* [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] Fix partial copy of non-linear test_run output @ 2026-06-17 9:35 Sun Jian 2026-06-17 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: " Sun Jian 2026-06-17 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover " Sun Jian 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sun Jian @ 2026-06-17 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bpf Cc: netdev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor, song, yonghong.song, jolsa, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, shuah, hawk, john.fastabend, sdf, toke, lorenzo, paul.chaignon, Sun Jian When BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN returns non-linear output and userspace provides a short data_out buffer, bpf_test_finish() can return -ENOSPC before copying the packet prefix or updating data_size_out. Fix this by deriving the linear copy length from the packet layout rather than from the already-clamped copy_size. Add selftest coverage for both non-linear skb and XDP frags paths. Changes in v3: * Keep the fix patch minimal by leaving the existing offset declaration unchanged. * Drop unnecessary memset() calls from the new selftests. * Keep the pass-through TC program and larger test packet for the skb case. pkt_v4 is too small once the short IPv4 input check is accounted for, and the existing packet-access program fails before reaching the partial copy-out path with such a short linear area. Changes in v2: * Fix the Fixes tag to point to the commit that introduced the shared non-linear copy-out logic. * Drop skb-specific wording from the fix commit. * Move the selftest from skb_load_bytes.c to prog_run_opts.c. * Add XDP frags coverage in addition to non-linear skb coverage. v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260616093103.471444-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com/ v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260615073856.152479-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com/ Tested with: ./test_progs -t prog_run_opts -v ./test_progs -t skb_load_bytes -v ./test_progs -t xdp_pull_data -v Sun Jian (2): bpf: Fix partial copy of non-linear test_run output selftests/bpf: Cover partial copy of non-linear test_run output net/bpf/test_run.c | 8 +-- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c | 12 ++++ 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: Fix partial copy of non-linear test_run output 2026-06-17 9:35 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] Fix partial copy of non-linear test_run output Sun Jian @ 2026-06-17 9:35 ` Sun Jian 2026-06-17 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover " Sun Jian 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sun Jian @ 2026-06-17 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bpf Cc: netdev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor, song, yonghong.song, jolsa, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, shuah, hawk, john.fastabend, sdf, toke, lorenzo, paul.chaignon, Sun Jian For non-linear test_run output, bpf_test_finish() derives the linear data copy length from copy_size - frag_size. This only matches the linear data length when copy_size is the full packet size. When userspace provides a short data_out buffer, copy_size is clamped to that buffer size. If copy_size is smaller than frag_size, the computed length becomes negative and bpf_test_finish() returns -ENOSPC before copying the packet prefix or updating data_size_out. Compute the linear data length from the packet layout instead, and clamp the linear copy length to copy_size. This preserves the expected partial-copy semantics: return -ENOSPC, copy the packet prefix that fits in data_out, and report the full packet length through data_size_out. Fixes: 7855e0db150ad ("bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish signature") Signed-off-by: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com> --- net/bpf/test_run.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index 2bc04feadfab..f15c613aaa4e 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -453,12 +453,8 @@ static int bpf_test_finish(const union bpf_attr *kattr, } if (data_out) { - int len = sinfo ? copy_size - frag_size : copy_size; - - if (len < 0) { - err = -ENOSPC; - goto out; - } + u32 head_len = size - frag_size; + u32 len = min(copy_size, head_len); if (copy_to_user(data_out, data, len)) goto out; -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover partial copy of non-linear test_run output 2026-06-17 9:35 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] Fix partial copy of non-linear test_run output Sun Jian 2026-06-17 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: " Sun Jian @ 2026-06-17 9:35 ` Sun Jian 2026-06-17 10:31 ` bot+bpf-ci 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Sun Jian @ 2026-06-17 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bpf Cc: netdev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor, song, yonghong.song, jolsa, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, shuah, hawk, john.fastabend, sdf, toke, lorenzo, paul.chaignon, Sun Jian prog_run_opts already verifies that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN returns -ENOSPC for a short data_out buffer while still reporting the full output size through data_size_out. Add the same coverage for non-linear test_run output. Use pass-through TC and XDP programs with a 9000-byte packet, a 64-byte linear data area, and a 100-byte data_out buffer. The expected output spans both the linear data and the first fragment. Verify that test_run returns -ENOSPC, reports the full packet length through data_size_out, and copies the packet prefix into data_out for both non-linear skb and XDP frags paths. Signed-off-by: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c | 12 ++++ 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c index 01f1d1b6715a..9cc898e6a9f7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c @@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ #include "test_pkt_access.skel.h" +#define NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN 9000 +#define NONLINEAR_LINEAR_DATA_LEN 64 +#define SHORT_OUT_LEN 100 + static const __u32 duration; static void check_run_cnt(int prog_fd, __u64 run_cnt) @@ -20,6 +24,69 @@ static void check_run_cnt(int prog_fd, __u64 run_cnt) "incorrect number of repetitions, want %llu have %llu\n", run_cnt, info.run_cnt); } +static void init_pkt(__u8 *pkt, size_t len) +{ + size_t i; + + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) + pkt[i] = i & 0xff; +} + +static void test_skb_nonlinear_data_out_partial(struct test_pkt_access *skel) +{ + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); + __u8 pkt[NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN]; + __u8 out[SHORT_OUT_LEN]; + struct __sk_buff skb = {}; + int prog_fd, err; + + init_pkt(pkt, sizeof(pkt)); + + skb.data_end = NONLINEAR_LINEAR_DATA_LEN; + + topts.data_in = pkt; + topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt); + topts.data_out = out; + topts.data_size_out = sizeof(out); + topts.ctx_in = &skb; + topts.ctx_size_in = sizeof(skb); + + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.tc_pass_prog); + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); + + ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOSPC, "skb_nonlinear_partial_err"); + ASSERT_EQ(topts.data_size_out, sizeof(pkt), "skb_nonlinear_partial_data_size_out"); + ASSERT_OK(memcmp(out, pkt, sizeof(out)), "skb_nonlinear_partial_data_out"); +} + +static void test_xdp_nonlinear_data_out_partial(struct test_pkt_access *skel) +{ + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); + __u8 pkt[NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN]; + __u8 out[SHORT_OUT_LEN]; + struct xdp_md ctx = {}; + int prog_fd, err; + + init_pkt(pkt, sizeof(pkt)); + + ctx.data = 0; + ctx.data_end = NONLINEAR_LINEAR_DATA_LEN; + + topts.data_in = pkt; + topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt); + topts.data_out = out; + topts.data_size_out = sizeof(out); + topts.ctx_in = &ctx; + topts.ctx_size_in = sizeof(ctx); + + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.xdp_frags_pass_prog); + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); + + ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOSPC, "xdp_nonlinear_partial_err"); + ASSERT_EQ(topts.data_size_out, sizeof(pkt), "xdp_nonlinear_partial_data_size_out"); + ASSERT_OK(memcmp(out, pkt, sizeof(out)), "xdp_nonlinear_partial_data_out"); +} + void test_prog_run_opts(void) { struct test_pkt_access *skel; @@ -69,6 +136,9 @@ void test_prog_run_opts(void) run_cnt += topts.repeat; check_run_cnt(prog_fd, run_cnt); + test_skb_nonlinear_data_out_partial(skel); + test_xdp_nonlinear_data_out_partial(skel); + cleanup: if (skel) test_pkt_access__destroy(skel); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c index bce7173152c6..cd284401eebd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c @@ -150,3 +150,15 @@ int test_pkt_access(struct __sk_buff *skb) return TC_ACT_UNSPEC; } + +SEC("tc") +int tc_pass_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb) +{ + return TC_ACT_OK; +} + +SEC("xdp.frags") +int xdp_frags_pass_prog(struct xdp_md *ctx) +{ + return XDP_PASS; +} -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover partial copy of non-linear test_run output 2026-06-17 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover " Sun Jian @ 2026-06-17 10:31 ` bot+bpf-ci 2026-06-17 14:19 ` sun jian 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: bot+bpf-ci @ 2026-06-17 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sun.jian.kdev, bpf Cc: netdev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor, song, yonghong.song, jolsa, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, shuah, hawk, john.fastabend, sdf, toke, lorenzo, paul.chaignon, sun.jian.kdev, ast, andrii, daniel, martin.lau, eddyz87, yonghong.song, clm, ihor.solodrai [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2858 bytes --] > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c > index 01f1d1b6715a..9cc898e6a9f7 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c > @@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ > > #include "test_pkt_access.skel.h" > > +#define NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN 9000 > +#define NONLINEAR_LINEAR_DATA_LEN 64 > +#define SHORT_OUT_LEN 100 > + [ ... ] > @@ -20,6 +24,69 @@ static void check_run_cnt(int prog_fd, __u64 run_cnt) > "incorrect number of repetitions, want %llu have %llu\n", run_cnt, info.run_cnt); > } > > +static void init_pkt(__u8 *pkt, size_t len) > +{ > + size_t i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > + pkt[i] = i & 0xff; > +} A question was raised on v2 about whether pkt_v4 could be reused by reducing the linear area to ETH_HLEN, rather than introducing a custom init_pkt() with a 9000-byte stack packet. Can't we reuse pkt_v4 here by reducing the linear area to ETH_HLEN? The v3 still adds init_pkt() and the NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN packet, so this doesn't seem to have been picked up. > + > +static void test_skb_nonlinear_data_out_partial(struct test_pkt_access *skel) > +{ > + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); > + __u8 pkt[NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN]; > + __u8 out[SHORT_OUT_LEN]; > + struct __sk_buff skb = {}; > + int prog_fd, err; > + > + init_pkt(pkt, sizeof(pkt)); > + > + skb.data_end = NONLINEAR_LINEAR_DATA_LEN; > + > + topts.data_in = pkt; > + topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt); > + topts.data_out = out; > + topts.data_size_out = sizeof(out); > + topts.ctx_in = &skb; > + topts.ctx_size_in = sizeof(skb); > + > + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.tc_pass_prog); [ ... ] > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c > index bce7173152c6..cd284401eebd 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c > @@ -150,3 +150,15 @@ int test_pkt_access(struct __sk_buff *skb) > > return TC_ACT_UNSPEC; > } > + > +SEC("tc") > +int tc_pass_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb) > +{ > + return TC_ACT_OK; > +} > + > +SEC("xdp.frags") > +int xdp_frags_pass_prog(struct xdp_md *ctx) > +{ > + return XDP_PASS; > +} A related suggestion on v2 was that, once pkt_v4 is reused, the existing BPF program could be reused instead of adding new pass-through programs. Could tc_pass_prog and xdp_frags_pass_prog be dropped in favour of the existing program? The v3 still adds both of these, so this point also seems to be open. --- AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug. See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/27680511802 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover partial copy of non-linear test_run output 2026-06-17 10:31 ` bot+bpf-ci @ 2026-06-17 14:19 ` sun jian 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: sun jian @ 2026-06-17 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bot+bpf-ci Cc: bpf, netdev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor, song, yonghong.song, jolsa, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, shuah, hawk, john.fastabend, sdf, toke, lorenzo, paul.chaignon, martin.lau, clm, ihor.solodrai On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 6:31 PM <bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org> wrote: > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c > > index 01f1d1b6715a..9cc898e6a9f7 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c > > @@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ > > > > #include "test_pkt_access.skel.h" > > > > +#define NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN 9000 > > +#define NONLINEAR_LINEAR_DATA_LEN 64 > > +#define SHORT_OUT_LEN 100 > > + > > [ ... ] > > > @@ -20,6 +24,69 @@ static void check_run_cnt(int prog_fd, __u64 run_cnt) > > "incorrect number of repetitions, want %llu have %llu\n", run_cnt, info.run_cnt); > > } > > > > +static void init_pkt(__u8 *pkt, size_t len) > > +{ > > + size_t i; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > > + pkt[i] = i & 0xff; > > +} > > A question was raised on v2 about whether pkt_v4 could be reused by > reducing the linear area to ETH_HLEN, rather than introducing a custom > init_pkt() with a 9000-byte stack packet. > > Can't we reuse pkt_v4 here by reducing the linear area to ETH_HLEN? > The v3 still adds init_pkt() and the NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN packet, so this > doesn't seem to have been picked up. > > > + > > +static void test_skb_nonlinear_data_out_partial(struct test_pkt_access *skel) > > +{ > > + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); > > + __u8 pkt[NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN]; > > + __u8 out[SHORT_OUT_LEN]; > > + struct __sk_buff skb = {}; > > + int prog_fd, err; > > + > > + init_pkt(pkt, sizeof(pkt)); > > + > > + skb.data_end = NONLINEAR_LINEAR_DATA_LEN; > > + > > + topts.data_in = pkt; > > + topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt); > > + topts.data_out = out; > > + topts.data_size_out = sizeof(out); > > + topts.ctx_in = &skb; > > + topts.ctx_size_in = sizeof(skb); > > + > > + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.tc_pass_prog); > > [ ... ] > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c > > index bce7173152c6..cd284401eebd 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c > > @@ -150,3 +150,15 @@ int test_pkt_access(struct __sk_buff *skb) > > > > return TC_ACT_UNSPEC; > > } > > + > > +SEC("tc") > > +int tc_pass_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb) > > +{ > > + return TC_ACT_OK; > > +} > > + > > +SEC("xdp.frags") > > +int xdp_frags_pass_prog(struct xdp_md *ctx) > > +{ > > + return XDP_PASS; > > +} > > A related suggestion on v2 was that, once pkt_v4 is reused, the existing > BPF program could be reused instead of adding new pass-through programs. > > Could tc_pass_prog and xdp_frags_pass_prog be dropped in favour of the > existing program? The v3 still adds both of these, so this point also > seems to be open. > > > --- > AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug. > See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md > > CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/27680511802 Hi, Thanks for checking this. I tried reusing pkt_v4 and the existing TC program, but they do not fit the skb case this test is trying to cover. For skb test_run, IPv4/IPv6 inputs with a too-short L3 header in the linear area are rejected before bpf_test_finish(). With pkt_v4 and a linear area of ETH_HLEN, the test fails with -EINVAL before reaching the partial copy-out path. If the linear area is increased enough to pass the IPv4 check, pkt_v4 is too small to both trigger the old copy_size - frag_size path and verify that the copied prefix spans the linear data and the first fragment. pkt_v6 has the same issue: after making the IPv6 header linear, only 20 bytes remain in frags. The existing test_pkt_access program has its own packet-access coverage goals and is not just a pass-through carrier. With such a short linear area or small packet fixture, it can fail before the test hits the bpf_test_finish()'s partial copy-out path. A pass-through TC program is therefore a better fit, because it keeps the test focused on the bpf_test_finish() copy-out semantics. For XDP, this object does not have an existing xdp.frags pass-through program, so the small XDP frags program is needed to cover the other caller of the shared bpf_test_finish() path. Thanks, Sun Jian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-17 14:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-06-17 9:35 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] Fix partial copy of non-linear test_run output Sun Jian 2026-06-17 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: " Sun Jian 2026-06-17 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover " Sun Jian 2026-06-17 10:31 ` bot+bpf-ci 2026-06-17 14:19 ` sun jian
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox