public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf v2 0/3] bpf: prevent offloaded programs from running on host via tcx/netkit
@ 2026-04-24 10:41 Jiayuan Chen
  2026-04-24 10:41 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/3] bpf, tcx: reject offloaded programs on attach Jiayuan Chen
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jiayuan Chen @ 2026-04-24 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: Jiayuan Chen, Daniel Borkmann, Nikolay Aleksandrov, Andrew Lunn,
	David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	Martin KaFai Lau, John Fastabend, Stanislav Fomichev,
	Alexei Starovoitov, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, Jiri Olsa,
	Simon Horman, Jesper Dangaard Brouer, Willem de Bruijn,
	Samiullah Khawaja, Hangbin Liu, Krishna Kumar, Kuniyuki Iwashima,
	Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, netdev, linux-kernel

Yinhao reported a splat [1] when attaching a BPF program loaded with
prog_ifindex (targeted at an offload-capable device such as netdevsim)
to the software path via BPF_TCX_EGRESS. The program's bpf_func had
already been replaced by bpf_prog_warn_on_exec() during offload compile,
so the first packet that reaches tcx_run() trips the WARN:

[   19.592982] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   19.594654] attempt to execute device eBPF program on the host!
[   19.594659] WARNING: kernel/bpf/offload.c:420 at 0x0, CPU#0: poc/337
[   19.599906] Modules linked in:
[   19.600680] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 337 Comm: poc Not tainted
6.18.0-rc7-next-20251125 #10 PREEMPT(none)
[   19.601659] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX,
1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
[   19.602684] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_warn_on_exec+0xc/0x20
[   19.603241] Code: 28 00 48 89 ef e8 74 44 2f 00 eb d7 66 90 90 90 90
90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8d 3d a4 eb 95
06 <67> 48 0f b9 3a 31 c0 e9 83 76 44 ff 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 90
[   19.605093] RSP: 0018:ffff8881066e73d8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[   19.605663] RAX: ffffffff81cbca70 RBX: ffff8881013c4210 RCX:
0000000000000004
[   19.606378] RDX: 1ffff11020278842 RSI: ffffc90000563060 RDI:
ffffffff8861b620
[   19.607107] RBP: ffff8881010d0640 R08: ffff8881013c4210 R09:
ffff8881010d06b0
[   19.607827] R10: ffff8881010d06c3 R11: ffffc90000563000 R12:
ffffc90000563000
[   19.608751] R13: ffff8881010d06b4 R14: ffff888115eb1a34 R15:
dffffc0000000000
[   19.609478] FS:  000000000294c380(0000) GS:ffff8881911e9000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[   19.610316] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[   19.610943] CR2: 000057f6b9eb38c0 CR3: 00000001010ea000 CR4:
0000000000750ef0
[   19.611712] PKRU: 55555554
[   19.612006] Call Trace:
[   19.612281]  <TASK>
[   19.612523]  __dev_queue_xmit+0x22cb/0x3530
[   19.617607]  ip_finish_output2+0x621/0x1a60
[   19.621371]  ip_output+0x170/0x2e0
[   19.624586]  ip_send_skb+0x129/0x180
[   19.624940]  udp_send_skb+0x65d/0x1300
[   19.625316]  udp_sendmsg+0x13bf/0x2000
[   19.629960]  __sys_sendto+0x396/0x470
[   19.633720]  __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0
[   19.635066]  do_syscall_64+0x76/0x10a0
[   19.641701]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[   19.642240] RIP: 0033:0x4240d7
[   19.642597] Code: 00 89 01 e9 c1 fe ff ff e8 f6 03 00 00 66 0f 1f 44
00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 8d 3f 09 00 00 41 89 ca 74 10 b8 2c 00 00 00 0f
05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 69 c3 55 48 89 e5 53 48 83 ec 38 44 89 4d d0
[   19.646088] RSP: 002b:00007fffcb9ecb68 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX:
000000000000002c
[   19.648938] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX:
00000000004240d7
[   19.652116] RDX: 0000000000000008 RSI: 00007fffcb9ecce0 RDI:
0000000000000005
[   19.653148] RBP: 00007fffcb9eccf0 R08: 00007fffcb9ecbb0 R09:
0000000000000010
[   19.653951] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12:
00007fffcb9ece08
[   19.654760] R13: 00007fffcb9ece18 R14: 00000000004b2868 R15:
0000000000000001
[   19.657462]  </TASK>
[   19.657703] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

The reason is that tcx and netkit never checked for offloaded programs
on attach, unlike XDP which already rejects this in dev_xdp_attach().
While auditing the other link entry points, bpf_xdp_link_update() turned
out to have the same gap: it calls dev_xdp_install() directly and skips
the dev_xdp_attach() offload check, so an XDP link created in SKB/native
mode can still be swapped to an offloaded program via BPF_LINK_UPDATE.

This series adds the same guard to all three so offloaded programs can't
be attached to (or swapped into) the software path.

v1 -> v2:
  - tcx/netkit: also reject offloaded progs in the link update callback
    (tcx_link_update/netkit_link_update), not just attach; pointed out
    by the AI review on v1.
  - Add patch 3/3 for the same hole in bpf_xdp_link_update().

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260423033609.252464-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev/

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/64d8e2b5-a214-4f3c-b9e8-bcedbcb2c602@hust.edu.cn/

Jiayuan Chen (3):
  bpf, tcx: reject offloaded programs on attach
  bpf, netkit: reject offloaded programs on attach
  bpf, xdp: reject offloaded programs on link update

 drivers/net/netkit.c | 9 +++++++++
 kernel/bpf/tcx.c     | 9 +++++++++
 net/core/dev.c       | 5 +++++
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)

-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-24 13:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-24 10:41 [PATCH bpf v2 0/3] bpf: prevent offloaded programs from running on host via tcx/netkit Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-24 10:41 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/3] bpf, tcx: reject offloaded programs on attach Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-24 13:57   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-24 10:41 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/3] bpf, netkit: " Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-24 10:41 ` [PATCH bpf v2 3/3] bpf, xdp: reject offloaded programs on link update Jiayuan Chen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox