* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-25 20:11 [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned Kacper Kokot
@ 2026-05-25 21:28 ` Florian Westphal
2026-05-25 21:44 ` Kacper Kokot
2026-05-25 22:08 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-05-26 13:50 ` kernel test robot
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2026-05-25 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kacper Kokot
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso, Phil Sutter, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, netfilter-devel,
coreteam, netdev, linux-kernel, stable
Kacper Kokot <kacper.kokot.44@gmail.com> wrote:
> Padding TCP options with NOPs is optional, so it is legal to send an
> MSS option that is not aligned to a word boundary and therefore not
> aligned for checksum calculation. The current TCPMSS target is not
> robust to this: when the MSS option is unaligned it produces an
> invalid checksum, and the packet is dropped.
Is this an actual, real world bug? This code is 20+ years old, all that
this hints at is that they are always aligned in reality?
(Not disputing theoretical problem).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-25 21:28 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2026-05-25 21:44 ` Kacper Kokot
2026-05-25 22:08 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kacper Kokot @ 2026-05-25 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso, Phil Sutter, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, netfilter-devel,
coreteam, netdev, linux-kernel, stable
> Is this an actual, real world bug? This code is 20+ years old, all that
> this hints at is that they are always aligned in reality?
No, as far as I know it's theoretical - I just stumbled on it while
debugging something else.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-25 21:28 ` Florian Westphal
2026-05-25 21:44 ` Kacper Kokot
@ 2026-05-25 22:08 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-05-26 9:31 ` David Laight
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Fernandez Mancera @ 2026-05-25 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal, Kacper Kokot
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso, Phil Sutter, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, netfilter-devel,
coreteam, netdev, linux-kernel, stable
On 5/25/26 11:28 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Kacper Kokot <kacper.kokot.44@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Padding TCP options with NOPs is optional, so it is legal to send an
>> MSS option that is not aligned to a word boundary and therefore not
>> aligned for checksum calculation. The current TCPMSS target is not
>> robust to this: when the MSS option is unaligned it produces an
>> invalid checksum, and the packet is dropped.
>
> Is this an actual, real world bug? This code is 20+ years old, all that
> this hints at is that they are always aligned in reality?
>
AFAICS, these issues are not present in real environments as MSS option
is placed at the beginning of the options block making it aligned by
default usually.
I would say this is more for correctness. I wonder, if we are touching
this code, we could use the opportunity to make it use
get_unaligned_be16() instead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-25 22:08 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
@ 2026-05-26 9:31 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2026-05-26 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera
Cc: Florian Westphal, Kacper Kokot, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Phil Sutter,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev, linux-kernel,
stable
On Tue, 26 May 2026 00:08:15 +0200
Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de> wrote:
> On 5/25/26 11:28 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Kacper Kokot <kacper.kokot.44@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Padding TCP options with NOPs is optional, so it is legal to send an
> >> MSS option that is not aligned to a word boundary and therefore not
> >> aligned for checksum calculation. The current TCPMSS target is not
> >> robust to this: when the MSS option is unaligned it produces an
> >> invalid checksum, and the packet is dropped.
> >
> > Is this an actual, real world bug? This code is 20+ years old, all that
> > this hints at is that they are always aligned in reality?
> >
>
> AFAICS, these issues are not present in real environments as MSS option
> is placed at the beginning of the options block making it aligned by
> default usually.
>
> I would say this is more for correctness. I wonder, if we are touching
> this code, we could use the opportunity to make it use
> get_unaligned_be16() instead.
gcc and clang convert x[0] << 8 | x[1] (etc) to the appropriate single
instruction (and maybe byteswap) on cpu that support misaligned accesses.
So there is little to gain from doing it any other way.
-- David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-25 20:11 [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned Kacper Kokot
2026-05-25 21:28 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2026-05-26 13:50 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-26 15:18 ` David Laight
2026-05-26 16:46 ` kernel test robot
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-05-26 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kacper Kokot, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Phil Sutter,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, netfilter-devel, coreteam, linux-kernel
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, netdev, stable, Kacper Kokot
Hi Kacper,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on nf-next/main]
[also build test WARNING on netfilter-nf/main linus/master v6.16-rc1 next-20260525]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kacper-Kokot/netfilter-TCPMSS-fix-dropped-packets-when-MSS-option-is-unaligned/20260526-041308
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf-next.git main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260525201116.407338-2-kacper.kokot.44%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-ltp (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260526/202605261527.v5NoRvES-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260526/202605261527.v5NoRvES-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605261527.v5NoRvES-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c: In function 'tcpmss_mangle_packet':
>> net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:66: warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of '&' [-Wparentheses]
140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
| ^
vim +140 net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c
69
70 static int
71 tcpmss_mangle_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
72 const struct xt_action_param *par,
73 unsigned int family,
74 unsigned int tcphoff,
75 unsigned int minlen)
76 {
77 const struct xt_tcpmss_info *info = par->targinfo;
78 struct tcphdr *tcph;
79 int len, tcp_hdrlen;
80 unsigned int i;
81 __be16 oldval;
82 u16 newmss;
83 u8 *opt;
84
85 /* This is a fragment, no TCP header is available */
86 if (par->fragoff != 0)
87 return 0;
88
89 if (skb_ensure_writable(skb, skb->len))
90 return -1;
91
92 len = skb->len - tcphoff;
93 if (len < (int)sizeof(struct tcphdr))
94 return -1;
95
96 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
97 tcp_hdrlen = tcph->doff * 4;
98
99 if (len < tcp_hdrlen || tcp_hdrlen < sizeof(struct tcphdr))
100 return -1;
101
102 if (info->mss == XT_TCPMSS_CLAMP_PMTU) {
103 struct net *net = xt_net(par);
104 unsigned int in_mtu = tcpmss_reverse_mtu(net, skb, family);
105 unsigned int min_mtu = min(dst_mtu(skb_dst(skb)), in_mtu);
106
107 if (min_mtu <= minlen) {
108 net_err_ratelimited("unknown or invalid path-MTU (%u)\n",
109 min_mtu);
110 return -1;
111 }
112 newmss = min_mtu - minlen;
113 } else
114 newmss = info->mss;
115
116 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph;
117 for (i = sizeof(struct tcphdr); i <= tcp_hdrlen - TCPOLEN_MSS; i += optlen(opt, i)) {
118 if (opt[i] == TCPOPT_MSS && opt[i+1] == TCPOLEN_MSS) {
119 u_int16_t oldmss;
120 u16 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss;
121
122 oldmss = (opt[i+2] << 8) | opt[i+3];
123
124 /* Never increase MSS, even when setting it, as
125 * doing so results in problems for hosts that rely
126 * on MSS being set correctly.
127 */
128 if (oldmss <= newmss)
129 return 0;
130
131 opt[i+2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
132 opt[i+3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
133
134 csum_oldmss = htons(oldmss);
135 csum_newmss = htons(newmss);
136
137 /* MSS may be unaligned; fix up the incremental checksum
138 * to avoid an invalid checksum and a dropped packet.
139 */
> 140 if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
141 csum_oldmss = swab16(csum_oldmss);
142 csum_newmss = swab16(csum_newmss);
143 }
144
145 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
146 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss,
147 false);
148 return 0;
149 }
150 }
151
152 /* There is data after the header so the option can't be added
153 * without moving it, and doing so may make the SYN packet
154 * itself too large. Accept the packet unmodified instead.
155 */
156 if (len > tcp_hdrlen)
157 return 0;
158
159 /* tcph->doff has 4 bits, do not wrap it to 0 */
160 if (tcp_hdrlen >= 15 * 4)
161 return 0;
162
163 /*
164 * MSS Option not found ?! add it..
165 */
166 if (skb_tailroom(skb) < TCPOLEN_MSS) {
167 if (pskb_expand_head(skb, 0,
168 TCPOLEN_MSS - skb_tailroom(skb),
169 GFP_ATOMIC))
170 return -1;
171 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
172 }
173
174 skb_put(skb, TCPOLEN_MSS);
175
176 /*
177 * IPv4: RFC 1122 states "If an MSS option is not received at
178 * connection setup, TCP MUST assume a default send MSS of 536".
179 * IPv6: RFC 2460 states IPv6 has a minimum MTU of 1280 and a minimum
180 * length IPv6 header of 60, ergo the default MSS value is 1220
181 * Since no MSS was provided, we must use the default values
182 */
183 if (xt_family(par) == NFPROTO_IPV4)
184 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)536);
185 else
186 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)1220);
187
188 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph + sizeof(struct tcphdr);
189 memmove(opt + TCPOLEN_MSS, opt, len - sizeof(struct tcphdr));
190
191 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
192 htons(len), htons(len + TCPOLEN_MSS), true);
193 opt[0] = TCPOPT_MSS;
194 opt[1] = TCPOLEN_MSS;
195 opt[2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
196 opt[3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
197
198 inet_proto_csum_replace4(&tcph->check, skb, 0, *((__be32 *)opt), false);
199
200 oldval = ((__be16 *)tcph)[6];
201 tcph->doff += TCPOLEN_MSS/4;
202 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
203 oldval, ((__be16 *)tcph)[6], false);
204 return TCPOLEN_MSS;
205 }
206
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-26 13:50 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-05-26 15:18 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2026-05-26 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot
Cc: Kacper Kokot, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Phil Sutter,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, netfilter-devel, coreteam, linux-kernel,
oe-kbuild-all, netdev, stable
On Tue, 26 May 2026 15:50:00 +0200
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Kacper,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on nf-next/main]
> [also build test WARNING on netfilter-nf/main linus/master v6.16-rc1 next-20260525]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kacper-Kokot/netfilter-TCPMSS-fix-dropped-packets-when-MSS-option-is-unaligned/20260526-041308
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf-next.git main
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260525201116.407338-2-kacper.kokot.44%40gmail.com
> patch subject: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
> config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-ltp (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260526/202605261527.v5NoRvES-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260526/202605261527.v5NoRvES-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605261527.v5NoRvES-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c: In function 'tcpmss_mangle_packet':
> >> net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:66: warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of '&' [-Wparentheses]
> 140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
> | ^
and, of course, the code works fine because 0x1 != 0 is 1.
K (or maybe R) said that with hindsight they should have corrected the
priority of & and | when they added && and || and just fixed all the
existing code so it still worked.
-- David
>
>
> vim +140 net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c
>
> 69
> 70 static int
> 71 tcpmss_mangle_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
> 72 const struct xt_action_param *par,
> 73 unsigned int family,
> 74 unsigned int tcphoff,
> 75 unsigned int minlen)
> 76 {
> 77 const struct xt_tcpmss_info *info = par->targinfo;
> 78 struct tcphdr *tcph;
> 79 int len, tcp_hdrlen;
> 80 unsigned int i;
> 81 __be16 oldval;
> 82 u16 newmss;
> 83 u8 *opt;
> 84
> 85 /* This is a fragment, no TCP header is available */
> 86 if (par->fragoff != 0)
> 87 return 0;
> 88
> 89 if (skb_ensure_writable(skb, skb->len))
> 90 return -1;
> 91
> 92 len = skb->len - tcphoff;
> 93 if (len < (int)sizeof(struct tcphdr))
> 94 return -1;
> 95
> 96 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
> 97 tcp_hdrlen = tcph->doff * 4;
> 98
> 99 if (len < tcp_hdrlen || tcp_hdrlen < sizeof(struct tcphdr))
> 100 return -1;
> 101
> 102 if (info->mss == XT_TCPMSS_CLAMP_PMTU) {
> 103 struct net *net = xt_net(par);
> 104 unsigned int in_mtu = tcpmss_reverse_mtu(net, skb, family);
> 105 unsigned int min_mtu = min(dst_mtu(skb_dst(skb)), in_mtu);
> 106
> 107 if (min_mtu <= minlen) {
> 108 net_err_ratelimited("unknown or invalid path-MTU (%u)\n",
> 109 min_mtu);
> 110 return -1;
> 111 }
> 112 newmss = min_mtu - minlen;
> 113 } else
> 114 newmss = info->mss;
> 115
> 116 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph;
> 117 for (i = sizeof(struct tcphdr); i <= tcp_hdrlen - TCPOLEN_MSS; i += optlen(opt, i)) {
> 118 if (opt[i] == TCPOPT_MSS && opt[i+1] == TCPOLEN_MSS) {
> 119 u_int16_t oldmss;
> 120 u16 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss;
> 121
> 122 oldmss = (opt[i+2] << 8) | opt[i+3];
> 123
> 124 /* Never increase MSS, even when setting it, as
> 125 * doing so results in problems for hosts that rely
> 126 * on MSS being set correctly.
> 127 */
> 128 if (oldmss <= newmss)
> 129 return 0;
> 130
> 131 opt[i+2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
> 132 opt[i+3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
> 133
> 134 csum_oldmss = htons(oldmss);
> 135 csum_newmss = htons(newmss);
> 136
> 137 /* MSS may be unaligned; fix up the incremental checksum
> 138 * to avoid an invalid checksum and a dropped packet.
> 139 */
> > 140 if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
> 141 csum_oldmss = swab16(csum_oldmss);
> 142 csum_newmss = swab16(csum_newmss);
> 143 }
> 144
> 145 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
> 146 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss,
> 147 false);
> 148 return 0;
> 149 }
> 150 }
> 151
> 152 /* There is data after the header so the option can't be added
> 153 * without moving it, and doing so may make the SYN packet
> 154 * itself too large. Accept the packet unmodified instead.
> 155 */
> 156 if (len > tcp_hdrlen)
> 157 return 0;
> 158
> 159 /* tcph->doff has 4 bits, do not wrap it to 0 */
> 160 if (tcp_hdrlen >= 15 * 4)
> 161 return 0;
> 162
> 163 /*
> 164 * MSS Option not found ?! add it..
> 165 */
> 166 if (skb_tailroom(skb) < TCPOLEN_MSS) {
> 167 if (pskb_expand_head(skb, 0,
> 168 TCPOLEN_MSS - skb_tailroom(skb),
> 169 GFP_ATOMIC))
> 170 return -1;
> 171 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
> 172 }
> 173
> 174 skb_put(skb, TCPOLEN_MSS);
> 175
> 176 /*
> 177 * IPv4: RFC 1122 states "If an MSS option is not received at
> 178 * connection setup, TCP MUST assume a default send MSS of 536".
> 179 * IPv6: RFC 2460 states IPv6 has a minimum MTU of 1280 and a minimum
> 180 * length IPv6 header of 60, ergo the default MSS value is 1220
> 181 * Since no MSS was provided, we must use the default values
> 182 */
> 183 if (xt_family(par) == NFPROTO_IPV4)
> 184 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)536);
> 185 else
> 186 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)1220);
> 187
> 188 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph + sizeof(struct tcphdr);
> 189 memmove(opt + TCPOLEN_MSS, opt, len - sizeof(struct tcphdr));
> 190
> 191 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
> 192 htons(len), htons(len + TCPOLEN_MSS), true);
> 193 opt[0] = TCPOPT_MSS;
> 194 opt[1] = TCPOLEN_MSS;
> 195 opt[2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
> 196 opt[3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
> 197
> 198 inet_proto_csum_replace4(&tcph->check, skb, 0, *((__be32 *)opt), false);
> 199
> 200 oldval = ((__be16 *)tcph)[6];
> 201 tcph->doff += TCPOLEN_MSS/4;
> 202 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
> 203 oldval, ((__be16 *)tcph)[6], false);
> 204 return TCPOLEN_MSS;
> 205 }
> 206
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-25 20:11 [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned Kacper Kokot
2026-05-25 21:28 ` Florian Westphal
2026-05-26 13:50 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-05-26 16:46 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-26 23:21 ` Kacper Kokot
2026-05-28 16:31 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-28 18:11 ` kernel test robot
4 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-05-26 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kacper Kokot, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Phil Sutter,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, netfilter-devel, coreteam, linux-kernel
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, netdev, stable, Kacper Kokot
Hi Kacper,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on nf-next/main]
[also build test WARNING on netfilter-nf/main linus/master v6.16-rc1 next-20260526]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kacper-Kokot/netfilter-TCPMSS-fix-dropped-packets-when-MSS-option-is-unaligned/20260526-041308
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf-next.git main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260525201116.407338-2-kacper.kokot.44%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260526/202605261807.YY0PWuhX-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
rustc: rustc 1.88.0 (6b00bc388 2025-06-23)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260526/202605261807.YY0PWuhX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605261807.YY0PWuhX-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:45: warning: & has lower precedence than !=; != will be evaluated first [-Wparentheses]
140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:45: note: place parentheses around the '!=' expression to silence this warning
140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
| ^
| ( )
net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:45: note: place parentheses around the & expression to evaluate it first
140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
| ^
| ( )
1 warning generated.
vim +140 net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c
69
70 static int
71 tcpmss_mangle_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
72 const struct xt_action_param *par,
73 unsigned int family,
74 unsigned int tcphoff,
75 unsigned int minlen)
76 {
77 const struct xt_tcpmss_info *info = par->targinfo;
78 struct tcphdr *tcph;
79 int len, tcp_hdrlen;
80 unsigned int i;
81 __be16 oldval;
82 u16 newmss;
83 u8 *opt;
84
85 /* This is a fragment, no TCP header is available */
86 if (par->fragoff != 0)
87 return 0;
88
89 if (skb_ensure_writable(skb, skb->len))
90 return -1;
91
92 len = skb->len - tcphoff;
93 if (len < (int)sizeof(struct tcphdr))
94 return -1;
95
96 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
97 tcp_hdrlen = tcph->doff * 4;
98
99 if (len < tcp_hdrlen || tcp_hdrlen < sizeof(struct tcphdr))
100 return -1;
101
102 if (info->mss == XT_TCPMSS_CLAMP_PMTU) {
103 struct net *net = xt_net(par);
104 unsigned int in_mtu = tcpmss_reverse_mtu(net, skb, family);
105 unsigned int min_mtu = min(dst_mtu(skb_dst(skb)), in_mtu);
106
107 if (min_mtu <= minlen) {
108 net_err_ratelimited("unknown or invalid path-MTU (%u)\n",
109 min_mtu);
110 return -1;
111 }
112 newmss = min_mtu - minlen;
113 } else
114 newmss = info->mss;
115
116 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph;
117 for (i = sizeof(struct tcphdr); i <= tcp_hdrlen - TCPOLEN_MSS; i += optlen(opt, i)) {
118 if (opt[i] == TCPOPT_MSS && opt[i+1] == TCPOLEN_MSS) {
119 u_int16_t oldmss;
120 u16 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss;
121
122 oldmss = (opt[i+2] << 8) | opt[i+3];
123
124 /* Never increase MSS, even when setting it, as
125 * doing so results in problems for hosts that rely
126 * on MSS being set correctly.
127 */
128 if (oldmss <= newmss)
129 return 0;
130
131 opt[i+2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
132 opt[i+3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
133
134 csum_oldmss = htons(oldmss);
135 csum_newmss = htons(newmss);
136
137 /* MSS may be unaligned; fix up the incremental checksum
138 * to avoid an invalid checksum and a dropped packet.
139 */
> 140 if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
141 csum_oldmss = swab16(csum_oldmss);
142 csum_newmss = swab16(csum_newmss);
143 }
144
145 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
146 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss,
147 false);
148 return 0;
149 }
150 }
151
152 /* There is data after the header so the option can't be added
153 * without moving it, and doing so may make the SYN packet
154 * itself too large. Accept the packet unmodified instead.
155 */
156 if (len > tcp_hdrlen)
157 return 0;
158
159 /* tcph->doff has 4 bits, do not wrap it to 0 */
160 if (tcp_hdrlen >= 15 * 4)
161 return 0;
162
163 /*
164 * MSS Option not found ?! add it..
165 */
166 if (skb_tailroom(skb) < TCPOLEN_MSS) {
167 if (pskb_expand_head(skb, 0,
168 TCPOLEN_MSS - skb_tailroom(skb),
169 GFP_ATOMIC))
170 return -1;
171 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
172 }
173
174 skb_put(skb, TCPOLEN_MSS);
175
176 /*
177 * IPv4: RFC 1122 states "If an MSS option is not received at
178 * connection setup, TCP MUST assume a default send MSS of 536".
179 * IPv6: RFC 2460 states IPv6 has a minimum MTU of 1280 and a minimum
180 * length IPv6 header of 60, ergo the default MSS value is 1220
181 * Since no MSS was provided, we must use the default values
182 */
183 if (xt_family(par) == NFPROTO_IPV4)
184 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)536);
185 else
186 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)1220);
187
188 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph + sizeof(struct tcphdr);
189 memmove(opt + TCPOLEN_MSS, opt, len - sizeof(struct tcphdr));
190
191 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
192 htons(len), htons(len + TCPOLEN_MSS), true);
193 opt[0] = TCPOPT_MSS;
194 opt[1] = TCPOLEN_MSS;
195 opt[2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
196 opt[3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
197
198 inet_proto_csum_replace4(&tcph->check, skb, 0, *((__be32 *)opt), false);
199
200 oldval = ((__be16 *)tcph)[6];
201 tcph->doff += TCPOLEN_MSS/4;
202 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
203 oldval, ((__be16 *)tcph)[6], false);
204 return TCPOLEN_MSS;
205 }
206
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-26 16:46 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-05-26 23:21 ` Kacper Kokot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kacper Kokot @ 2026-05-26 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Phil Sutter, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman,
netfilter-devel, coreteam, linux-kernel, llvm, oe-kbuild-all,
netdev, stable
> AFAICS, these issues are not present in real environments as MSS option
> is placed at the beginning of the options block making it aligned by
> default usually.
I agree, I haven't observed it in any real environment and wouldn't expect to.
I found it by reading the code and had to craft a SYN to reproduce. That said
the spec permits unaligned options and the kernel shouldn't silently drop legal
packets just because nobody sends them today. I can note in the v2 commit
message that this is a theoretical fix.
> > I wonder, if we are touching this code, we could use the opportunity
> > to make it use get_unaligned_be16() instead.
>
> gcc and clang convert x[0] << 8 | x[1] (etc) to the appropriate single
> instruction (and maybe byteswap) on cpu that support misaligned accesses.
> So there is little to gain from doing it any other way.
Happy to go with whichever you prefer for v2.
> and, of course, the code works fine because 0x1 != 0 is 1.
Ha - accidentally correct. I'll add the parens in v2 tomorrow.
Also the reproducer I sent with v1 was clunky. Here's a better
one with some results below:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import argparse
from scapy.all import *
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("target_ip")
parser.add_argument("target_port", type=int)
args = parser.parse_args()
def gen_mss_syn_options(nops=0):
return nops * [("NOP", None)] + [("MSS", 1460)]
def syn_check(opts):
sport = RandShort()
ip = IP(dst=args.target_ip)
syn = TCP(sport=sport, dport=args.target_port, flags="S",
seq=1000, options=opts)
synack = sr1(ip/syn, timeout=1, verbose=False)
send(ip/TCP(sport=sport, dport=args.target_port, flags="R",
seq=syn.seq+1),
verbose=False)
return not not (synack and synack.haslayer(TCP) and
synack[TCP].flags == 0x12)
for i in range(7):
n = 5
ok = sum(syn_check(gen_mss_syn_options(i)) for _ in range(n))
print(f"{i} nops + mss, {ok}/{n} probes responded")
Before:
0 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
1 nops + mss, 0/5 probes responded
2 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
3 nops + mss, 0/5 probes responded
4 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
5 nops + mss, 0/5 probes responded
6 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
After:
0 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
1 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
2 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
3 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
4 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
5 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
6 nops + mss, 5/5 probes responded
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-25 20:11 [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned Kacper Kokot
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-05-26 16:46 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-05-28 16:31 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-28 18:11 ` kernel test robot
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-05-28 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kacper Kokot, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Phil Sutter,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, netfilter-devel, coreteam, linux-kernel
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, netdev, stable, Kacper Kokot
Hi Kacper,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on nf-next/main]
[also build test WARNING on netfilter-nf/main horms-ipvs/master linus/master v7.1-rc5 next-20260527]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kacper-Kokot/netfilter-TCPMSS-fix-dropped-packets-when-MSS-option-is-unaligned/20260526-041308
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf-next.git main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260525201116.407338-2-kacper.kokot.44%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
config: m68k-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260529/202605290016.Qu0UrK4O-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260529/202605290016.Qu0UrK4O-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605290016.Qu0UrK4O-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c: In function 'tcpmss_mangle_packet':
>> net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:66: warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of '&' [-Wparentheses]
140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
| ^
vim +140 net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c
69
70 static int
71 tcpmss_mangle_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
72 const struct xt_action_param *par,
73 unsigned int family,
74 unsigned int tcphoff,
75 unsigned int minlen)
76 {
77 const struct xt_tcpmss_info *info = par->targinfo;
78 struct tcphdr *tcph;
79 int len, tcp_hdrlen;
80 unsigned int i;
81 __be16 oldval;
82 u16 newmss;
83 u8 *opt;
84
85 /* This is a fragment, no TCP header is available */
86 if (par->fragoff != 0)
87 return 0;
88
89 if (skb_ensure_writable(skb, skb->len))
90 return -1;
91
92 len = skb->len - tcphoff;
93 if (len < (int)sizeof(struct tcphdr))
94 return -1;
95
96 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
97 tcp_hdrlen = tcph->doff * 4;
98
99 if (len < tcp_hdrlen || tcp_hdrlen < sizeof(struct tcphdr))
100 return -1;
101
102 if (info->mss == XT_TCPMSS_CLAMP_PMTU) {
103 struct net *net = xt_net(par);
104 unsigned int in_mtu = tcpmss_reverse_mtu(net, skb, family);
105 unsigned int min_mtu = min(dst_mtu(skb_dst(skb)), in_mtu);
106
107 if (min_mtu <= minlen) {
108 net_err_ratelimited("unknown or invalid path-MTU (%u)\n",
109 min_mtu);
110 return -1;
111 }
112 newmss = min_mtu - minlen;
113 } else
114 newmss = info->mss;
115
116 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph;
117 for (i = sizeof(struct tcphdr); i <= tcp_hdrlen - TCPOLEN_MSS; i += optlen(opt, i)) {
118 if (opt[i] == TCPOPT_MSS && opt[i+1] == TCPOLEN_MSS) {
119 u_int16_t oldmss;
120 u16 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss;
121
122 oldmss = (opt[i+2] << 8) | opt[i+3];
123
124 /* Never increase MSS, even when setting it, as
125 * doing so results in problems for hosts that rely
126 * on MSS being set correctly.
127 */
128 if (oldmss <= newmss)
129 return 0;
130
131 opt[i+2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
132 opt[i+3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
133
134 csum_oldmss = htons(oldmss);
135 csum_newmss = htons(newmss);
136
137 /* MSS may be unaligned; fix up the incremental checksum
138 * to avoid an invalid checksum and a dropped packet.
139 */
> 140 if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
141 csum_oldmss = swab16(csum_oldmss);
142 csum_newmss = swab16(csum_newmss);
143 }
144
145 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
146 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss,
147 false);
148 return 0;
149 }
150 }
151
152 /* There is data after the header so the option can't be added
153 * without moving it, and doing so may make the SYN packet
154 * itself too large. Accept the packet unmodified instead.
155 */
156 if (len > tcp_hdrlen)
157 return 0;
158
159 /* tcph->doff has 4 bits, do not wrap it to 0 */
160 if (tcp_hdrlen >= 15 * 4)
161 return 0;
162
163 /*
164 * MSS Option not found ?! add it..
165 */
166 if (skb_tailroom(skb) < TCPOLEN_MSS) {
167 if (pskb_expand_head(skb, 0,
168 TCPOLEN_MSS - skb_tailroom(skb),
169 GFP_ATOMIC))
170 return -1;
171 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
172 }
173
174 skb_put(skb, TCPOLEN_MSS);
175
176 /*
177 * IPv4: RFC 1122 states "If an MSS option is not received at
178 * connection setup, TCP MUST assume a default send MSS of 536".
179 * IPv6: RFC 2460 states IPv6 has a minimum MTU of 1280 and a minimum
180 * length IPv6 header of 60, ergo the default MSS value is 1220
181 * Since no MSS was provided, we must use the default values
182 */
183 if (xt_family(par) == NFPROTO_IPV4)
184 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)536);
185 else
186 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)1220);
187
188 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph + sizeof(struct tcphdr);
189 memmove(opt + TCPOLEN_MSS, opt, len - sizeof(struct tcphdr));
190
191 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
192 htons(len), htons(len + TCPOLEN_MSS), true);
193 opt[0] = TCPOPT_MSS;
194 opt[1] = TCPOLEN_MSS;
195 opt[2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
196 opt[3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
197
198 inet_proto_csum_replace4(&tcph->check, skb, 0, *((__be32 *)opt), false);
199
200 oldval = ((__be16 *)tcph)[6];
201 tcph->doff += TCPOLEN_MSS/4;
202 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
203 oldval, ((__be16 *)tcph)[6], false);
204 return TCPOLEN_MSS;
205 }
206
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-25 20:11 [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned Kacper Kokot
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-05-28 16:31 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-05-28 18:11 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-28 19:40 ` David Laight
4 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-05-28 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kacper Kokot, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Phil Sutter,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, netfilter-devel, coreteam, linux-kernel
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, netdev, stable, Kacper Kokot
Hi Kacper,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on nf-next/main]
[also build test WARNING on netfilter-nf/main linus/master v7.1-rc5 next-20260527]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kacper-Kokot/netfilter-TCPMSS-fix-dropped-packets-when-MSS-option-is-unaligned/20260526-041308
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf-next.git main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260525201116.407338-2-kacper.kokot.44%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260529/202605290221.PE1wkPWQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260529/202605290221.PE1wkPWQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605290221.PE1wkPWQ-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:45: warning: & has lower precedence than !=; != will be evaluated first [-Wparentheses]
140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:45: note: place parentheses around the '!=' expression to silence this warning
140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
| ^
| ( )
net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:45: note: place parentheses around the & expression to evaluate it first
140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
| ^
| ( )
1 warning generated.
vim +140 net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c
69
70 static int
71 tcpmss_mangle_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
72 const struct xt_action_param *par,
73 unsigned int family,
74 unsigned int tcphoff,
75 unsigned int minlen)
76 {
77 const struct xt_tcpmss_info *info = par->targinfo;
78 struct tcphdr *tcph;
79 int len, tcp_hdrlen;
80 unsigned int i;
81 __be16 oldval;
82 u16 newmss;
83 u8 *opt;
84
85 /* This is a fragment, no TCP header is available */
86 if (par->fragoff != 0)
87 return 0;
88
89 if (skb_ensure_writable(skb, skb->len))
90 return -1;
91
92 len = skb->len - tcphoff;
93 if (len < (int)sizeof(struct tcphdr))
94 return -1;
95
96 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
97 tcp_hdrlen = tcph->doff * 4;
98
99 if (len < tcp_hdrlen || tcp_hdrlen < sizeof(struct tcphdr))
100 return -1;
101
102 if (info->mss == XT_TCPMSS_CLAMP_PMTU) {
103 struct net *net = xt_net(par);
104 unsigned int in_mtu = tcpmss_reverse_mtu(net, skb, family);
105 unsigned int min_mtu = min(dst_mtu(skb_dst(skb)), in_mtu);
106
107 if (min_mtu <= minlen) {
108 net_err_ratelimited("unknown or invalid path-MTU (%u)\n",
109 min_mtu);
110 return -1;
111 }
112 newmss = min_mtu - minlen;
113 } else
114 newmss = info->mss;
115
116 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph;
117 for (i = sizeof(struct tcphdr); i <= tcp_hdrlen - TCPOLEN_MSS; i += optlen(opt, i)) {
118 if (opt[i] == TCPOPT_MSS && opt[i+1] == TCPOLEN_MSS) {
119 u_int16_t oldmss;
120 u16 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss;
121
122 oldmss = (opt[i+2] << 8) | opt[i+3];
123
124 /* Never increase MSS, even when setting it, as
125 * doing so results in problems for hosts that rely
126 * on MSS being set correctly.
127 */
128 if (oldmss <= newmss)
129 return 0;
130
131 opt[i+2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
132 opt[i+3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
133
134 csum_oldmss = htons(oldmss);
135 csum_newmss = htons(newmss);
136
137 /* MSS may be unaligned; fix up the incremental checksum
138 * to avoid an invalid checksum and a dropped packet.
139 */
> 140 if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
141 csum_oldmss = swab16(csum_oldmss);
142 csum_newmss = swab16(csum_newmss);
143 }
144
145 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
146 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss,
147 false);
148 return 0;
149 }
150 }
151
152 /* There is data after the header so the option can't be added
153 * without moving it, and doing so may make the SYN packet
154 * itself too large. Accept the packet unmodified instead.
155 */
156 if (len > tcp_hdrlen)
157 return 0;
158
159 /* tcph->doff has 4 bits, do not wrap it to 0 */
160 if (tcp_hdrlen >= 15 * 4)
161 return 0;
162
163 /*
164 * MSS Option not found ?! add it..
165 */
166 if (skb_tailroom(skb) < TCPOLEN_MSS) {
167 if (pskb_expand_head(skb, 0,
168 TCPOLEN_MSS - skb_tailroom(skb),
169 GFP_ATOMIC))
170 return -1;
171 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
172 }
173
174 skb_put(skb, TCPOLEN_MSS);
175
176 /*
177 * IPv4: RFC 1122 states "If an MSS option is not received at
178 * connection setup, TCP MUST assume a default send MSS of 536".
179 * IPv6: RFC 2460 states IPv6 has a minimum MTU of 1280 and a minimum
180 * length IPv6 header of 60, ergo the default MSS value is 1220
181 * Since no MSS was provided, we must use the default values
182 */
183 if (xt_family(par) == NFPROTO_IPV4)
184 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)536);
185 else
186 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)1220);
187
188 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph + sizeof(struct tcphdr);
189 memmove(opt + TCPOLEN_MSS, opt, len - sizeof(struct tcphdr));
190
191 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
192 htons(len), htons(len + TCPOLEN_MSS), true);
193 opt[0] = TCPOPT_MSS;
194 opt[1] = TCPOLEN_MSS;
195 opt[2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
196 opt[3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
197
198 inet_proto_csum_replace4(&tcph->check, skb, 0, *((__be32 *)opt), false);
199
200 oldval = ((__be16 *)tcph)[6];
201 tcph->doff += TCPOLEN_MSS/4;
202 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
203 oldval, ((__be16 *)tcph)[6], false);
204 return TCPOLEN_MSS;
205 }
206
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
2026-05-28 18:11 ` kernel test robot
@ 2026-05-28 19:40 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2026-05-28 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot
Cc: Kacper Kokot, Pablo Neira Ayuso, Florian Westphal, Phil Sutter,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, netfilter-devel, coreteam, linux-kernel, llvm,
oe-kbuild-all, netdev, stable
On Fri, 29 May 2026 02:11:48 +0800
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Kacper,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on nf-next/main]
> [also build test WARNING on netfilter-nf/main linus/master v7.1-rc5 next-20260527]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kacper-Kokot/netfilter-TCPMSS-fix-dropped-packets-when-MSS-option-is-unaligned/20260526-041308
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf-next.git main
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260525201116.407338-2-kacper.kokot.44%40gmail.com
> patch subject: [PATCH] netfilter: TCPMSS: fix dropped packets when MSS option is unaligned
> config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260529/202605290221.PE1wkPWQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260529/202605290221.PE1wkPWQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605290221.PE1wkPWQ-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:45: warning: & has lower precedence than !=; != will be evaluated first [-Wparentheses]
> 140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:45: note: place parentheses around the '!=' expression to silence this warning
> 140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
> | ^
> | ( )
> net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c:140:45: note: place parentheses around the & expression to evaluate it first
> 140 | if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
> | ^
> | ( )
> 1 warning generated.
This has been noted a lot of times.
While 'unusual' the expression is actually correct (but does need changing).
Mostly because the '!= 0' isn't needed and '0x1 != 0' is 1.
-- David
>
>
> vim +140 net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c
>
> 69
> 70 static int
> 71 tcpmss_mangle_packet(struct sk_buff *skb,
> 72 const struct xt_action_param *par,
> 73 unsigned int family,
> 74 unsigned int tcphoff,
> 75 unsigned int minlen)
> 76 {
> 77 const struct xt_tcpmss_info *info = par->targinfo;
> 78 struct tcphdr *tcph;
> 79 int len, tcp_hdrlen;
> 80 unsigned int i;
> 81 __be16 oldval;
> 82 u16 newmss;
> 83 u8 *opt;
> 84
> 85 /* This is a fragment, no TCP header is available */
> 86 if (par->fragoff != 0)
> 87 return 0;
> 88
> 89 if (skb_ensure_writable(skb, skb->len))
> 90 return -1;
> 91
> 92 len = skb->len - tcphoff;
> 93 if (len < (int)sizeof(struct tcphdr))
> 94 return -1;
> 95
> 96 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
> 97 tcp_hdrlen = tcph->doff * 4;
> 98
> 99 if (len < tcp_hdrlen || tcp_hdrlen < sizeof(struct tcphdr))
> 100 return -1;
> 101
> 102 if (info->mss == XT_TCPMSS_CLAMP_PMTU) {
> 103 struct net *net = xt_net(par);
> 104 unsigned int in_mtu = tcpmss_reverse_mtu(net, skb, family);
> 105 unsigned int min_mtu = min(dst_mtu(skb_dst(skb)), in_mtu);
> 106
> 107 if (min_mtu <= minlen) {
> 108 net_err_ratelimited("unknown or invalid path-MTU (%u)\n",
> 109 min_mtu);
> 110 return -1;
> 111 }
> 112 newmss = min_mtu - minlen;
> 113 } else
> 114 newmss = info->mss;
> 115
> 116 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph;
> 117 for (i = sizeof(struct tcphdr); i <= tcp_hdrlen - TCPOLEN_MSS; i += optlen(opt, i)) {
> 118 if (opt[i] == TCPOPT_MSS && opt[i+1] == TCPOLEN_MSS) {
> 119 u_int16_t oldmss;
> 120 u16 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss;
> 121
> 122 oldmss = (opt[i+2] << 8) | opt[i+3];
> 123
> 124 /* Never increase MSS, even when setting it, as
> 125 * doing so results in problems for hosts that rely
> 126 * on MSS being set correctly.
> 127 */
> 128 if (oldmss <= newmss)
> 129 return 0;
> 130
> 131 opt[i+2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
> 132 opt[i+3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
> 133
> 134 csum_oldmss = htons(oldmss);
> 135 csum_newmss = htons(newmss);
> 136
> 137 /* MSS may be unaligned; fix up the incremental checksum
> 138 * to avoid an invalid checksum and a dropped packet.
> 139 */
> > 140 if (((char *)&opt[i + 2] - (char *)tcph) & 0x1 != 0) {
> 141 csum_oldmss = swab16(csum_oldmss);
> 142 csum_newmss = swab16(csum_newmss);
> 143 }
> 144
> 145 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
> 146 csum_oldmss, csum_newmss,
> 147 false);
> 148 return 0;
> 149 }
> 150 }
> 151
> 152 /* There is data after the header so the option can't be added
> 153 * without moving it, and doing so may make the SYN packet
> 154 * itself too large. Accept the packet unmodified instead.
> 155 */
> 156 if (len > tcp_hdrlen)
> 157 return 0;
> 158
> 159 /* tcph->doff has 4 bits, do not wrap it to 0 */
> 160 if (tcp_hdrlen >= 15 * 4)
> 161 return 0;
> 162
> 163 /*
> 164 * MSS Option not found ?! add it..
> 165 */
> 166 if (skb_tailroom(skb) < TCPOLEN_MSS) {
> 167 if (pskb_expand_head(skb, 0,
> 168 TCPOLEN_MSS - skb_tailroom(skb),
> 169 GFP_ATOMIC))
> 170 return -1;
> 171 tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
> 172 }
> 173
> 174 skb_put(skb, TCPOLEN_MSS);
> 175
> 176 /*
> 177 * IPv4: RFC 1122 states "If an MSS option is not received at
> 178 * connection setup, TCP MUST assume a default send MSS of 536".
> 179 * IPv6: RFC 2460 states IPv6 has a minimum MTU of 1280 and a minimum
> 180 * length IPv6 header of 60, ergo the default MSS value is 1220
> 181 * Since no MSS was provided, we must use the default values
> 182 */
> 183 if (xt_family(par) == NFPROTO_IPV4)
> 184 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)536);
> 185 else
> 186 newmss = min(newmss, (u16)1220);
> 187
> 188 opt = (u_int8_t *)tcph + sizeof(struct tcphdr);
> 189 memmove(opt + TCPOLEN_MSS, opt, len - sizeof(struct tcphdr));
> 190
> 191 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
> 192 htons(len), htons(len + TCPOLEN_MSS), true);
> 193 opt[0] = TCPOPT_MSS;
> 194 opt[1] = TCPOLEN_MSS;
> 195 opt[2] = (newmss & 0xff00) >> 8;
> 196 opt[3] = newmss & 0x00ff;
> 197
> 198 inet_proto_csum_replace4(&tcph->check, skb, 0, *((__be32 *)opt), false);
> 199
> 200 oldval = ((__be16 *)tcph)[6];
> 201 tcph->doff += TCPOLEN_MSS/4;
> 202 inet_proto_csum_replace2(&tcph->check, skb,
> 203 oldval, ((__be16 *)tcph)[6], false);
> 204 return TCPOLEN_MSS;
> 205 }
> 206
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread