From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, willemb@google.com,
sdf.kernel@gmail.com, ecree.xilinx@gmail.com,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/10] docs: net: netdevices: small fixes and clarifications
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 09:01:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526160151.2793354-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526160151.2793354-1-kuba@kernel.org>
A handful of unrelated nits:
- free_netdevice() does not exist; replace two stray references
with free_netdev().
- The simple-driver probe example fell through into err_undo after
register_netdev() success; add return 0 for clarity.
- Clarify the netdev_priv() paragraph: "(netdev_priv())" was easy
to misread as the thing that needs explicit freeing; spell out
that it refers to extra pointers stored in the device private
struct.
- ndo_setup_tc synchronization note: TC_SETUP_BLOCK / TC_SETUP_FT
actually run under block->cb_lock, not "NFT locks", and rtnl_lock
may or may not be held depending on path.
- ->lltx guidance reads as very outdated, it's not really deprecated.
I suspect people may have been trying to use it for HW drivers
in the past but I can't think of such a case in the last decade.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst b/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst
index 93e06e8d51a9..60492d4df2ee 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst
@@ -21,13 +21,14 @@ by free_netdev(). This is required to handle the pathological case cleanly
alloc_netdev_mqs() / alloc_netdev() reserve extra space for driver
private data which gets freed when the network device is freed. If
separately allocated data is attached to the network device
-(netdev_priv()) then it is up to the module exit handler to free that.
+(extra pointers stored in the device private struct) then it is up
+to the module exit handler to free that.
There are two groups of APIs for registering struct net_device.
First group can be used in normal contexts where ``rtnl_lock`` is not already
held: register_netdev(), unregister_netdev().
Second group can be used when ``rtnl_lock`` is already held:
-register_netdevice(), unregister_netdevice(), free_netdevice().
+register_netdevice(), unregister_netdevice(), free_netdev().
Simple drivers
--------------
@@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ In that case the struct net_device registration is done using
goto err_undo;
/* net_device is visible to the user! */
+ return 0;
err_undo:
/* ... undo the device setup ... */
@@ -73,7 +75,7 @@ In that case the struct net_device registration is done using
Note that after calling register_netdev() the device is visible in the system.
Users can open it and start sending / receiving traffic immediately,
-or run any other callback, so all initialization must be done prior to
+or run any other callback, so all initialization must be **complete** prior to
registration.
unregister_netdev() closes the device and waits for all users to be done
@@ -157,7 +159,7 @@ register_netdevice() fails. The callback may be invoked with or without
There is no explicit constructor callback, driver "constructs" the private
netdev state after allocating it and before registration.
-Setting struct net_device.needs_free_netdev makes core call free_netdevice()
+Setting struct net_device.needs_free_netdev makes core call free_netdev()
automatically after unregister_netdevice() when all references to the device
are gone. It only takes effect after a successful call to register_netdevice()
so if register_netdevice() fails driver is responsible for calling
@@ -256,7 +258,7 @@ struct net_device synchronization rules
lock if the driver implements queue management or shaper API.
Context: process
-ndo_get_stats:
+ndo_get_stats / ndo_get_stats64:
Synchronization: RCU (can be called concurrently with the stats
update path).
Context: atomic (can't sleep under RCU)
@@ -264,12 +266,9 @@ struct net_device synchronization rules
ndo_start_xmit:
Synchronization: __netif_tx_lock spinlock.
- When the driver sets dev->lltx this will be
- called without holding netif_tx_lock. In this case the driver
- has to lock by itself when needed.
- The locking there should also properly protect against
- set_rx_mode. WARNING: use of dev->lltx is deprecated.
- Don't use it for new drivers.
+ When the driver sets dev->lltx this will be called without holding
+ netif_tx_lock. dev->lltx is meant for software drivers only, since
+ they often have no per-queue state.
Context: Process with BHs disabled or BH (timer),
will be called with interrupts disabled by netconsole.
@@ -304,11 +303,15 @@ struct net_device synchronization rules
lock if the driver implements queue management or shaper API.
ndo_setup_tc:
- ``TC_SETUP_BLOCK`` and ``TC_SETUP_FT`` are running under NFT locks
- (i.e. no ``rtnl_lock`` and no device instance lock). The rest of
- ``tc_setup_type`` types run under netdev instance lock if the driver
+ Locking depends on ``tc_setup_type``. For most types the callback
+ is invoked under ``rtnl_lock`` and netdev instance lock if the driver
implements queue management or shaper API.
+ For ``TC_SETUP_BLOCK`` and ``TC_SETUP_FT`` ``rtnl_lock`` may or
+ may not be held, and the netdev instance lock is not held.
+ ``TC_SETUP_BLOCK`` runs under ``block->cb_lock`` and ``TC_SETUP_FT``
+ runs under ``flowtable->flow_block_lock``.
+
Most ndo callbacks not specified in the list above are running
under ``rtnl_lock``. In addition, netdev instance lock is taken as well if
the driver implements queue management or shaper API.
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 16:01 [PATCH net-next 00/10] docs: net: updates for old and cobwebbed docs Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-05-26 22:12 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] docs: net: netdevices: small fixes and clarifications Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] docs: net: fix minor issues with driver guide Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] docs: net: statistics: fix kernel-internal stats list Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] docs: net: update devmem code examples Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 22:17 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] docs: net: fix minor issues with the NAPI guide Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] docs: net: refresh netdev feature guidance Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 18:41 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] docs: net: fix minor issues with checksum offloads Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] docs: net: add Rx notes to the checksum guide Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 18:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] docs: net: render the checksum comment in checksum-offloads.rst Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 18:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] docs: net: fix minor issues with segmentation offloads Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 18:48 ` [PATCH net-next 00/10] docs: net: updates for old and cobwebbed docs Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260526160151.2793354-2-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox