* [PATCH net v3] net/mlx5: don't printk garbage when transceiver overheats
@ 2026-05-16 6:10 Will Mortensen
2026-05-18 11:25 ` Leon Romanovsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Will Mortensen @ 2026-05-16 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Saeed Mahameed, Leon Romanovsky, Tariq Toukan, Mark Bloch, netdev
Cc: Shahar Shitrit, Carolina Jubran, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman,
linux-rdma, Jeremy Royal, Will Mortensen
When the mlx5 driver processes a temperature warning event, in events.c
and hwmon.c, temp_warn() calls print_sensor_names_in_bit_set(), which
calls hwmon_get_sensor_name() to get the NUL-terminated name of the
relevant sensor, and then prints it to dmesg. In particular,
print_sensor_names_in_bit_set() passes the bit index ("sensor index")
within the 128-bit vector in the warning event to
hwmon_get_sensor_name(). But hwmon_get_sensor_name() was expecting the
index of the hwmon channel, and the driver registers hwmon channels for
at most only two sensors: the ASIC sensor (sensor index 0) and the
module sensor (sensor index 64 or 65 on a 2-port NIC). So when the
warning event concerned a module, hwmon_get_sensor_name() took the 64th
or 65th element of the likely 2-element temp_channel_desc array and thus
returned a pointer to some other kernel memory past the end of it, which
was printed to dmesg up to the first NUL byte.
A further difficulty is that, at least in testing on our CX-8 C8240 with
firmware 40.47.1088, the warning event can have bits set for other
modules, e.g. if this PCI physical function is associated with
port/module 0, we might expect bit 64 to be set, but bit 65 (for port/
module 1) can also be set unexpectedly.
Fix this by clarifying that the argument to hwmon_get_sensor_name() is
the raw sensor index, and correctly converting it to the hwmon channel
index. Return NULL if the sensor index doesn't correspond to a hwmon
channel (e.g. because it's for the other function/port's module).
Fixes: 46fd50cfcc12 ("net/mlx5: Add sensor name to temperature event message")
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Royal <jeremyr@extrahop.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Mortensen <will@extrahop.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Fix ordering of Signed-off-by
- Add target tree name
- Add CCs
- Tweak commit message
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260512-b4-mlx5-sensor-fix-v2-1-531fee4fd7fd@extrahop.com
---
| 2 ++
| 15 ++++++++++++++-
| 2 +-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/events.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/events.c
index 4d7f35b96876..9372551c7f90 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/events.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/events.c
@@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ static void print_sensor_names_in_bit_set(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5
for_each_set_bit(i, bit_set_ptr, num_bits) {
const char *sensor_name = hwmon_get_sensor_name(hwmon, i + bit_set_offset);
+ if (!sensor_name)
+ continue;
mlx5_core_warn(dev, "Sensor name[%d]: %s\n", i + bit_set_offset, sensor_name);
}
}
--git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.c
index afcdebac9c4f..747ff30362f1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.c
@@ -417,7 +417,20 @@ void mlx5_hwmon_dev_unregister(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
mdev->hwmon = NULL;
}
-const char *hwmon_get_sensor_name(struct mlx5_hwmon *hwmon, int channel)
+const char *hwmon_get_sensor_name(struct mlx5_hwmon *hwmon, int sensor_idx)
{
+ int channel;
+
+ if (sensor_idx >= 64) {
+ if (hwmon->module_scount == 0)
+ return NULL;
+ channel = hwmon->asic_platform_scount;
+ if (sensor_idx != hwmon->temp_channel_desc[channel].sensor_index)
+ return NULL;
+ } else {
+ if (sensor_idx >= hwmon->asic_platform_scount)
+ return NULL;
+ channel = sensor_idx;
+ }
return hwmon->temp_channel_desc[channel].sensor_name;
}
--git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.h
index f38271c22c10..b2476bf54ce5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.h
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
int mlx5_hwmon_dev_register(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev);
void mlx5_hwmon_dev_unregister(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev);
-const char *hwmon_get_sensor_name(struct mlx5_hwmon *hwmon, int channel);
+const char *hwmon_get_sensor_name(struct mlx5_hwmon *hwmon, int sensor_idx);
#else
static inline int mlx5_hwmon_dev_register(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
---
base-commit: 6916d5703ddf9a38f1f6c2cc793381a24ee914c6
change-id: 20260508-b4-mlx5-sensor-fix-043d4a22f641
Best regards,
--
Will Mortensen <will@extrahop.com>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net/mlx5: don't printk garbage when transceiver overheats
2026-05-16 6:10 [PATCH net v3] net/mlx5: don't printk garbage when transceiver overheats Will Mortensen
@ 2026-05-18 11:25 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-05-19 7:35 ` Will Mortensen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2026-05-18 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Mortensen
Cc: Saeed Mahameed, Tariq Toukan, Mark Bloch, netdev, Shahar Shitrit,
Carolina Jubran, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, linux-rdma,
Jeremy Royal
On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 11:10:36PM -0700, Will Mortensen wrote:
> When the mlx5 driver processes a temperature warning event, in events.c
> and hwmon.c, temp_warn() calls print_sensor_names_in_bit_set(), which
> calls hwmon_get_sensor_name() to get the NUL-terminated name of the
> relevant sensor, and then prints it to dmesg. In particular,
> print_sensor_names_in_bit_set() passes the bit index ("sensor index")
> within the 128-bit vector in the warning event to
> hwmon_get_sensor_name(). But hwmon_get_sensor_name() was expecting the
> index of the hwmon channel, and the driver registers hwmon channels for
> at most only two sensors: the ASIC sensor (sensor index 0) and the
> module sensor (sensor index 64 or 65 on a 2-port NIC). So when the
> warning event concerned a module, hwmon_get_sensor_name() took the 64th
> or 65th element of the likely 2-element temp_channel_desc array and thus
> returned a pointer to some other kernel memory past the end of it, which
> was printed to dmesg up to the first NUL byte.
>
> A further difficulty is that, at least in testing on our CX-8 C8240 with
> firmware 40.47.1088, the warning event can have bits set for other
> modules, e.g. if this PCI physical function is associated with
> port/module 0, we might expect bit 64 to be set, but bit 65 (for port/
> module 1) can also be set unexpectedly.
>
> Fix this by clarifying that the argument to hwmon_get_sensor_name() is
> the raw sensor index, and correctly converting it to the hwmon channel
> index. Return NULL if the sensor index doesn't correspond to a hwmon
> channel (e.g. because it's for the other function/port's module).
>
> Fixes: 46fd50cfcc12 ("net/mlx5: Add sensor name to temperature event message")
> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Royal <jeremyr@extrahop.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Mortensen <will@extrahop.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix ordering of Signed-off-by
> - Add target tree name
> - Add CCs
> - Tweak commit message
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260512-b4-mlx5-sensor-fix-v2-1-531fee4fd7fd@extrahop.com
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/events.c | 2 ++
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/events.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/events.c
> index 4d7f35b96876..9372551c7f90 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/events.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/events.c
> @@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ static void print_sensor_names_in_bit_set(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5
> for_each_set_bit(i, bit_set_ptr, num_bits) {
> const char *sensor_name = hwmon_get_sensor_name(hwmon, i + bit_set_offset);
>
> + if (!sensor_name)
> + continue;
> mlx5_core_warn(dev, "Sensor name[%d]: %s\n", i + bit_set_offset, sensor_name);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.c
> index afcdebac9c4f..747ff30362f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/hwmon.c
> @@ -417,7 +417,20 @@ void mlx5_hwmon_dev_unregister(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
> mdev->hwmon = NULL;
> }
>
> -const char *hwmon_get_sensor_name(struct mlx5_hwmon *hwmon, int channel)
> +const char *hwmon_get_sensor_name(struct mlx5_hwmon *hwmon, int sensor_idx)
> {
> + int channel;
> +
> + if (sensor_idx >= 64) {
> + if (hwmon->module_scount == 0)
> + return NULL;
> + channel = hwmon->asic_platform_scount;
> + if (sensor_idx != hwmon->temp_channel_desc[channel].sensor_index)
> + return NULL;
> + } else {
> + if (sensor_idx >= hwmon->asic_platform_scount)
> + return NULL;
> + channel = sensor_idx;
> + }
> return hwmon->temp_channel_desc[channel].sensor_name;
Honestly, this approach feels overly complex and fragile for something as
simple as printing to dmesg. In my opinion, you should drop
print_sensor_names_in_bit_set().
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net/mlx5: don't printk garbage when transceiver overheats
2026-05-18 11:25 ` Leon Romanovsky
@ 2026-05-19 7:35 ` Will Mortensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Will Mortensen @ 2026-05-19 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leon Romanovsky
Cc: Saeed Mahameed, Tariq Toukan, Mark Bloch, netdev, Shahar Shitrit,
Carolina Jubran, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, linux-rdma,
Jeremy Royal
On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 4:26 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> Honestly, this approach feels overly complex and fragile for something as
> simple as printing to dmesg. In my opinion, you should drop
> print_sensor_names_in_bit_set().
Do you mean basically revert 46fd50cfcc12 ("net/mlx5: Add sensor name
to temperature event message")? Yes, we could do that. It is
definitely fragile regardless; there are lots of assumptions that
there's at most one ASIC sensor and one module sensor. If we want to
keep the printing, we could simplify by having temp_warn() just print
a static string like "ASIC" or "Module" rather than using the strings
from the firmware, and maybe also call a function in hwmon.c to check
against our module's sensor index in order to ignore events about
other modules.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-19 7:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-16 6:10 [PATCH net v3] net/mlx5: don't printk garbage when transceiver overheats Will Mortensen
2026-05-18 11:25 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-05-19 7:35 ` Will Mortensen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox