From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: oscmaes92@gmail.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew@lunn.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] pcnet32: stop holding device spin lock during napi_complete_done
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 19:44:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602024428.1664921-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528140320.5556-1-oscmaes92@gmail.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
pcnet32: stop holding device spin lock during napi_complete_done
This commit removes the lp->lock spinlock hold around napi_complete_done()
to avoid a potential deadlock with pcnet32_start_xmit() if a GRO flush
were to occur.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c
> index 911808ab13a79..4f3076d4ea34e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/pcnet32.c
> @@ -1407,8 +1407,10 @@ static int pcnet32_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> pcnet32_restart(dev, CSR0_START);
> netif_wake_queue(dev);
> }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->lock, flags);
>
> if (work_done < budget && napi_complete_done(napi, work_done)) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lp->lock, flags);
[Severity: High]
Does dropping the spinlock before napi_complete_done() introduce a race
condition with shared IRQs that breaks NAPI interrupt mitigation?
If napi_complete_done() clears the NAPIF_STATE_SCHED bit, marking the
NAPI poll as complete, a shared IRQ could fire on another CPU.
If pcnet32_interrupt() then acquires lp->lock and checks csr0 without
checking the INTR bit, could it process pending events and successfully
call napi_schedule_prep()?
If pcnet32_interrupt() schedules NAPI and releases the lock, this code
would then resume, re-acquire lp->lock, and unconditionally unmask
device interrupts.
This could leave the system in a state where NAPI is scheduled but
hardware interrupts are enabled, resulting in an interrupt storm on
every subsequent packet.
> /* clear interrupt masks */
> val = lp->a->read_csr(ioaddr, CSR3);
> val &= 0x00ff;
> @@ -1416,9 +1418,9 @@ static int pcnet32_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>
> /* Set interrupt enable. */
> lp->a->write_csr(ioaddr, CSR0, CSR0_INTEN);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->lock, flags);
> }
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->lock, flags);
> return work_done;
> }
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 14:03 [PATCH net] pcnet32: stop holding device spin lock during napi_complete_done Oscar Maes
2026-05-28 14:55 ` Alexander Lobakin
2026-05-28 17:07 ` Oscar Maes
2026-05-29 15:21 ` Alexander Lobakin
2026-06-02 2:44 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-06-02 16:41 ` Oscar Maes
2026-06-02 18:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-02 18:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260602024428.1664921-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oscmaes92@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox