* [PATCH v2] mctp: serial: replace memset with zero-initialization
@ 2026-05-30 22:46 Manish Baing
2026-05-31 9:12 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manish Baing @ 2026-05-30 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jk, matt, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, manishbaing2789
Use empty brace initialization (= {}) instead of explicit memset()
to zero-initialize stack memory to simplify the code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Manish Baing <manishbaing2789@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Fixed a compilation error caused by a duplicate variable declaration caught
by the kernel test robot.
drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c b/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c
index 26c9a33fd636..df721ca4e07b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c
@@ -536,13 +536,12 @@ struct test_chunk_tx {
static void test_next_chunk_len(struct kunit *test)
{
- struct mctp_serial devx;
+ struct mctp_serial devx = { };
struct mctp_serial *dev = &devx;
int next;
const struct test_chunk_tx *params = test->param_value;
- memset(dev, 0x0, sizeof(*dev));
memcpy(dev->txbuf, params->input, params->input_len);
dev->txlen = params->input_len;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] mctp: serial: replace memset with zero-initialization
2026-05-30 22:46 [PATCH v2] mctp: serial: replace memset with zero-initialization Manish Baing
@ 2026-05-31 9:12 ` David Laight
2026-05-31 9:36 ` Manish Baing
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2026-05-31 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manish Baing
Cc: jk, matt, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, netdev,
linux-kernel
On Sat, 30 May 2026 22:46:46 +0000
Manish Baing <manishbaing2789@gmail.com> wrote:
> Use empty brace initialization (= {}) instead of explicit memset()
> to zero-initialize stack memory to simplify the code.
>
> No functional change.
Isn't it also entirely pointless?
-- David
>
> Signed-off-by: Manish Baing <manishbaing2789@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Fixed a compilation error caused by a duplicate variable declaration caught
> by the kernel test robot.
>
> drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c b/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c
> index 26c9a33fd636..df721ca4e07b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c
> @@ -536,13 +536,12 @@ struct test_chunk_tx {
>
> static void test_next_chunk_len(struct kunit *test)
> {
> - struct mctp_serial devx;
> + struct mctp_serial devx = { };
> struct mctp_serial *dev = &devx;
> int next;
>
> const struct test_chunk_tx *params = test->param_value;
>
> - memset(dev, 0x0, sizeof(*dev));
> memcpy(dev->txbuf, params->input, params->input_len);
> dev->txlen = params->input_len;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] mctp: serial: replace memset with zero-initialization
2026-05-31 9:12 ` David Laight
@ 2026-05-31 9:36 ` Manish Baing
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manish Baing @ 2026-05-31 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Laight
Cc: jk, matt, andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, netdev,
linux-kernel
Hi David,
I understand that this might just be unnecessary churn for the
networking subsystem, and I am perfectly fine dropping the patch if
that is the case.
However, for my own learning, I would love to get your perspective on
this. I was carrying over a pattern from recent cleanups in the IIO
subsystem [1],
as empty brace initialization was noted as the preferred approach in
those discussions (including by Kees Cook [2]).
Is the reasoning behind that recommendation just not applicable to
netdev,or is the policy here strictly against code churn unless it
fixes a tangible bug?
Thanks for the guidance.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611-iio-zero-init-stack-with-instead-of-memset-v1-0-ebb2d0a24302@baylibre.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/202505090942.48EBF01B@keescook/
Regards,
Manish
On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 2:42 PM David Laight
<david.laight.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 May 2026 22:46:46 +0000
> Manish Baing <manishbaing2789@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Use empty brace initialization (= {}) instead of explicit memset()
> > to zero-initialize stack memory to simplify the code.
> >
> > No functional change.
>
> Isn't it also entirely pointless?
>
> -- David
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manish Baing <manishbaing2789@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Fixed a compilation error caused by a duplicate variable declaration caught
> > by the kernel test robot.
> >
> > drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c b/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c
> > index 26c9a33fd636..df721ca4e07b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mctp/mctp-serial.c
> > @@ -536,13 +536,12 @@ struct test_chunk_tx {
> >
> > static void test_next_chunk_len(struct kunit *test)
> > {
> > - struct mctp_serial devx;
> > + struct mctp_serial devx = { };
> > struct mctp_serial *dev = &devx;
> > int next;
> >
> > const struct test_chunk_tx *params = test->param_value;
> >
> > - memset(dev, 0x0, sizeof(*dev));
> > memcpy(dev->txbuf, params->input, params->input_len);
> > dev->txlen = params->input_len;
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-31 9:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-30 22:46 [PATCH v2] mctp: serial: replace memset with zero-initialization Manish Baing
2026-05-31 9:12 ` David Laight
2026-05-31 9:36 ` Manish Baing
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox