From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, bjorn@kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 08/14] xsk: rename nb_pkts to nb_descs in xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 16:26:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260415082654.21026-9-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260415082654.21026-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Rename the last parameter to nb_descs for more accurate naming. Next
patch will add a real nb_pkts parameter to help copy mode count how
many pakcets are needed.
No functional change here.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
net/xdp/xsk.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
index 7a6991bc19a8..6cd2e58e170c 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
@@ -485,16 +485,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xsk_tx_peek_desc);
static u32 xsk_tx_peek_release_fallback(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, u32 max_entries)
{
struct xdp_desc *descs = pool->tx_descs;
- u32 nb_pkts = 0;
+ u32 nb_descs = 0;
- while (nb_pkts < max_entries && xsk_tx_peek_desc(pool, &descs[nb_pkts]))
- nb_pkts++;
+ while (nb_descs < max_entries && xsk_tx_peek_desc(pool, &descs[nb_descs]))
+ nb_descs++;
xsk_tx_release(pool);
- return nb_pkts;
+ return nb_descs;
}
-u32 xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, u32 nb_pkts)
+u32 xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, u32 nb_descs)
{
struct xdp_sock *xs;
@@ -502,16 +502,16 @@ u32 xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, u32 nb_pkts)
if (!list_is_singular(&pool->xsk_tx_list)) {
/* Fallback to the non-batched version */
rcu_read_unlock();
- return xsk_tx_peek_release_fallback(pool, nb_pkts);
+ return xsk_tx_peek_release_fallback(pool, nb_descs);
}
xs = list_first_or_null_rcu(&pool->xsk_tx_list, struct xdp_sock, tx_list);
if (!xs) {
- nb_pkts = 0;
+ nb_descs = 0;
goto out;
}
- nb_pkts = xskq_cons_nb_entries(xs->tx, nb_pkts);
+ nb_descs = xskq_cons_nb_entries(xs->tx, nb_descs);
/* This is the backpressure mechanism for the Tx path. Try to
* reserve space in the completion queue for all packets, but
@@ -519,23 +519,23 @@ u32 xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, u32 nb_pkts)
* packets. This avoids having to implement any buffering in
* the Tx path.
*/
- nb_pkts = xskq_prod_nb_free(pool->cq, nb_pkts);
- if (!nb_pkts)
+ nb_descs = xskq_prod_nb_free(pool->cq, nb_descs);
+ if (!nb_descs)
goto out;
- nb_pkts = xskq_cons_read_desc_batch(xs->tx, pool, nb_pkts);
- if (!nb_pkts) {
+ nb_descs = xskq_cons_read_desc_batch(xs->tx, pool, nb_descs);
+ if (!nb_descs) {
xs->tx->queue_empty_descs++;
goto out;
}
__xskq_cons_release(xs->tx);
- xskq_prod_write_addr_batch(pool->cq, pool->tx_descs, nb_pkts);
+ xskq_prod_write_addr_batch(pool->cq, pool->tx_descs, nb_descs);
xs->sk.sk_write_space(&xs->sk);
out:
rcu_read_unlock();
- return nb_pkts;
+ return nb_descs;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch);
--
2.41.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 8:26 [PATCH RFC net-next v4 00/14] xsk: batch xmit in copy mode Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 01/14] xsk: introduce XDP_GENERIC_XMIT_BATCH setsockopt Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 02/14] xsk: extend xsk_build_skb() to support passing an already allocated skb Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 03/14] xsk: add xsk_alloc_batch_skb() to build skbs in batch Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 04/14] xsk: cache data buffers to avoid frequently calling kmalloc_reserve Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 05/14] xsk: add direct xmit in batch function Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 06/14] xsk: support dynamic xmit.more control for batch xmit Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 07/14] xsk: try to skip validating skb list in xmit path Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 09/14] xsk: extend xskq_cons_read_desc_batch to count nb_pkts Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 10/14] xsk: extend xsk_cq_reserve_locked() to reserve n slots Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 11/14] xsk: support batch xmit main logic Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 12/14] xsk: separate read-mostly and write-heavy fields in xsk_buff_pool Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 13/14] xsk: retire old xmit path in copy mode Jason Xing
2026-04-15 8:26 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 14/14] xsk: optimize xsk_build_skb for batch copy-mode fast path Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260415082654.21026-9-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox