Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: ethernet: ave: Replace udelay with usleep_range

[David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>]

On Thu,  8 Jan 2026 15:46:41 +0900
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> wrote:

> Replace udelay() with usleep_range() as notified by checkpatch.pl.

Nak.
Look at the code...

> 
>     CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see function description
>     of usleep_range() and udelay().
>     #906: FILE: drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c:906:
>     +       udelay(50);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c
> index 4700998c4837..a3735d81a862 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/sni_ave.c
> @@ -903,11 +903,11 @@ static void ave_rxfifo_reset(struct net_device *ndev)
>  
>  	/* assert reset */
>  	writel(AVE_GRR_RXFFR, priv->base + AVE_GRR);
> -	udelay(50);
> +	usleep_range(50, 100);
>  
>  	/* negate reset */
>  	writel(0, priv->base + AVE_GRR);
> -	udelay(20);
> +	usleep_range(20, 40);
>  
>  	/* negate interrupt status */
>  	writel(AVE_GI_RXOVF, priv->base + AVE_GISR);