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Failed delivery to smtp.kernel.org: blocked using dbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver; (was: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with its children) 2023-05-31 18:33 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with its children Vladimir Oltean @ 2023-06-01 6:06 ` Paul Menzel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Paul Menzel @ 2023-06-01 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: netdev, Jiri Pirko, Pedro Tammela, Jamal Hadi Salim, linux-kernel, Eric Dumazet, intel-wired-lan, Cong Wang, Peilin Ye, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, David S. Miller [Cc: postmaster@kernel.org] Dear Vladimir, I have not seen this message. Maybe the postmasters know more. Kind regards, Paul Am 31.05.23 um 20:33 schrieb Vladimir Oltean: > Has anyone received this message? I guess at least vger and kuba@kernel.org > rejected it, because I got this bounce email: > > kernel.org suspects your message is spam and rejected it. > > Error: > 550 5.7.350 Remote server returned message detected as spam -> 554 5.7.1 > Service unavailable; Helo command [EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com] > blocked using dbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver; > https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/34.216.226.155 > > Message rejected by: smtp.kernel.org > > Interestingly, if I click the link above, it says "This is not due to an > issue with your email set-up", so I'm not sure what to believe... > > ----- Forwarded message from Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> ----- > > Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 20:39:23 +0300 > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> > To: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet > <edumazet@google.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni > <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>, Cong Wang > <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Vinicius Costa > Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, > intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli > <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>, Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>, > Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com> > Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with > its children > X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 > > Prompted by Vinicius' request to consolidate some child Qdisc > dereferences in taprio: > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87edmxv7x2.fsf@intel.com/ > > I remembered that I had left some unfinished work in this Qdisc, namely > commit af7b29b1deaa ("Revert "net/sched: taprio: make qdisc_leaf() see > the per-netdev-queue pfifo child qdiscs""). > > This patch set represents another stab at, essentially, what's in the > title. Not only does taprio not properly detect when it's grafted as a > non-root qdisc, but it also returns incorrect per-class stats. > Eventually, Vinicius' request is addressed too, although in a different > form than the one he requested (which was purely cosmetic). > > Review from people more experienced with Qdiscs than me would be > appreciated. I tried my best to explain what I consider to be problems. > I am deliberately targeting net-next because the changes are too > invasive for net - they were reverted from stable once already. > > Vladimir Oltean (5): > net/sched: taprio: don't access q->qdiscs[] in unoffloaded mode during > attach() > net/sched: taprio: keep child Qdisc refcount elevated at 2 in offload > mode > net/sched: taprio: try again to report q->qdiscs[] to qdisc_leaf() > net/sched: taprio: delete misleading comment about preallocating child > qdiscs > net/sched: taprio: dump class stats for the actual q->qdiscs[] > > net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-01 6:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20230531182758.5u5hv5leobeinxih@skbuf>
2023-05-31 18:33 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with its children Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-01 6:06 ` Failed delivery to smtp.kernel.org: blocked using dbl.spamhaus.org; Error: open resolver; (was: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 0/5] Improve the taprio qdisc's relationship with its children) Paul Menzel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox