From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
davem@davemloft.net, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com
Subject: [PATCH net v2 1/3] net: phy: clean the sfp upstream if phy probing fails
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 10:40:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260601084029.815461-2-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601084029.815461-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Sashiko reported that we don't call sfp_bus_del_upstream() in the probe
failure path, so let's add it, otherwise the sfp-bus is left with a
dangling 'upstream' field, that may be used later on during SFP events.
This issue existed before the generic phylib sfp support, back when
drivers were calling phy_sfp_probe themselves.
Fixes: 298e54fa810e ("net: phy: add core phylib sfp support")
Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
---
V2: Null-ify phydev->sfp_bus upon sfp_bus_add_upstream failure
drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
index 3370eb822017..6ccbfacf7d1d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
@@ -1718,6 +1718,9 @@ static int phy_sfp_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
ret = sfp_bus_add_upstream(bus, phydev, &sfp_phydev_ops);
sfp_bus_put(bus);
+
+ if (ret)
+ phydev->sfp_bus = NULL;
}
if (!ret && phydev->sfp_bus)
@@ -3775,6 +3778,9 @@ static int phy_probe(struct device *dev)
return 0;
out:
+ sfp_bus_del_upstream(phydev->sfp_bus);
+ phydev->sfp_bus = NULL;
+
if (!phydev->is_on_sfp_module)
phy_led_triggers_unregister(phydev);
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 8:40 [PATCH net v2 0/3] net: phy: some cleanups following phy_port SFP Maxime Chevallier
2026-06-01 8:40 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2026-06-01 9:31 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] net: phy: clean the sfp upstream if phy probing fails Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-06-01 8:40 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] net: phy: remove phy ports upon probe failure Maxime Chevallier
2026-06-01 9:31 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-06-04 8:02 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-06-04 8:13 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-06-04 2:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-04 7:26 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-06-01 8:40 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] net: phy: don't try to setup PHY-driven SFP cages when using genphy Maxime Chevallier
2026-06-01 9:32 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-06-04 2:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-04 7:28 ` Maxime Chevallier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260601084029.815461-2-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox