* [PATCH PCI] PCI: Add ACS quirk for Wangxun FF5XXX NICS
@ 2024-11-12 11:18 Mengyuan Lou
2024-11-12 17:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mengyuan Lou @ 2024-11-12 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-pci; +Cc: netdev, jiawenwu, duanqiangwen, Mengyuan Lou
Wangxun FF5XXX NICs are same as selection of SFxxx, RP1000 and
RP2000 NICS. They may be multi-function devices, but the hardware
does not advertise ACS capability.
Add this ACS quirk for FF5XXX NICs in pci_quirk_wangxun_nic_acs
so the functions can be in independent IOMMU groups.
Signed-off-by: Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>
---
drivers/pci/quirks.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index dccb60c1d9cc..d1973a8fd70c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -4996,18 +4996,20 @@ static int pci_quirk_brcm_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
}
/*
- * Wangxun 10G/1G NICs have no ACS capability, and on multi-function
+ * Wangxun 40G/25G/10G/1G NICs have no ACS capability, and on multi-function
* devices, peer-to-peer transactions are not be used between the functions.
* So add an ACS quirk for below devices to isolate functions.
* SFxxx 1G NICs(em).
* RP1000/RP2000 10G NICs(sp).
+ * FF5xxx 40G/25G/10G NICs(aml).
*/
static int pci_quirk_wangxun_nic_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
{
switch (dev->device) {
- case 0x0100 ... 0x010F:
- case 0x1001:
- case 0x2001:
+ case 0x0100 ... 0x010F: /* EM */
+ case 0x1001: case 0x2001: /* SP */
+ case 0x5010: case 0x5025: case 0x5040: /* AML */
+ case 0x5110: case 0x5125: case 0x5140: /* AML */
return pci_acs_ctrl_enabled(acs_flags,
PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF);
}
--
2.43.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH PCI] PCI: Add ACS quirk for Wangxun FF5XXX NICS
2024-11-12 11:18 [PATCH PCI] PCI: Add ACS quirk for Wangxun FF5XXX NICS Mengyuan Lou
@ 2024-11-12 17:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-14 6:27 ` mengyuanlou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2024-11-12 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mengyuan Lou; +Cc: linux-pci, netdev, jiawenwu, duanqiangwen
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 07:18:16PM +0800, Mengyuan Lou wrote:
> Wangxun FF5XXX NICs are same as selection of SFxxx, RP1000 and
> RP2000 NICS. They may be multi-function devices, but the hardware
> does not advertise ACS capability.
>
> Add this ACS quirk for FF5XXX NICs in pci_quirk_wangxun_nic_acs
> so the functions can be in independent IOMMU groups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>
I propose the following commit log and comment updates to be clear
that the hardware actually enforces this isolation. Please
confirm that they are accurate.
PCI: Add ACS quirk for Wangxun FF5xxx NICs
Wangxun FF5xxx NICs are similar to SFxxx, RP1000 and RP2000 NICs.
They may be multi-function devices, but they do not advertise an ACS
capability.
But the hardware does isolate FF5xxx functions as though it had an
ACS capability and PCI_ACS_RR and PCI_ACS_CR were set in the ACS
Control register, i.e., all peer-to-peer traffic is directed
upstream instead of being routed internally.
Add ACS quirk for FF5xxx NICs in pci_quirk_wangxun_nic_acs() so the
functions can be in independent IOMMU groups.
> ---
> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> index dccb60c1d9cc..d1973a8fd70c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -4996,18 +4996,20 @@ static int pci_quirk_brcm_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Wangxun 10G/1G NICs have no ACS capability, and on multi-function
> + * Wangxun 40G/25G/10G/1G NICs have no ACS capability, and on multi-function
> * devices, peer-to-peer transactions are not be used between the functions.
> * So add an ACS quirk for below devices to isolate functions.
Wangxun 40G/25G/10G/1G NICs have no ACS capability, but on
multi-function devices, the hardware isolates the functions by
directing all peer-to-peer traffic upstream as though PCI_ACS_RR and
PCI_ACS_CR were set.
> * SFxxx 1G NICs(em).
> * RP1000/RP2000 10G NICs(sp).
> + * FF5xxx 40G/25G/10G NICs(aml).
> */
> static int pci_quirk_wangxun_nic_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
> {
> switch (dev->device) {
> - case 0x0100 ... 0x010F:
> - case 0x1001:
> - case 0x2001:
> + case 0x0100 ... 0x010F: /* EM */
> + case 0x1001: case 0x2001: /* SP */
> + case 0x5010: case 0x5025: case 0x5040: /* AML */
> + case 0x5110: case 0x5125: case 0x5140: /* AML */
> return pci_acs_ctrl_enabled(acs_flags,
> PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF);
> }
> --
> 2.43.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH PCI] PCI: Add ACS quirk for Wangxun FF5XXX NICS
2024-11-12 17:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2024-11-14 6:27 ` mengyuanlou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mengyuanlou @ 2024-11-14 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Helgaas; +Cc: linux-pci, netdev, jiawenwu, duanqiangwen
Thanks for your review. It is indeed accurate.
> 2024年11月13日 01:48,Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> 写道:
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 07:18:16PM +0800, Mengyuan Lou wrote:
>> Wangxun FF5XXX NICs are same as selection of SFxxx, RP1000 and
>> RP2000 NICS. They may be multi-function devices, but the hardware
>> does not advertise ACS capability.
>>
>> Add this ACS quirk for FF5XXX NICs in pci_quirk_wangxun_nic_acs
>> so the functions can be in independent IOMMU groups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>
>
> I propose the following commit log and comment updates to be clear
> that the hardware actually enforces this isolation. Please
> confirm that they are accurate.
>
> PCI: Add ACS quirk for Wangxun FF5xxx NICs
>
> Wangxun FF5xxx NICs are similar to SFxxx, RP1000 and RP2000 NICs.
> They may be multi-function devices, but they do not advertise an ACS
> capability.
>
> But the hardware does isolate FF5xxx functions as though it had an
> ACS capability and PCI_ACS_RR and PCI_ACS_CR were set in the ACS
> Control register, i.e., all peer-to-peer traffic is directed
> upstream instead of being routed internally.
>
> Add ACS quirk for FF5xxx NICs in pci_quirk_wangxun_nic_acs() so the
> functions can be in independent IOMMU groups.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> index dccb60c1d9cc..d1973a8fd70c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> @@ -4996,18 +4996,20 @@ static int pci_quirk_brcm_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * Wangxun 10G/1G NICs have no ACS capability, and on multi-function
>> + * Wangxun 40G/25G/10G/1G NICs have no ACS capability, and on multi-function
>> * devices, peer-to-peer transactions are not be used between the functions.
>> * So add an ACS quirk for below devices to isolate functions.
>
> Wangxun 40G/25G/10G/1G NICs have no ACS capability, but on
> multi-function devices, the hardware isolates the functions by
> directing all peer-to-peer traffic upstream as though PCI_ACS_RR and
> PCI_ACS_CR were set.
>
>> * SFxxx 1G NICs(em).
>> * RP1000/RP2000 10G NICs(sp).
>> + * FF5xxx 40G/25G/10G NICs(aml).
>> */
>> static int pci_quirk_wangxun_nic_acs(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 acs_flags)
>> {
>> switch (dev->device) {
>> - case 0x0100 ... 0x010F:
>> - case 0x1001:
>> - case 0x2001:
>> + case 0x0100 ... 0x010F: /* EM */
>> + case 0x1001: case 0x2001: /* SP */
>> + case 0x5010: case 0x5025: case 0x5040: /* AML */
>> + case 0x5110: case 0x5125: case 0x5140: /* AML */
>> return pci_acs_ctrl_enabled(acs_flags,
>> PCI_ACS_SV | PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_CR | PCI_ACS_UF);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.43.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-14 6:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-12 11:18 [PATCH PCI] PCI: Add ACS quirk for Wangxun FF5XXX NICS Mengyuan Lou
2024-11-12 17:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-14 6:27 ` mengyuanlou
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox