From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Marcin Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] Marvell PTP support
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 15:19:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250416151949.6bddde35@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_-Lr-w95sX4fLIF@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:51:27 +0100
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:26:15PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This series is a work in progress, and represents the current state of
> > things, superseding Kory's patches which were based in a very old
> > version of my patches - and my patches were subsequently refactored
> > and further developed about five years ago. Due to them breaking
> > mvpp2 if merged, there was no point in posting them until such time
> > that the underlying issues with PTP were resolved - and they now have
> > been.
> >
> > Marvell re-uses their PTP IP in several of their products - PHYs,
> > switches and even some ethernet MACs contain the same IP. It really
> > doesn't make sense to duplicate the code in each of these use cases.
> >
> > Therefore, this series introduces a Marvell PTP core that can be
> > re-used - a TAI module, which handles the global parts of the PTP
> > core, and the TS module, which handles the per-port timestamping.
> >
> > I will note at this point that although the Armada 388 TRM states that
> > NETA contains the same IP, attempts to access the registers returns
> > zero, and it is not known if that is due to the board missing something
> > or whether it isn't actually implemented. I do have some early work
> > re-using this, but when I discovered that the TAI registers read as
> > zero and wouldn't accept writes, I haven't progressed that.
> >
> > Today, I have converted the mv88e6xxx DSA code to use the Marvell TAI
> > module from patch 1, and for the sake of getting the code out there,
> > I have included the "hacky" patches in this series - with the issues
> > with DSA VLANs that I reported this evening and subsequently
> > investigated, I've not had any spare time to properly prepare that
> > part of this series. (Being usurped from phylink by stmmac - for which
> > I have a big stack of patches that I can't get out because of being
> > usurped, and then again by Marvell PTP, and then again by DSA VLAN
> > stuff... yea, I'm feeling like I have zero time to do anything right
> > now.) The mv88e6xxx DSA code still needs to be converted to use the
> > Marvell TS part of patch 1, but I won't be able to test that after
> > Sunday, and I'm certainly not working on this over this weekend.
> >
> > Anyway, this is what it is - and this is likely the state of it for
> > a while yet, because I won't be able to sensibly access the hardware
> > for testing for an undefined period of time.
> >
> > The PHY parts seem to work, although not 100% reliably, with the
> > occasional overrun, particularly on the receive side. I'm not sure
> > whether this is down to a hardware bug or not, or MDIO driver bug,
> > because we certainly aren't missing timestamping a SKB. This has been
> > tested at L2 and L4.
> >
> > I'm not sure which packets we should be timestamping (remembering
> > that this is global config across all ports.)
> > https://chronos.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/TechnicalBrief-IEEE1588v2PTP.pdf
> > suggests Sync, Delay_req and Delay_resp need to be timestamped,
> > possibly PDelay_req and PDelay_resp as well, but I haven't seen
> > those produced by PTPDv2 nor ptp4l.
> >
> > There's probably other stuff I should mention, but as I've been at
> > this into the evening for almost every day this week, I'm mentally
> > exhausted.
> >
> > Sorry also if this isn't coherent.
>
> I've just updated this series for the supported pins flags that was
> merged into net-next last night.
>
> Kory, if you have any changes you want me to review before sending
> out the updates, please send soon. Thanks.
Maybe using kdoc in marvell_ts.c. You can copy paste the ones I wrote on the v2
of your driver I posted.
Also don't forget to run checkpatch, patchwork reported errors on your series.
It was not an issue as it was a RFC but it will if you remove it.
Regards,
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-11 21:26 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] Marvell PTP support Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-11 21:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/5] net: mvpp2: add support for hardware timestamps Russell King
2025-04-11 21:29 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-14 12:51 ` Kory Maincent
2025-04-14 14:43 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-14 15:02 ` Kory Maincent
2025-04-11 21:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/5] ptp: marvell: add core support for Marvell PTP v2.1 Russell King
2025-04-11 21:30 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 8:48 ` Kory Maincent
2025-04-16 9:22 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 13:14 ` Kory Maincent
2025-06-13 15:19 ` Kory Maincent
2025-10-03 13:09 ` Casper Andersson
2025-04-11 21:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/5] net: phy: add Marvell PHY PTP support Russell King
2025-04-14 12:33 ` Kory Maincent
2025-04-14 12:37 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-14 13:57 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-14 14:43 ` Kory Maincent
2025-04-14 14:55 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-14 15:21 ` Kory Maincent
2025-04-14 16:16 ` Kory Maincent
2025-04-14 16:35 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-11 21:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/5] mv88e6xxx: convert to marvell TAI Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-11 21:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 5/5] mv88e6xxx: cleanup ptp tai Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-11 21:30 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/5] Marvell PTP support Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 10:51 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-16 13:19 ` Kory Maincent [this message]
2025-04-16 14:13 ` Russell King (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250416151949.6bddde35@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390 \
--to=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=marcin.s.wojtas@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox