* [PATCH net v5 1/4] dpll: fix broken error path in dpll_pin_alloc(..)
2024-01-18 11:07 [PATCH net v5 0/4] dpll: fix unordered unbind/bind registerer issues Arkadiusz Kubalewski
@ 2024-01-18 11:07 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2024-01-18 11:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-01-18 11:07 ` [PATCH net v5 2/4] dpll: fix pin dump crash for rebound module Arkadiusz Kubalewski
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Arkadiusz Kubalewski @ 2024-01-18 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: vadim.fedorenko, jiri, davem, milena.olech, linux-kernel, pabeni,
kuba, mschmidt, Arkadiusz Kubalewski
If pin type is not expected, or dpll_pin_prop_dup(..) failed to
allocate memory, the unwind error path shall not destroy pin's xarrays,
which were not yet initialized.
Add new goto label and use it to fix broken error path.
Fixes: 9431063ad323 ("dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions")
Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
---
v5:
- make this patch first in the series, previously was fourth
drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
index 1eca8cc271f8..c08772ee9fd6 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ dpll_pin_alloc(u64 clock_id, u32 pin_idx, struct module *module,
if (WARN_ON(prop->type < DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MUX ||
prop->type > DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MAX)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
- goto err;
+ goto err_pin_prop;
}
pin->prop = prop;
refcount_set(&pin->refcount, 1);
@@ -450,11 +450,12 @@ dpll_pin_alloc(u64 clock_id, u32 pin_idx, struct module *module,
ret = xa_alloc_cyclic(&dpll_pin_xa, &pin->id, pin, xa_limit_32b,
&dpll_pin_xa_id, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret)
- goto err;
+ goto err_xa_alloc;
return pin;
-err:
+err_xa_alloc:
xa_destroy(&pin->dpll_refs);
xa_destroy(&pin->parent_refs);
+err_pin_prop:
kfree(pin);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net v5 1/4] dpll: fix broken error path in dpll_pin_alloc(..)
2024-01-18 11:07 ` [PATCH net v5 1/4] dpll: fix broken error path in dpll_pin_alloc(..) Arkadiusz Kubalewski
@ 2024-01-18 11:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-01-19 13:49 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Pirko @ 2024-01-18 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski
Cc: netdev, vadim.fedorenko, davem, milena.olech, linux-kernel,
pabeni, kuba, mschmidt
Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:07:16PM CET, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com wrote:
>If pin type is not expected, or dpll_pin_prop_dup(..) failed to
>allocate memory, the unwind error path shall not destroy pin's xarrays,
>which were not yet initialized.
>Add new goto label and use it to fix broken error path.
>
>Fixes: 9431063ad323 ("dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions")
>Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH net v5 1/4] dpll: fix broken error path in dpll_pin_alloc(..)
2024-01-18 11:32 ` Jiri Pirko
@ 2024-01-19 13:49 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kubalewski, Arkadiusz @ 2024-01-19 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Pirko
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev,
davem@davemloft.net, Olech, Milena, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, mschmidt
>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
>Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 12:33 PM
>
>Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:07:16PM CET, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com wrote:
>>If pin type is not expected, or dpll_pin_prop_dup(..) failed to
>>allocate memory, the unwind error path shall not destroy pin's xarrays,
>>which were not yet initialized.
>>Add new goto label and use it to fix broken error path.
>>
>>Fixes: 9431063ad323 ("dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions")
>>Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
>
>Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Thank you!
Arkadiusz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net v5 2/4] dpll: fix pin dump crash for rebound module
2024-01-18 11:07 [PATCH net v5 0/4] dpll: fix unordered unbind/bind registerer issues Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2024-01-18 11:07 ` [PATCH net v5 1/4] dpll: fix broken error path in dpll_pin_alloc(..) Arkadiusz Kubalewski
@ 2024-01-18 11:07 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2024-01-18 11:44 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-01-18 11:07 ` [PATCH net v5 3/4] dpll: fix userspace availability of pins Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2024-01-18 11:07 ` [PATCH net v5 4/4] dpll: fix register pin with unregistered parent pin Arkadiusz Kubalewski
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Arkadiusz Kubalewski @ 2024-01-18 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: vadim.fedorenko, jiri, davem, milena.olech, linux-kernel, pabeni,
kuba, mschmidt, Arkadiusz Kubalewski, Jan Glaza, Przemek Kitszel
When a kernel module is unbound but the pin resources were not entirely
freed (other kernel module instance of the same PCI device have had kept
the reference to that pin), and kernel module is again bound, the pin
properties would not be updated (the properties are only assigned when
memory for the pin is allocated), prop pointer still points to the
kernel module memory of the kernel module which was deallocated on the
unbind.
If the pin dump is invoked in this state, the result is a kernel crash.
Prevent the crash by storing persistent pin properties in dpll subsystem,
copy the content from the kernel module when pin is allocated, instead of
using memory of the kernel module.
Fixes: 9431063ad323 ("dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions")
Fixes: 9d71b54b65b1 ("dpll: netlink: Add DPLL framework base functions")
Reviewed-by: Jan Glaza <jan.glaza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
---
v5:
- make this patch second in series, previously was first
drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h | 4 +--
drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 28 +++++++++----------
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
index c08772ee9fd6..55f6eda5d2d4 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
@@ -425,6 +425,53 @@ void dpll_device_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_unregister);
+static void dpll_pin_prop_free(struct dpll_pin_properties *prop)
+{
+ kfree(prop->package_label);
+ kfree(prop->panel_label);
+ kfree(prop->board_label);
+ kfree(prop->freq_supported);
+}
+
+static int dpll_pin_prop_dup(const struct dpll_pin_properties *src,
+ struct dpll_pin_properties *dst)
+{
+ memcpy(dst, src, sizeof(*dst));
+ if (src->freq_supported && src->freq_supported_num) {
+ size_t freq_size = src->freq_supported_num *
+ sizeof(*src->freq_supported);
+ dst->freq_supported = kmemdup(src->freq_supported,
+ freq_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!src->freq_supported)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ if (src->board_label) {
+ dst->board_label = kstrdup(src->board_label, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dst->board_label)
+ goto err_board_label;
+ }
+ if (src->panel_label) {
+ dst->panel_label = kstrdup(src->panel_label, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dst->panel_label)
+ goto err_panel_label;
+ }
+ if (src->package_label) {
+ dst->package_label = kstrdup(src->package_label, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dst->package_label)
+ goto err_package_label;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_package_label:
+ kfree(dst->panel_label);
+err_panel_label:
+ kfree(dst->board_label);
+err_board_label:
+ kfree(dst->freq_supported);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
static struct dpll_pin *
dpll_pin_alloc(u64 clock_id, u32 pin_idx, struct module *module,
const struct dpll_pin_properties *prop)
@@ -443,7 +490,9 @@ dpll_pin_alloc(u64 clock_id, u32 pin_idx, struct module *module,
ret = -EINVAL;
goto err_pin_prop;
}
- pin->prop = prop;
+ ret = dpll_pin_prop_dup(prop, &pin->prop);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_pin_prop;
refcount_set(&pin->refcount, 1);
xa_init_flags(&pin->dpll_refs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
xa_init_flags(&pin->parent_refs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
@@ -515,6 +564,7 @@ void dpll_pin_put(struct dpll_pin *pin)
xa_destroy(&pin->dpll_refs);
xa_destroy(&pin->parent_refs);
xa_erase(&dpll_pin_xa, pin->id);
+ dpll_pin_prop_free(&pin->prop);
kfree(pin);
}
mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
@@ -637,7 +687,7 @@ int dpll_pin_on_pin_register(struct dpll_pin *parent, struct dpll_pin *pin,
unsigned long i, stop;
int ret;
- if (WARN_ON(parent->prop->type != DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MUX))
+ if (WARN_ON(parent->prop.type != DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MUX))
return -EINVAL;
if (WARN_ON(!ops) ||
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
index 5585873c5c1b..717f715015c7 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct dpll_device {
* @module: module of creator
* @dpll_refs: hold referencees to dplls pin was registered with
* @parent_refs: hold references to parent pins pin was registered with
- * @prop: pointer to pin properties given by registerer
+ * @prop: pin properties copied from the registerer
* @rclk_dev_name: holds name of device when pin can recover clock from it
* @refcount: refcount
**/
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ struct dpll_pin {
struct module *module;
struct xarray dpll_refs;
struct xarray parent_refs;
- const struct dpll_pin_properties *prop;
+ struct dpll_pin_properties prop;
refcount_t refcount;
};
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index 3370dbddb86b..30f5be020862 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -303,17 +303,17 @@ dpll_msg_add_pin_freq(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
if (nla_put_64bit(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY, sizeof(freq), &freq,
DPLL_A_PIN_PAD))
return -EMSGSIZE;
- for (fs = 0; fs < pin->prop->freq_supported_num; fs++) {
+ for (fs = 0; fs < pin->prop.freq_supported_num; fs++) {
nest = nla_nest_start(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY_SUPPORTED);
if (!nest)
return -EMSGSIZE;
- freq = pin->prop->freq_supported[fs].min;
+ freq = pin->prop.freq_supported[fs].min;
if (nla_put_64bit(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY_MIN, sizeof(freq),
&freq, DPLL_A_PIN_PAD)) {
nla_nest_cancel(msg, nest);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
- freq = pin->prop->freq_supported[fs].max;
+ freq = pin->prop.freq_supported[fs].max;
if (nla_put_64bit(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY_MAX, sizeof(freq),
&freq, DPLL_A_PIN_PAD)) {
nla_nest_cancel(msg, nest);
@@ -329,9 +329,9 @@ static bool dpll_pin_is_freq_supported(struct dpll_pin *pin, u32 freq)
{
int fs;
- for (fs = 0; fs < pin->prop->freq_supported_num; fs++)
- if (freq >= pin->prop->freq_supported[fs].min &&
- freq <= pin->prop->freq_supported[fs].max)
+ for (fs = 0; fs < pin->prop.freq_supported_num; fs++)
+ if (freq >= pin->prop.freq_supported[fs].min &&
+ freq <= pin->prop.freq_supported[fs].max)
return true;
return false;
}
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static int
dpll_cmd_pin_get_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
- const struct dpll_pin_properties *prop = pin->prop;
+ const struct dpll_pin_properties *prop = &pin->prop;
struct dpll_pin_ref *ref;
int ret;
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ dpll_pin_on_pin_state_set(struct dpll_pin *pin, u32 parent_idx,
int ret;
if (!(DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_STATE_CAN_CHANGE &
- pin->prop->capabilities)) {
+ pin->prop.capabilities)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "state changing is not allowed");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ dpll_pin_state_set(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
int ret;
if (!(DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_STATE_CAN_CHANGE &
- pin->prop->capabilities)) {
+ pin->prop.capabilities)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "state changing is not allowed");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ dpll_pin_prio_set(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
int ret;
if (!(DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_PRIORITY_CAN_CHANGE &
- pin->prop->capabilities)) {
+ pin->prop.capabilities)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "prio changing is not allowed");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
@@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ dpll_pin_direction_set(struct dpll_pin *pin, struct dpll_device *dpll,
int ret;
if (!(DPLL_PIN_CAPABILITIES_DIRECTION_CAN_CHANGE &
- pin->prop->capabilities)) {
+ pin->prop.capabilities)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "direction changing is not allowed");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
@@ -838,8 +838,8 @@ dpll_pin_phase_adj_set(struct dpll_pin *pin, struct nlattr *phase_adj_attr,
int ret;
phase_adj = nla_get_s32(phase_adj_attr);
- if (phase_adj > pin->prop->phase_range.max ||
- phase_adj < pin->prop->phase_range.min) {
+ if (phase_adj > pin->prop.phase_range.max ||
+ phase_adj < pin->prop.phase_range.min) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, phase_adj_attr,
"phase adjust value not supported");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@ dpll_pin_find(u64 clock_id, struct nlattr *mod_name_attr,
unsigned long i;
xa_for_each_marked(&dpll_pin_xa, i, pin, DPLL_REGISTERED) {
- prop = pin->prop;
+ prop = &pin->prop;
cid_match = clock_id ? pin->clock_id == clock_id : true;
mod_match = mod_name_attr && module_name(pin->module) ?
!nla_strcmp(mod_name_attr,
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net v5 2/4] dpll: fix pin dump crash for rebound module
2024-01-18 11:07 ` [PATCH net v5 2/4] dpll: fix pin dump crash for rebound module Arkadiusz Kubalewski
@ 2024-01-18 11:44 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-01-19 13:49 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Pirko @ 2024-01-18 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski
Cc: netdev, vadim.fedorenko, davem, milena.olech, linux-kernel,
pabeni, kuba, mschmidt, Jan Glaza, Przemek Kitszel
Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:07:17PM CET, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com wrote:
[...]
>@@ -443,7 +490,9 @@ dpll_pin_alloc(u64 clock_id, u32 pin_idx, struct module *module,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto err_pin_prop;
> }
>- pin->prop = prop;
>+ ret = dpll_pin_prop_dup(prop, &pin->prop);
>+ if (ret)
>+ goto err_pin_prop;
> refcount_set(&pin->refcount, 1);
> xa_init_flags(&pin->dpll_refs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
> xa_init_flags(&pin->parent_refs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
You are missing dpll_pin_prop_free() call on error path. It should go
right above "err_pin_prop:" line.
Haste makes waste..
pw-bot: cr
>@@ -515,6 +564,7 @@ void dpll_pin_put(struct dpll_pin *pin)
> xa_destroy(&pin->dpll_refs);
> xa_destroy(&pin->parent_refs);
> xa_erase(&dpll_pin_xa, pin->id);
>+ dpll_pin_prop_free(&pin->prop);
To be symmetric with dpll_pin_alloc() order, xa_erase() should be called
first here and xa_destroys() in different order. But that is a material
for net-next.
> kfree(pin);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH net v5 2/4] dpll: fix pin dump crash for rebound module
2024-01-18 11:44 ` Jiri Pirko
@ 2024-01-19 13:49 ` Kubalewski, Arkadiusz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kubalewski, Arkadiusz @ 2024-01-19 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiri Pirko
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev,
davem@davemloft.net, Olech, Milena, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, mschmidt, Glaza, Jan,
Kitszel, Przemyslaw
>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
>Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 12:44 PM
>
>Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:07:17PM CET, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>@@ -443,7 +490,9 @@ dpll_pin_alloc(u64 clock_id, u32 pin_idx, struct
>>module *module,
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto err_pin_prop;
>> }
>>- pin->prop = prop;
>>+ ret = dpll_pin_prop_dup(prop, &pin->prop);
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ goto err_pin_prop;
>> refcount_set(&pin->refcount, 1);
>> xa_init_flags(&pin->dpll_refs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>> xa_init_flags(&pin->parent_refs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>
>You are missing dpll_pin_prop_free() call on error path. It should go
>right above "err_pin_prop:" line.
>
>Haste makes waste..
True, fixed in v6.
>
>pw-bot: cr
>
>
>
>>@@ -515,6 +564,7 @@ void dpll_pin_put(struct dpll_pin *pin)
>> xa_destroy(&pin->dpll_refs);
>> xa_destroy(&pin->parent_refs);
>> xa_erase(&dpll_pin_xa, pin->id);
>>+ dpll_pin_prop_free(&pin->prop);
>
>To be symmetric with dpll_pin_alloc() order, xa_erase() should be called
>first here and xa_destroys() in different order. But that is a material
>for net-next.
Makes sense.
Thank you!
Arkadiusz
>
>
>
>> kfree(pin);
>> }
>> mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
>
>[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net v5 3/4] dpll: fix userspace availability of pins
2024-01-18 11:07 [PATCH net v5 0/4] dpll: fix unordered unbind/bind registerer issues Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2024-01-18 11:07 ` [PATCH net v5 1/4] dpll: fix broken error path in dpll_pin_alloc(..) Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2024-01-18 11:07 ` [PATCH net v5 2/4] dpll: fix pin dump crash for rebound module Arkadiusz Kubalewski
@ 2024-01-18 11:07 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
2024-01-18 11:07 ` [PATCH net v5 4/4] dpll: fix register pin with unregistered parent pin Arkadiusz Kubalewski
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Arkadiusz Kubalewski @ 2024-01-18 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: vadim.fedorenko, jiri, davem, milena.olech, linux-kernel, pabeni,
kuba, mschmidt, Arkadiusz Kubalewski, Jan Glaza, Jiri Pirko
If parent pin was unregistered but child pin was not, the userspace
would see the "zombie" pins - the ones that were registered with
a parent pin (dpll_pin_on_pin_register(..)).
Technically those are not available - as there is no dpll device in the
system. Do not dump those pins and prevent userspace from any
interaction with them. Provide a unified function to determine if the
pin is available and use it before acting/responding for user requests.
Fixes: 9d71b54b65b1 ("dpll: netlink: Add DPLL framework base functions")
Reviewed-by: Jan Glaza <jan.glaza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
---
v5:
- make this patch third in series, previously was second
drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index 30f5be020862..314bb3775465 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -553,6 +553,24 @@ __dpll_device_change_ntf(struct dpll_device *dpll)
return dpll_device_event_send(DPLL_CMD_DEVICE_CHANGE_NTF, dpll);
}
+static bool dpll_pin_available(struct dpll_pin *pin)
+{
+ struct dpll_pin_ref *par_ref;
+ unsigned long i;
+
+ if (!xa_get_mark(&dpll_pin_xa, pin->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
+ return false;
+ xa_for_each(&pin->parent_refs, i, par_ref)
+ if (xa_get_mark(&dpll_pin_xa, par_ref->pin->id,
+ DPLL_REGISTERED))
+ return true;
+ xa_for_each(&pin->dpll_refs, i, par_ref)
+ if (xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, par_ref->dpll->id,
+ DPLL_REGISTERED))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
/**
* dpll_device_change_ntf - notify that the dpll device has been changed
* @dpll: registered dpll pointer
@@ -579,7 +597,7 @@ dpll_pin_event_send(enum dpll_cmd event, struct dpll_pin *pin)
int ret = -ENOMEM;
void *hdr;
- if (WARN_ON(!xa_get_mark(&dpll_pin_xa, pin->id, DPLL_REGISTERED)))
+ if (!dpll_pin_available(pin))
return -ENODEV;
msg = genlmsg_new(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1130,6 +1148,10 @@ int dpll_nl_pin_id_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
}
pin = dpll_pin_find_from_nlattr(info);
if (!IS_ERR(pin)) {
+ if (!dpll_pin_available(pin)) {
+ nlmsg_free(msg);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_handle(msg, pin);
if (ret) {
nlmsg_free(msg);
@@ -1179,6 +1201,8 @@ int dpll_nl_pin_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
xa_for_each_marked_start(&dpll_pin_xa, i, pin, DPLL_REGISTERED,
ctx->idx) {
+ if (!dpll_pin_available(pin))
+ continue;
hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq,
&dpll_nl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
@@ -1441,7 +1465,8 @@ int dpll_pin_pre_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
}
info->user_ptr[0] = xa_load(&dpll_pin_xa,
nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLL_A_PIN_ID]));
- if (!info->user_ptr[0]) {
+ if (!info->user_ptr[0] ||
+ !dpll_pin_available(info->user_ptr[0])) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(info->extack, "pin not found");
ret = -ENODEV;
goto unlock_dev;
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH net v5 4/4] dpll: fix register pin with unregistered parent pin
2024-01-18 11:07 [PATCH net v5 0/4] dpll: fix unordered unbind/bind registerer issues Arkadiusz Kubalewski
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-18 11:07 ` [PATCH net v5 3/4] dpll: fix userspace availability of pins Arkadiusz Kubalewski
@ 2024-01-18 11:07 ` Arkadiusz Kubalewski
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Arkadiusz Kubalewski @ 2024-01-18 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: vadim.fedorenko, jiri, davem, milena.olech, linux-kernel, pabeni,
kuba, mschmidt, Arkadiusz Kubalewski, Jan Glaza, Jiri Pirko
In case of multiple kernel module instances using the same dpll device:
if only one registers dpll device, then only that one can register
directly connected pins with a dpll device. When unregistered parent is
responsible for determining if the muxed pin can be registered with it
or not, the drivers need to be loaded in serialized order to work
correctly - first the driver instance which registers the direct pins
needs to be loaded, then the other instances could register muxed type
pins.
Allow registration of a pin with a parent even if the parent was not
yet registered, thus allow ability for unserialized driver instance
load order.
Do not WARN_ON notification for unregistered pin, which can be invoked
for described case, instead just return error.
Fixes: 9431063ad323 ("dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions")
Fixes: 9d71b54b65b1 ("dpll: netlink: Add DPLL framework base functions")
Reviewed-by: Jan Glaza <jan.glaza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
---
v5:
- make this patch fourth in the series, previously was third
drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
index 55f6eda5d2d4..ac426a9be072 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ static u32 dpll_pin_xa_id;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, (d)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
#define ASSERT_DPLL_NOT_REGISTERED(d) \
WARN_ON_ONCE(xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, (d)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
-#define ASSERT_PIN_REGISTERED(p) \
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_get_mark(&dpll_pin_xa, (p)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
struct dpll_device_registration {
struct list_head list;
@@ -615,8 +613,6 @@ dpll_pin_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
WARN_ON(!ops->state_on_dpll_get) ||
WARN_ON(!ops->direction_get))
return -EINVAL;
- if (ASSERT_DPLL_REGISTERED(dpll))
- return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&dpll_lock);
if (WARN_ON(!(dpll->module == pin->module &&
@@ -694,8 +690,6 @@ int dpll_pin_on_pin_register(struct dpll_pin *parent, struct dpll_pin *pin,
WARN_ON(!ops->state_on_pin_get) ||
WARN_ON(!ops->direction_get))
return -EINVAL;
- if (ASSERT_PIN_REGISTERED(parent))
- return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&dpll_lock);
ret = dpll_xa_ref_pin_add(&pin->parent_refs, parent, ops, priv);
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread