public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] nvme-tcp: use crc32c() and skb_copy_and_crc32c_datagram_iter()
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 10:45:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250517174552.GB1239@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCbWAFNoBUjci7HG@infradead.org>

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:06:56PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:31:00PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > +static inline __le32 nvme_tcp_hdgst(const void *pdu, size_t len)
> > +{
> > +	return cpu_to_le32(~crc32c(NVME_TCP_CRC_SEED, pdu, len));
> >  }
> 
> This drops the unaligned handling.  Now in the NVMe protocol it will
> always be properly aligned, but my TCP-foo is not good enough to
> remember if the networking code will also guarantee 32-bit alignment
> for the start of the packet?
> 
> Otherwise this looks great:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

The nvme-tcp driver already assumes that the header is at least 4-byte aligned,
considering that it accesses hdr->plen and the struct doesn't use __packed:

    struct nvme_tcp_hdr {
            __u8	type;
            __u8	flags;
            __u8	hlen;
            __u8	pdo;
            __le32	plen;
    };

On the send size, the header size is always sizeof(struct nvme_tcp_cmd_pdu) or
sizeof(struct nvme_tcp_data_pdu) which are multiples of 4.  On the receive side,
nvme-tcp validates hdr->hlen == sizeof(struct nvme_tcp_rsp_pdu) and then does:

    recv_digest = *(__le32 *)(pdu + hdr->hlen);

So, using put_unaligned_le32() is unnecessary.  I just had it there in v1
because I had directly translated crypto_ahash_digest(), which does ultimately
do a put_unaligned_le32() once you unravel all the API layers.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-17 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-11  0:41 [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: faster and simpler CRC32C computation Eric Biggers
2025-05-11  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] net: introduce CONFIG_NET_CRC32C Eric Biggers
2025-05-11  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] net: add skb_crc32c() Eric Biggers
2025-05-11  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] net: use skb_crc32c() in skb_crc32c_csum_help() Eric Biggers
2025-05-11  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] RDMA/siw: use skb_crc32c() instead of __skb_checksum() Eric Biggers
2025-05-15 20:02   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-05-15 20:12     ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-16 10:42       ` Bernard Metzler
2025-05-19  9:04   ` Bernard Metzler
2025-05-20 13:18     ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-05-20 15:18       ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-21 10:38         ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-05-11  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] sctp: " Eric Biggers
2025-05-11  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] net: fold __skb_checksum() into skb_checksum() Eric Biggers
2025-05-11  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] lib/crc32: remove unused support for CRC32C combination Eric Biggers
2025-05-11  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net: add skb_copy_and_crc32c_datagram_iter() Eric Biggers
2025-05-13 21:41   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-15 18:09     ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-11  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] nvme-tcp: use crc32c() and skb_copy_and_crc32c_datagram_iter() Eric Biggers
2025-05-16  4:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-16  5:31     ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-16  6:06       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-17 17:45         ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-05-17 20:32       ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-17  9:58   ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-17 17:29     ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-17 20:30       ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-05-11  0:41 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: remove skb_copy_and_hash_datagram_iter() Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 16:30 ` [PATCH net-next 00/10] net: faster and simpler CRC32C computation Andrew Lunn
2025-05-11 17:29   ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-11 21:22     ` Andrew Lunn
2025-05-11 21:45       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-11 23:07         ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-15 19:21           ` David Laight
2025-05-15 19:50             ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-13 21:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-15 18:10   ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250517174552.GB1239@sol \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox