public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@loongson.cn>
Cc: Liu Peibao <liupeibao@loongson.cn>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@loongson.cn>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH pci] PCI: don't skip probing entire device if first fn OF node has status = "disabled"
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 13:16:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230602101628.jkgq3cmwccgsfb4c@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a7f78ae-7fd8-b68d-691c-609a38ab3161@loongson.cn>

Hi Jianmin,

On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 03:36:18PM +0800, Jianmin Lv wrote:
> On 2023/6/2 下午3:21, Liu Peibao wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > It seems that modification for current PCI enumeration framework is
> > needed to solve the problem. If the effect of this modification is not
> > easy to evaluate, for the requirement of Loongson, it should be OK that
> > do the things in Loongson PCI controller driver like discussed
> > before[1].
> > 
> > Br,
> > Peibao
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221114074346.23008-1-liupeibao@loongson.cn/
> > 
> 
> Agree. For current pci core code, all functions of the device will be
> skipped if function 0 is not found, even without the patch 6fffbc7ae137
> (e.g. the func 0 is disabled in bios by setting pci header to 0xffffffff).
> So it seems that there are two ways for the issue:
> 
> 1. Adjust the pci scan core code to allow separate function to be
> enumerated, which will affect widely the pci core code.
> 2. Only Adjust loongson pci controller driver as Peibao said, and any
> function of the device should use platform device in DT if function 0 is
> disabled, which is acceptable for loongson.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jianmin

How about 3. handle of_device_is_available() in the probe function of
the "loongson, pci-gmac" driver? Would that not work?

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-02 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-21 11:51 [PATCH pci] PCI: don't skip probing entire device if first fn OF node has status = "disabled" Vladimir Oltean
2023-05-29 20:48 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-05-30 21:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-30 22:04   ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-05-30 22:27     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-30 23:15       ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-05-31 16:56         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-31 16:58           ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-05-31 20:24             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-01  8:11               ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-01 15:44                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-01 16:33                   ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-01 17:51                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-01 22:15                       ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-02  4:06                         ` 陈华才
2023-06-02  7:21                         ` Liu Peibao
2023-06-02  7:36                           ` Jianmin Lv
2023-06-02 10:16                             ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2023-06-03  2:35                               ` Jianmin Lv
2023-06-04  8:55                                 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-05  0:59                                   ` Jianmin Lv
2023-06-05  9:34                                     ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-06-16  2:12                                       ` Jianmin Lv
2023-06-16 17:57                                   ` Rob Herring
2023-08-03 10:39                                     ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-08-03 11:34                                       ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230602101628.jkgq3cmwccgsfb4c@skbuf \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@loongson.cn \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liupeibao@loongson.cn \
    --cc=lvjianmin@loongson.cn \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhoubinbin@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox