public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Cc: Tristram.Ha@microchip.com, Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com,
	andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, Woojung.Huh@microchip.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, kuba@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: fix multicast filtering
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 14:54:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250127125426.3b7cdkb75o5dbcr5@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU1R7zCsEGoM2LP5XDaTseLxiTaa+jD1STcW9ZNgaO16Sw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ+vNU1R7zCsEGoM2LP5XDaTseLxiTaa+jD1STcW9ZNgaO16Sw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:48:51PM -0800, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 5:18 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 01:02:31PM -0800, Tim Harvey wrote:
> > > The flaw with that patch is that enabling the multicast address table
> > > invokes other default rules in the table that need to be re-configured
> > > for the cpu port but the patch only configures group 0
> > > (01-80-c2-00-00-00). it fails to configure group 6 (01-80-c2-00-00-08)
> > > which is also used for stp so i would argue that it doesn't even do
> > > what the commit log says it does. it also has the side effect of
> > > disabling forwarding of other groups that were previously forwarded:
> > > - group 1 01-80-c2-00-00-01 (mac control frame) (previously were
> > > forwarded, now are dropped)
> > > - group 2 01-80-c2-00-00-03 (802.1x access control) (previously were
> > > forwarded, now are forwarded to the highest port which may not be the
> > > cpu port)
> > > - group 4 01-80-c2-00-00-20 (gmrp) (previously were forwarded, now
> > > forwarded to all except the highest port number which may not be the
> > > cpu port)
> > > - group 5 01-80-c2-00-00-21 (gvrp) (previously were forwarded, now
> > > forwarded to all except the highest port number which may not be the
> > > cpu port)
> > > - group 6 01-80-c2-00-00-02, 01-80-c2-00-00-04 - 01-80-c2-00-00-0f
> > > (previously were forwarded, now are forwarded to the highest port
> > > which may not be the cpu port)
> > > - group 7 01-80-c2-00-00-11 - 01-80-c2-00-00-1f, 01-80-c2-00-00-22 -
> > > 01-80-c2-00-00-2f (previously were forwarded, now forwarded to all
> > > except the highest port number which may not be the cpu port)
> >
> > > To fix this, I propose adding a function to configure each of the
> > > above groups (which are hardware filtering functions of the switch)
> > > with proper port masks but I need to know from the DSA experts what is
> > > desired for the port mask of those groups. The multicast address table
> > > can only invoke rules based on those groups of addresses so if that is
> > > not flexible enough then the multicast address table should instead be
> > > disabled.
> >
> > The recommendation from the DSA maintainers will be to follow what the
> > software bridge data path does, which just means testing and seeing how
> > each group reacts to the known inputs which might affect it, i.e.:
> >
> > - is it a group of the form 01-80-c2-00-00-0X? if yes, group_fwd_mask
> >   should dictate how it is forwarded by software. All that hardware
> >   needs to take care of is to send it just to the CPU.
> >
> > - is multicast flooding enabled on the egress port?
> >
> > - is there an MDB entry towards the egress port? how about another port?
> >   The groups outside the 01-80-c2-00-00-0X range should be treated as
> >   regular multicast, i.e. group_fwd_mask doesn't matter, and mdb/flooding
> >   does.
> >
> > One easy way out, if synchronizing the hardware port masks with the
> > software state turns out too hard, is to configure the switch to send
> > all these groups just to the CPU, and make sure skb->offload_fwd_mark is
> > unset for packets belonging to these groups (don't call
> > dsa_default_offload_fwd_mark() from the tagger). The software takes this
> > as a cue that it should forward them where the hardware didn't reach.
> >
> > Also, never exclude the CPU port from the destination port mask, unless
> > you really, really know what you're doing. The software bridge might
> > need to forward to another foreign (non-switch) bridge port which is an
> > Intel e1000 card, or a Wi-Fi AP, or a tunnel, and by cutting out the CPU
> > from the flood path, you're taking that possibility away from it.
> >
> > Here's a script to get you started with testing.
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> >
> > ARP=" \
> > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 00:00:de:ad:be:ef 08 06 00 01 \
> > 08 00 06 04 00 01 e0 07 1b 81 13 40 c0 a8 01 ad \
> > 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0 a8 01 ea"
> > groups=( \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:00 \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:08 \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:01 \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:03 \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:20 \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:21 \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:02 \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:04 \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:0F \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:11 \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:1F \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:22 \
> >         01:80:C2:00:00:2F \
> > )
> > pkt_count=1000
> >
> > mac_get()
> > {
> >         local if_name=$1
> >
> >         ip -j link show dev $if_name | jq -r '.[]["address"]'
> > }
> >
> > get_rx_stats()
> > {
> >         local if_name=$1
> >
> >         ip -j -s link show $if_name | jq '.[].stats64.rx.packets'
> > }
> >
> > last_nibble()
> > {
> >         local macaddr=$1
> >
> >         echo "0x${macaddr:0-1}"
> > }
> >
> > send_raw()
> > {
> >         local if_name=$1; shift
> >         local group=$1; shift
> >         local pkt="$1"; shift
> >         local smac=$(mac_get $if_name)
> >
> >         pkt="${pkt/ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff/$group}"
> >         pkt="${pkt/00:00:de:ad:be:ef/$smac}"
> >
> >         mausezahn -c $pkt_count -q $if_name "$pkt"
> > }
> >
> > run_test()
> > {
> >         before=$(get_rx_stats veth4)
> >         send_raw veth0 $group "$ARP"
> >         after=$(get_rx_stats veth4)
> >         delta=$((after - before))
> >
> >         [ $delta -ge $pkt_count ] && echo "forwarded" || echo "not forwarded"
> > }
> >
> > #          br0
> > #        /  |  \
> > #       /   |   \
> > #      /    |    \
> > #     /     |     \
> > #  veth1  veth3  veth5
> > #    |      |      |
> > #  veth0  veth2  veth4
> > ip link add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
> > ip link add veth2 type veth peer name veth3
> > ip link add veth4 type veth peer name veth5
> > ip link add br0 type bridge && ip link set br0 up
> > ip link set veth1 master br0 && ip link set veth1 up
> > ip link set veth3 master br0 && ip link set veth3 up
> > ip link set veth5 master br0 && ip link set veth5 up
> > ip link set veth0 up && ip link set veth2 up && ip link set veth4 up
> >
> > for group in "${groups[@]}"; do
> >         ip link set veth5 type bridge_slave mcast_flood on
> >         with_flooding=$(run_test $group)
> >
> >         ip link set veth5 type bridge_slave mcast_flood off
> >         without_flooding=$(run_test $group)
> >
> >         bridge mdb add dev br0 port veth5 grp $group permanent
> >         with_mdb_and_no_flooding=$(run_test $group)
> >         bridge mdb del dev br0 port veth5 grp $group permanent # restore
> >
> >         ip link set veth5 type bridge_slave mcast_flood on # restore
> >
> >         bridge mdb add dev br0 port veth3 grp $group permanent
> >         with_mdb_on_another_port=$(run_test $group)
> >         bridge mdb del dev br0 port veth3 grp $group permanent # restore
> >
> >         ip link set br0 type bridge group_fwd_mask $((1 << $(last_nibble $group))) 2>/dev/null
> >         if [ $? = 0 ]; then
> >                 with_group_fwd_mask=$(run_test $group)
> >                 ip link set br0 type bridge group_fwd_mask 0 # restore
> >         else
> >                 with_group_fwd_mask="can't test"
> >         fi
> >
> >         printf "Group %s: %s with flooding, %s without flooding, %s with mdb and no flooding, %s with mdb on another port and flooding, %s with group_fwd_mask\n" \
> >                 "$group" \
> >                 "$with_flooding" \
> >                 "$without_flooding" \
> >                 "$with_mdb_and_no_flooding" \
> >                 "$with_mdb_on_another_port" \
> >                 "$with_group_fwd_mask" \
> >
> > done
> >
> > ip link del veth0
> > ip link del veth2
> > ip link del veth4
> > ip link del br0
> 
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> Here is the output of your script with Linux 6.13:
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:00: forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not forwarded
> with mdb on another port and flooding, can't test with group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:08: not forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, not forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not
> forwarded with mdb on another port and flooding, forwarded with
> group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:01: not forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, not forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not
> forwarded with mdb on another port and flooding, can't test with
> group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:03: not forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, not forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not
> forwarded with mdb on another port and flooding, forwarded with
> group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:20: forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not forwarded
> with mdb on another port and flooding, can't test with group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:21: forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not forwarded
> with mdb on another port and flooding, can't test with group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:02: not forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, not forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not
> forwarded with mdb on another port and flooding, can't test with
> group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:04: not forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, not forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not
> forwarded with mdb on another port and flooding, forwarded with
> group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:0F: not forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, not forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not
> forwarded with mdb on another port and flooding, forwarded with
> group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:11: forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not forwarded
> with mdb on another port and flooding, can't test with group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:1F: forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not forwarded
> with mdb on another port and flooding, forwarded with group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:22: forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not forwarded
> with mdb on another port and flooding, can't test with group_fwd_mask
> Group 01:80:C2:00:00:2F: forwarded with flooding, not forwarded
> without flooding, forwarded with mdb and no flooding, not forwarded
> with mdb on another port and flooding, forwarded with group_fwd_mask
> 
> Why did you choose these addresses?

I took these addresses from your previous reply. You can customize as
needed, to find out the bridge behavior for any group, of course.

> 
> The original complaint I'm trying to address was that LLDP used to be
> forwarded on the ksz9477 prior to the enabling of the hw multicast
> address table and now is not. LLDP uses both 01-80-c2-00-00-00 and
> 01-80-c2-00-00-0e and while 01-80-c2-00-00-00 is forwarded currently
> on the ksz9477 01-80-c2-00-00-0e is not. It's the same for the
> software bridge scenario above - when I add 01-80-c2-00-00-0e to the
> test, it's not forwarded. Where are the above rules implemented for
> the software bridge and why are these the choices?

If you see the "can't test with group_fwd_mask" error, it means that the
bridge is outright refusing to forward this particular group. See
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.6/A/ident/BR_GROUPFWD_RESTRICTED
for more details.

For example, the bridge refuses to forward 01-80-c2-00-00-00 and the
question is why you would want to do that. "Previous behavior" doesn't
always mean "correct behavior".

Whereas group 01-80-c2-00-00-0e, as far as I can see, can be forwarded
fine by the software bridge when BIT(14) is set in the bridge group_fwd_mask.
For such groups, an accelerator has nothing more to do than ensure
skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0 on RX, and trap them exclusively to the CPU.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-27 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20241212215132.3111392-1-tharvey@gateworks.com>
2024-12-13  0:00 ` [PATCH net] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: fix multicast filtering Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-13  0:32   ` Tim Harvey
2024-12-13  1:14     ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-27 19:06       ` Tim Harvey
2025-01-03  3:29         ` Arun.Ramadoss
2025-01-14 18:27           ` Tim Harvey
2025-01-16  9:06             ` Arun.Ramadoss
2025-01-17  1:09               ` Tristram.Ha
2025-01-17  1:25                 ` Tim Harvey
2025-01-17 16:13                   ` Vladimir Oltean
2025-01-17 21:02                     ` Tim Harvey
2025-01-18  1:18                       ` Vladimir Oltean
2025-01-23  1:48                         ` Tim Harvey
2025-01-27 12:54                           ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2025-01-18  0:49                   ` Tristram.Ha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250127125426.3b7cdkb75o5dbcr5@skbuf \
    --to=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com \
    --cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=Woojung.Huh@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox