From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vsrama-krishna.nemani@broadcom.com,
bhargava.marreddy@broadcom.com, rajashekar.hudumula@broadcom.com,
ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, dharmender.garg@broadcom.com,
rahul-rg.gupta@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] bnge: fix initial HWRM sequence
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 07:42:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260417074254.42f01fa7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHLZf_voEPTrfkuO6pJcchaQaOqJin8m7j-+hwMrjJcGFmJv0A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:46:08 +0530 Vikas Gupta wrote:
> > > -err_func_unrgtr:
> > > - bnge_fw_unregister_dev(bd);
> > > +err_free_ctx_mem:
> > > + bnge_free_ctx_mem(bd);
> > > return rc;
> > > }
> >
> > This error path appears to have the same regression. If
> > bnge_hwrm_func_drv_rgtr() fails after bnge_func_qcaps() has already
> > configured the backing store, freeing the context memory directly without
> > unregistering might allow the hardware to access freed memory.
>
> Even if bnge_hwrm_func_drv_rgtr() fails, it is still safe to free the context
> memory at the host because the driver unloads from this point.
Looking closer, indeed, the way bnge_hwrm_func_drv_unrgtr() is written
the AI suggestion is pointless. Hopefully you're right cause debugging
FW corrupting host memory after reboot on bnxt is not fun.
> AI reviews appear to ignore logic related to handling context memory
> in the patch.
> I see no valid comments on the patch.
Why is bnge_func_qcaps() allocating context mem? It may be the case
that context mem has to be allocated but bnge_func_qcaps() doesn't
sound like a function that'd perform such key part of init.
Why not just move the alloc earlier in bnge_fw_register_dev() ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-17 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 15:16 [PATCH net v2 0/2] bnge fixes Vikas Gupta
2026-04-15 15:16 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] bnge: fix initial HWRM sequence Vikas Gupta
2026-04-17 2:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-17 6:16 ` Vikas Gupta
2026-04-17 14:42 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-04-17 15:47 ` Vikas Gupta
2026-04-15 15:16 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] bnge: remove unsupported backing store type Vikas Gupta
2026-04-16 3:54 ` Przemek Kitszel
2026-04-16 5:22 ` Vikas Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260417074254.42f01fa7@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bhargava.marreddy@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dharmender.garg@broadcom.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rahul-rg.gupta@broadcom.com \
--cc=rajashekar.hudumula@broadcom.com \
--cc=vikas.gupta@broadcom.com \
--cc=vsrama-krishna.nemani@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox