From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>
Cc: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
"Mikhail Ivanov" <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>,
konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com, "Tingmao Wang" <m@maowtm.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] landlock: Add UDP connect() access control
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 23:10:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522.reif5feiX0Ce@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260502124306.3975990-3-matthieu@buffet.re>
On Sat, May 02, 2026 at 02:43:01PM +0200, Matthieu Buffet wrote:
> Add support for a second fine-grained UDP access right.
> This first half of LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP controls the
> ability to set the remote port of a socket (via connect()). It will be
> useful for applications that send datagrams, and for some servers too
> (those creating per-client sockets, which want to receive traffic only
> from a specific address).
>
> Similarly as for bind(), this access control is performed when
> configuring sockets, not in hot code paths.
>
> Include detection of when autobind is about to be required, and check if
> the process would be allowed to call bind(0) explicitly. Autobind can
> only be performed when sending a first datagram, when connect()ing, and
> in some splice() EOF edge case which, afaiu, can only happen after a
> remote peer has been set (which is already covered).
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/landlock.h | 19 +++++
> security/landlock/audit.c | 2 +
> security/landlock/limits.h | 2 +-
> security/landlock/net.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++----
> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 5 +-
> 5 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> index 045b251ff1b4..22c8cc63f30e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> @@ -378,11 +378,30 @@ struct landlock_net_port_attr {
> *
> * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP: Bind UDP sockets to the given local
> * port. Support added in Landlock ABI version 10.
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP: Set the remote port of UDP
> + * sockets to the given port, or send datagrams to the given remote port
> + * ignoring any destination pre-set on a socket. Support added in
> + * Landlock ABI version 10.
> + *
> + * .. note:: Setting a remote address or sending a first datagram
> + * auto-binds UDP sockets to an ephemeral local source port if not
> + * already bound. To allow this if both %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
> + * and %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP are handled, you need to
> + * either:
> + *
> + * - use a socket already bound to a port before the ruleset started
> + * being enforced;
> + * - or grant %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP on port 0, meaning "any
> + * port in the ephemeral port range";
> + * - or grant %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP on a specific port, and
> + * call :manpage:`bind(2)` on that port before trying to
> + * :manpage:`connect(2)` or send datagrams.
> */
> /* clang-format off */
> #define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP (1ULL << 0)
> #define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP (1ULL << 1)
> #define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP (1ULL << 2)
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP (1ULL << 3)
> /* clang-format on */
>
> /**
> diff --git a/security/landlock/audit.c b/security/landlock/audit.c
> index e676ebffeebe..851647197a01 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/audit.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/audit.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static const char *const net_access_strings[] = {
> [BIT_INDEX(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP)] = "net.bind_tcp",
> [BIT_INDEX(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP)] = "net.connect_tcp",
> [BIT_INDEX(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP)] = "net.bind_udp",
> + [BIT_INDEX(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP)] =
> + "net.connect_send_udp",
> };
>
> static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(net_access_strings) == LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET);
> diff --git a/security/landlock/limits.h b/security/landlock/limits.h
> index c0f30a4591b8..a4d908b240a2 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/limits.h
> +++ b/security/landlock/limits.h
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
> #define LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS ((LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_FS << 1) - 1)
> #define LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS __const_hweight64(LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS)
>
> -#define LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_NET LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
> +#define LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_NET LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP
> #define LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET ((LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_NET << 1) - 1)
> #define LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET __const_hweight64(LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET)
>
> diff --git a/security/landlock/net.c b/security/landlock/net.c
> index f9ccb52e7d45..045881f81295 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/net.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/net.c
> @@ -68,16 +68,17 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
>
> switch (address->sa_family) {
> case AF_UNSPEC:
> - if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP) {
> + if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP ||
> + access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP) {
> /*
> * Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves
> - * the TCP association, which have the same effect as
> - * closing the connection while retaining the socket
> - * object (i.e., the file descriptor). As for dropping
> - * privileges, closing connections is always allowed.
> - *
> - * For a TCP access control system, this request is
> - * legitimate. Let the network stack handle potential
> + * the remote association while retaining the socket
> + * object (i.e., the file descriptor). For TCP, it has
> + * the same effect as closing the connection. For UDP,
> + * it removes any preset remote address. As for
> + * dropping privileges, these actions are always
> + * allowed.
> + * Let the network stack handle potential
> * inconsistencies and return -EINVAL if needed.
> */
> return 0;
> @@ -134,7 +135,8 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
> addr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)address;
> port = addr4->sin_port;
>
> - if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP) {
> + if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP ||
> + access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP) {
> audit_net.dport = port;
> audit_net.v4info.daddr = addr4->sin_addr.s_addr;
> } else if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP ||
> @@ -157,7 +159,8 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
> addr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)address;
> port = addr6->sin6_port;
>
> - if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP) {
> + if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP ||
> + access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP) {
> audit_net.dport = port;
> audit_net.v6info.daddr = addr6->sin6_addr;
> } else if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP ||
> @@ -213,6 +216,50 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
> return -EACCES;
> }
>
> +static int current_check_autobind_udp_socket(struct socket *const sock)
> +{
> + struct sockaddr_storage port0 = { 0 };
unsigned short num;
bool slow;
> +
> + /*
> + * On UDP sockets, if a local port has not already been bound,
> + * calling connect() or sending a first datagram has the side
> + * effect of autobinding an ephemeral port: we also have to check
> + * that the process would have had the right to bind(0) explicitly.
> + * Note: socket is not locked, so another thread could do an
> + * explicit bind(!=0) on this socket, changing inet_num to non-zero
> + * after we read it, but this would only have us enforce an
> + * additional bind(0) access check and would not bypass policy.
> + */
> + if (inet_sk(sock->sk)->inet_num != 0)
There is still a race condition, this should fix it:
*
* Hold the socket lock around the inet_num read to exclude
* udp_lib_get_port()'s transient inet_num = snum write that is reverted
* to 0 on a failing reuseport bind.
*/
if (inet_sk(sock->sk)->inet_num != 0)
slow = lock_sock_fast(sock->sk);
num = inet_sk(sock->sk)->inet_num;
unlock_sock_fast(sock->sk, slow);
if (num != 0)
return 0;
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Construct a struct sockaddr* with port 0 to pretend the
> + * process tried to bind() on that address.
> + */
> + port0.ss_family = sock->sk->__sk_common.skc_family;
Looking at net/, __sk_common.skc_family (and other __sk_common.* fields)
should be replaced by sk_family (see #define in include/net/sock.h).
Same for all other __sk_common.
In fact, it should be READ_ONCE(sock->sk->sk_family) for consistency
with the net/ code and because the socket are not locked when the LSM
hooks are called. I realized that the existing Landlock code have the
same issue... Could you please add a new patch (to be backported) to
always use this pattern?
> + switch (port0.ss_family) {
> + case AF_INET: {
> + ((struct sockaddr_in *)&port0)->sin_port = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + case AF_INET6: {
> + ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)&port0)->sin6_port = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */
> +
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return current_check_access_socket(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&port0,
> + sizeof(port0),
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP);
> +}
> +
> static int hook_socket_bind(struct socket *const sock,
> struct sockaddr *const address, const int addrlen)
> {
> @@ -234,14 +281,22 @@ static int hook_socket_connect(struct socket *const sock,
> const int addrlen)
> {
> access_mask_t access_request;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (sk_is_tcp(sock->sk))
> access_request = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP;
> + else if (sk_is_udp(sock->sk))
> + access_request = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP;
> else
> return 0;
>
> - return current_check_access_socket(sock, address, addrlen,
> - access_request);
> + ret = current_check_access_socket(sock, address, addrlen,
> + access_request);
> +
> + if (ret == 0 && sk_is_udp(sock->sk))
> + ret = current_check_autobind_udp_socket(sock);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static struct security_hook_list landlock_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> index ec392d971ea3..016c7277e370 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> @@ -1326,12 +1326,13 @@ FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(mini)
>
> /* clang-format off */
>
> -#define ACCESS_LAST LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
> +#define ACCESS_LAST LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP
>
> #define ACCESS_ALL ( \
> LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP | \
> LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP | \
> - LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP)
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP | \
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP)
>
> /* clang-format on */
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-02 12:42 [PATCH v4 0/7] landlock: Add UDP access control support Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] landlock: Add UDP bind() access control Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] landlock: Add UDP connect() " Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-22 21:10 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2026-05-22 21:18 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] landlock: Add UDP send " Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-22 21:10 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] selftests/landlock: Add UDP bind/connect tests Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] selftests/landlock: Add tests for sendmsg() Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] samples/landlock: Add sandboxer UDP access control Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-02 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] landlock: Add documentation for UDP support Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-22 21:11 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-05-06 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] landlock: Add UDP access control support Günther Noack
2026-05-07 22:11 ` Matthieu Buffet
2026-05-22 21:08 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260522.reif5feiX0Ce@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@maowtm.org \
--cc=matthieu@buffet.re \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox