From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, bjorn@kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 04/14] xsk: cache data buffers to avoid frequently calling kmalloc_reserve
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 16:26:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260415082654.21026-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260415082654.21026-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
It's beneficial for small data transmission.
Replace per-SKB kmalloc_reserve() with on-demand bulk allocation from
skb_small_head_cache for small packets.
Add a persistent per-socket data buffer cache (batch.data_cache /
batch.data_count) that survives across batch cycles, similar to how
batch.send_queue caches built SKBs.
Inside the Phase-1 per-descriptor loop, when a small packet needs a
data buffer and the cache is empty, a single kmem_cache_alloc_bulk()
refills it with generic_xmit_batch objects. Subsequent small packets
pop directly from the cache. Large packets bypass the cache entirely
and fall back to kmalloc_reserve(). Unused buffers remain in the
cache for the next batch.
I observed that kmalloc_reserve() consumes nearly 40% which seems
unavoidable at the first glance, thinking adding the bulk mechanism
should contribute to the performance. That's the motivation of this
patch. Now, the feature gives us around 10% improvement.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
include/net/xdp_sock.h | 2 ++
net/core/skbuff.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
net/xdp/xsk.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock.h b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
index 84f0aee3fb10..2151aab8f0a1 100644
--- a/include/net/xdp_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ struct xsk_batch {
struct sk_buff **skb_cache;
struct xdp_desc *desc_cache;
struct sk_buff_head send_queue;
+ unsigned int data_count;
+ void **data_cache;
};
struct xdp_sock {
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index f29cecacd8bb..5726b1566b2b 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -661,9 +661,11 @@ int xsk_alloc_batch_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs, u32 nb_pkts, u32 nb_descs, int *err
unsigned int total_truesize = 0;
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ void **dc = batch->data_cache;
+ unsigned int dc_count = batch->data_count;
u32 i = 0, j, k = 0;
bool need_alloc;
- u8 *data;
+ void *data;
base_len = max(NET_SKB_PAD, L1_CACHE_ALIGN(dev->needed_headroom));
if (!(dev->priv_flags & IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR))
@@ -683,6 +685,13 @@ int xsk_alloc_batch_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs, u32 nb_pkts, u32 nb_descs, int *err
nb_pkts = skb_count;
alloc_data:
+ if (dc_count < nb_pkts && !(gfp_mask & KMALLOC_NOT_NORMAL_BITS))
+ dc_count += kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(
+ net_hotdata.skb_small_head_cache,
+ gfp_mask | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN,
+ batch->generic_xmit_batch - dc_count,
+ &dc[dc_count]);
+
/*
* Phase 1: Allocate data buffers and initialize SKBs.
* Pre-scan descriptors to determine packet boundaries, so we can
@@ -710,10 +719,17 @@ int xsk_alloc_batch_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs, u32 nb_pkts, u32 nb_descs, int *err
skb = skbs[skb_count - 1 - i];
skbuff_clear(skb);
- data = kmalloc_reserve(&size, gfp_mask, node, skb);
- if (unlikely(!data)) {
- *err = -ENOBUFS;
- break;
+ if (dc_count &&
+ SKB_HEAD_ALIGN(size) <= SKB_SMALL_HEAD_CACHE_SIZE) {
+ data = dc[--dc_count];
+ size = SKB_SMALL_HEAD_CACHE_SIZE;
+ } else {
+ data = kmalloc_reserve(&size, gfp_mask,
+ node, skb);
+ if (unlikely(!data)) {
+ *err = -ENOBUFS;
+ break;
+ }
}
__finalize_skb_around(skb, data, size);
/* Replace skb_set_owner_w() with the following */
@@ -762,6 +778,7 @@ int xsk_alloc_batch_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs, u32 nb_pkts, u32 nb_descs, int *err
while (k < i)
kfree_skb(skbs[skb_count - 1 - k++]);
+ batch->data_count = dc_count;
batch->skb_count = skb_count - i;
return j;
diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
index f97bc9cf9b9a..7a6991bc19a8 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
@@ -1229,14 +1229,22 @@ static void xsk_delete_from_maps(struct xdp_sock *xs)
}
static void xsk_batch_reset(struct xsk_batch *batch, struct sk_buff **skbs,
- struct xdp_desc *descs, unsigned int size)
-{
+ struct xdp_desc *descs, void **data,
+ unsigned int size)
+{
+ if (batch->data_count)
+ kmem_cache_free_bulk(net_hotdata.skb_small_head_cache,
+ batch->data_count,
+ batch->data_cache);
+ kfree(batch->data_cache);
if (batch->skb_count)
kmem_cache_free_bulk(net_hotdata.skbuff_cache,
batch->skb_count,
(void **)batch->skb_cache);
kfree(batch->skb_cache);
kvfree(batch->desc_cache);
+ batch->data_cache = data;
+ batch->data_count = 0;
batch->skb_cache = skbs;
batch->desc_cache = descs;
batch->skb_count = 0;
@@ -1272,7 +1280,7 @@ static int xsk_release(struct socket *sock)
xskq_destroy(xs->tx);
xskq_destroy(xs->fq_tmp);
xskq_destroy(xs->cq_tmp);
- xsk_batch_reset(&xs->batch, NULL, NULL, 0);
+ xsk_batch_reset(&xs->batch, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0);
sock_orphan(sk);
sock->sk = NULL;
@@ -1620,6 +1628,7 @@ static int xsk_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
struct xsk_batch *batch = &xs->batch;
struct xdp_desc *descs;
struct sk_buff **skbs;
+ void **data;
unsigned int size;
int ret = 0;
@@ -1638,14 +1647,21 @@ static int xsk_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
+ data = kmalloc_array(size, sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data) {
+ kfree(skbs);
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
descs = kvcalloc(size, sizeof(struct xdp_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!descs) {
+ kfree(data);
kfree(skbs);
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
- xsk_batch_reset(batch, skbs, descs, size);
+ xsk_batch_reset(batch, skbs, descs, data, size);
out:
mutex_unlock(&xs->mutex);
return ret;
--
2.41.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 8:26 [PATCH RFC net-next v4 00/14] xsk: batch xmit in copy mode Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 01/14] xsk: introduce XDP_GENERIC_XMIT_BATCH setsockopt Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 02/14] xsk: extend xsk_build_skb() to support passing an already allocated skb Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 03/14] xsk: add xsk_alloc_batch_skb() to build skbs in batch Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 05/14] xsk: add direct xmit in batch function Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 06/14] xsk: support dynamic xmit.more control for batch xmit Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 07/14] xsk: try to skip validating skb list in xmit path Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 08/14] xsk: rename nb_pkts to nb_descs in xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 09/14] xsk: extend xskq_cons_read_desc_batch to count nb_pkts Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 10/14] xsk: extend xsk_cq_reserve_locked() to reserve n slots Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 11/14] xsk: support batch xmit main logic Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 12/14] xsk: separate read-mostly and write-heavy fields in xsk_buff_pool Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 13/14] xsk: retire old xmit path in copy mode Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 14/14] xsk: optimize xsk_build_skb for batch copy-mode fast path Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260415082654.21026-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox