From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, willemb@google.com,
sdf.kernel@gmail.com, ecree.xilinx@gmail.com,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 08/10] docs: net: add Rx notes to the checksum guide
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 09:01:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526160151.2793354-9-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526160151.2793354-1-kuba@kernel.org>
The Rx checksum processing gives people pause. The two main questions
in my experience are:
- what to do with bad IPv4 checksum; and
- what to do with packets with bad checksum.
Folks often feel the urge to drop the latter, to "avoid overloading
the host".
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.rst | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.rst b/Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.rst
index 907aed9f3a3b..d838fe5c1606 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.rst
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ take advantage of checksum offload capabilities of various NICs.
Things that should be documented here but aren't yet:
-* RX Checksum Offload
* CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY conversion
@@ -139,3 +138,19 @@ In Linux, RCO is implemented individually in each encapsulation protocol, and
most tunnel types have flags controlling its use. For instance, VXLAN has the
configuration flag VXLAN_F_REMCSUM_TX to indicate that RCO should be used when
transmitting.
+
+
+RX Checksum Offload
+===================
+
+RX checksum offload is controlled via NETIF_F_RXCSUM. When disabled the driver
+must not set skb->ip_summed on ingress packets. As mentioned, IPv4 checksum
+is not offloaded, the RXCSUM feature controls the offload of verification of
+transport layer checksums.
+
+Note that packets with bad TCP/UDP checksums must still be passed
+to the stack. skb->ip_summed of such packets can be set to ``CHECKSUM_COMPLETE``
+or left at ``CHECKSUM_NONE``. Drivers **must not discard** packets with
+bad TCP/UDP checksum and must not configure the device to drop them.
+Checksum validation is relatively inexpensive and having bad packets reflected
+in SNMP counters is crucial for network monitoring.
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 16:01 [PATCH net-next 00/10] docs: net: updates for old and cobwebbed docs Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] docs: net: netdevices: small fixes and clarifications Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] docs: net: fix minor issues with driver guide Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] docs: net: statistics: fix kernel-internal stats list Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] docs: net: update devmem code examples Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] docs: net: fix minor issues with the NAPI guide Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] docs: net: refresh netdev feature guidance Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 18:41 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] docs: net: fix minor issues with checksum offloads Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 16:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-05-26 18:56 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] docs: net: add Rx notes to the checksum guide Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] docs: net: render the checksum comment in checksum-offloads.rst Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 18:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-05-26 16:01 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] docs: net: fix minor issues with segmentation offloads Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-26 18:48 ` [PATCH net-next 00/10] docs: net: updates for old and cobwebbed docs Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260526160151.2793354-9-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox