Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avinash Duduskar <avinash.duduskar@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
	emil@etsalapatis.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	hawk@kernel.org, yatsenko@meta.com, leon.hwang@linux.dev,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, a.s.protopopov@gmail.com,
	ameryhung@gmail.com, rongtao@cestc.cn, eyal.birger@gmail.com,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	toke@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf: bidirectional VLAN support for bpf_fib_lookup()
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:21:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623025147.1001664-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com> (raw)

This series adds VLAN awareness to bpf_fib_lookup() in both directions.
BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN resolves a VLAN egress to its underlying real device
plus the VLAN tag (XDP programs need this because VLAN devices have no XDP
xmit), and BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT runs the lookup as if a tagged frame
had arrived on the matching VLAN subinterface, for iif policy routing and
VRF table selection.

The independent l3mdev/VRF flow-init fix, patch 1 in v1 and v2, was split
out and merged to bpf separately.

v4 changes what bpf_fib_lookup() returns in one case. v3 left a VLAN
egress that cannot be reduced to a physical device plus one tag (a QinQ
egress, or a parent in another namespace) as best-effort SUCCESS with
the VLAN device's ifindex. In his v3 review Toke asked for a distinct
error code there instead, so an XDP program cannot mistake an unresolved
VLAN egress for a physical one, and suggested the name
BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_VLAN_FAILURE; v4 implements that. The
code is appended after BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_SRC_ADDR (nothing renumbered,
tools/ mirror updated) and is returned only when BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN is
set, so no existing caller can observe it. On that failure params->ifindex
is left at the input, like the input-side failures; a tc or XDP program
that wants the VLAN device's own ifindex re-issues the lookup without the
flag, the recovery path he described.

The reason for a distinct code rather than best-effort SUCCESS: SUCCESS
on an unreducible egress silently blackholed XDP. A redirect to the VLAN
device drops at xdp_do_flush() with no in-band signal to the program;
VLAN_FAILURE makes the unreducible case explicit, and a live-frames
selftest exercises both the redirected and the passed paths. Only the
immediate parent is resolved, so QinQ and foreign-netns are the
unreducible cases; bond, team, TBID and VRF egress resolve, as the
selftest table pins.

Changes v3 -> v4:

- Patch 1: return BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_VLAN_FAILURE for an unreducible VLAN
  egress, leaving params->ifindex at the input.

- Patch 3: the QinQ-egress and cross-namespace-egress arms expect
  VLAN_FAILURE; an escape-hatch arm re-issues without the flag for the
  inner VLAN device's ifindex; and test_fib_lookup_vlan_redirect drives
  live frames (BPF_F_TEST_XDP_LIVE_FRAMES) through the native redirect
  path, asserting a reducible egress is delivered and a QinQ egress is
  passed to the stack. The selftest's VLAN_FAILURE arms are IPv4 only,
  since bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup() restores params->ifindex with the same code
  as the IPv4 path that the arms exercise.

The three other v3 questions Toke marked fine as-is, and v4 keeps them: an
unmatched, down, or cross-namespace tag on input returns NOT_FWDED;
OUTPUT | VLAN_INPUT is rejected with -EINVAL; the BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT
name is kept.

Taking the tag as lookup input follows the approach David Ahern suggested
in the 2021 fwmark discussion:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6248c547-ad64-04d6-fcec-374893cc1ef2@gmail.com/

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260617224729.1428662-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616223426.3568080-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260609172052.81613-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com/

Avinash Duduskar (3):
  bpf: Add BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN flag to bpf_fib_lookup() helper
  bpf: Add BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT flag to bpf_fib_lookup() helper
  selftests/bpf: Add bpf_fib_lookup() VLAN flag tests

 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |  47 +-
 net/core/filter.c                             | 133 +++-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |  47 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fib_lookup.c     | 696 +++++++++++++++++-
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fib_lookup.c  |  36 +
 5 files changed, 930 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)


base-commit: a975094bf98ca97be9146f9d3b5681a6f9cf5ce3
-- 
2.54.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-23  2:51 Avinash Duduskar [this message]
2026-06-23  2:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] bpf: Add BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN flag to bpf_fib_lookup() helper Avinash Duduskar
2026-06-23  2:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] bpf: Add BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT " Avinash Duduskar
2026-06-23  2:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_fib_lookup() VLAN flag tests Avinash Duduskar
2026-06-23  3:39   ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260623025147.1001664-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com \
    --to=avinash.duduskar@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rongtao@cestc.cn \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox