* [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal
@ 2026-07-09 10:16 Fan Wu
2026-07-10 0:23 ` Eddie Phillips
2026-07-12 21:57 ` Arend van Spriel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fan Wu @ 2026-07-09 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arend van Spriel, Kalle Valo
Cc: Franky Lin, Hante Meuleman, Chi-Hsien Lin, Wright Feng,
Chung-Hsien Hsu, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, linux-wireless,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl, SHA-cyfmac-dev-list, netdev, linux-kernel,
Fan Wu, stable
brcmf_fw_crashed() and the debugfs "reset" entry both schedule
drvr->bus_reset, whose callback recovers drvr through container_of()
and dereferences it. The teardown paths free drvr (brcmf_free ->
wiphy_free) without draining the work, so a bus_reset callback pending
or running during removal can outlive drvr.
Cancellation cannot live in brcmf_detach() or brcmf_free(): the work
callback reaches teardown through the bus .reset op (PCIe
brcmf_pcie_reset -> brcmf_detach; SDIO brcmf_sdio_bus_reset ->
brcmf_sdiod_remove -> brcmf_free), so cancelling there would wait for
the running work and deadlock. Arming and the drain must also be
mutually exclusive: a debugfs writer can otherwise schedule bus_reset
after the drain and before the debugfs file is removed in
brcmf_cfg80211_detach(), re-opening the window.
Add a per-bus mutex and route all arming through
brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(), which under the lock skips when the bus is
marked removing. Each bus remove entry calls
brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(), which under the same lock sets removing
and cancels the work. Where applicable the remove entry first stops
the firmware-crash producer: on PCIe mask the mailbox and
synchronize_irq; on SDIO unregister the bus interrupt and cancel the
data worker, which also reports firmware halts through
brcmf_fw_crashed(). The mutex is initialized at bus allocation so it
is ready before any firmware-probe or removal path can reach it. The
SDIO suspend power-off path frees drvr through the same
brcmf_sdiod_remove() and takes the same lock; resume re-allows the work
only on a successful re-probe.
This issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool.
Fixes: 4684997d9eea ("brcmfmac: reset PCIe bus on a firmware crash")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn>
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 13 ++++++++
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h | 6 ++++
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 6 ++++
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 6 ++++
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h | 1 +
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c | 3 ++
7 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
index ac02244a6..c4bb32aec 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
@@ -1043,6 +1043,7 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
bus_if = kzalloc(sizeof(struct brcmf_bus), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bus_if)
return -ENOMEM;
+ mutex_init(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
sdiodev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct brcmf_sdio_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sdiodev) {
kfree(bus_if);
@@ -1102,6 +1103,14 @@ static void brcmf_ops_sdio_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
if (func->num != 1)
return;
+ /* Drain bus_reset before the shared brcmf_sdiod_remove()
+ * teardown, which the SDIO reset callback also reaches. The
+ * data worker can arm bus_reset via brcmf_fw_crashed(); cancel
+ * it first.
+ */
+ brcmf_sdio_cancel_datawork(sdiodev->bus);
+ brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(bus_if);
+
/* only proceed with rest of cleanup if func 1 */
brcmf_sdiod_remove(sdiodev);
@@ -1163,6 +1172,8 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev)
} else {
/* power will be cut so remove device, probe again in resume */
brcmf_sdiod_intr_unregister(sdiodev);
+ brcmf_sdio_cancel_datawork(sdiodev->bus);
+ brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(bus_if);
ret = brcmf_sdiod_remove(sdiodev);
if (ret)
brcmf_err("Failed to remove device on suspend\n");
@@ -1188,6 +1199,8 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
ret = brcmf_sdiod_probe(sdiodev);
if (ret)
brcmf_err("Failed to probe device on resume\n");
+ else
+ brcmf_bus_allow_reset_work(bus_if);
} else {
if (sdiodev->wowl_enabled &&
sdiodev->settings->bus.sdio.oob_irq_supported)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h
index 3f5da3bb6..b606094af 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#ifndef BRCMFMAC_BUS_H
#define BRCMFMAC_BUS_H
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include "debug.h"
/* IDs of the 6 default common rings of msgbuf protocol */
@@ -149,11 +150,16 @@ struct brcmf_bus {
u32 chiprev;
bool always_use_fws_queue;
bool wowl_supported;
+ bool removing; /* device removal in progress; quiesce async work */
+ struct mutex bus_reset_lock;
const struct brcmf_bus_ops *ops;
struct brcmf_bus_msgbuf *msgbuf;
};
+void brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if);
+void brcmf_bus_allow_reset_work(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if);
+
/*
* callback wrappers
*/
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
index fed9cd5f2..b934feb9b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
@@ -1164,6 +1164,35 @@ static int brcmf_revinfo_read(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
return 0;
}
+/* Serialize bus_reset arming (debugfs reset write, brcmf_fw_crashed) against the
+ * teardown drain: the remove path takes bus_reset_lock, sets ->removing and cancels
+ * the work under it, so a racing armer either schedules before the cancel (and is
+ * drained) or observes ->removing and desists.
+ */
+static void brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
+ if (bus_if->drvr && bus_if->drvr->bus_reset.func && !bus_if->removing)
+ schedule_work(&bus_if->drvr->bus_reset);
+ mutex_unlock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
+}
+
+void brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
+ bus_if->removing = true;
+ if (bus_if->drvr)
+ cancel_work_sync(&bus_if->drvr->bus_reset);
+ mutex_unlock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
+}
+
+void brcmf_bus_allow_reset_work(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
+ bus_if->removing = false;
+ mutex_unlock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
+}
+
static void brcmf_core_bus_reset(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct brcmf_pub *drvr = container_of(work, struct brcmf_pub,
@@ -1184,7 +1213,7 @@ static ssize_t bus_reset_write(struct file *file, const char __user *user_buf,
if (value != 1)
return -EINVAL;
- schedule_work(&drvr->bus_reset);
+ brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(drvr->bus_if);
return count;
}
@@ -1408,7 +1437,7 @@ void brcmf_fw_crashed(struct device *dev)
brcmf_dev_coredump(dev);
- schedule_work(&drvr->bus_reset);
+ brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(bus_if);
}
void brcmf_detach(struct device *dev)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
index 8b149996f..3c6775166 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
@@ -1914,6 +1914,7 @@ brcmf_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto fail;
}
+ mutex_init(&bus->bus_reset_lock);
bus->msgbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus->msgbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bus->msgbuf) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1985,6 +1986,11 @@ brcmf_pcie_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
if (devinfo->ci)
brcmf_pcie_intr_disable(devinfo);
+ if (devinfo->irq_allocated)
+ synchronize_irq(pdev->irq);
+
+ brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(bus);
+
brcmf_detach(&pdev->dev);
brcmf_free(&pdev->dev);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
index 8effeb7a7..31e37b0d4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
@@ -4541,6 +4541,12 @@ struct brcmf_sdio *brcmf_sdio_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev)
return NULL;
}
+void brcmf_sdio_cancel_datawork(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
+{
+ if (bus)
+ cancel_work_sync(&bus->datawork);
+}
+
/* Detach and free everything */
void brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
{
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
index 15d2c02fa..3c68ebf8e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
@@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ int brcmf_sdiod_remove(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev);
struct brcmf_sdio *brcmf_sdio_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev);
void brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio *bus);
void brcmf_sdio_isr(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, bool in_isr);
+void brcmf_sdio_cancel_datawork(struct brcmf_sdio *bus);
void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, bool active);
void brcmf_sdio_wowl_config(struct device *dev, bool enabled);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
index 9fb68c2dc..97d65ba36 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
@@ -1271,6 +1271,7 @@ static int brcmf_usb_probe_cb(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo)
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto fail;
}
+ mutex_init(&bus->bus_reset_lock);
bus->dev = dev;
bus_pub->bus = bus;
@@ -1336,6 +1337,8 @@ brcmf_usb_disconnect_cb(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo)
return;
brcmf_dbg(USB, "Enter, bus_pub %p\n", devinfo);
+ brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(devinfo->bus_pub.bus);
+
brcmf_detach(devinfo->dev);
brcmf_free(devinfo->dev);
kfree(devinfo->bus_pub.bus);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal
2026-07-09 10:16 [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal Fan Wu
@ 2026-07-10 0:23 ` Eddie Phillips
2026-07-10 2:21 ` Fan Wu
2026-07-10 19:18 ` Arend van Spriel
2026-07-12 21:57 ` Arend van Spriel
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eddie Phillips @ 2026-07-10 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: eddiephillips, Fan Wu
Cc: Arend van Spriel, Kalle Valo, Franky Lin, Hante Meuleman,
Chi-Hsien Lin, Wright Feng, Chung-Hsien Hsu, David S . Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, linux-wireless, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list, netdev, linux-kernel, stable
On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 10:16:35 +0000 Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn> wrote:
> brcmf_fw_crashed() and the debugfs "reset" entry both schedule
> drvr->bus_reset, whose callback recovers drvr through container_of()
> and dereferences it. The teardown paths free drvr (brcmf_free ->
> wiphy_free) without draining the work, so a bus_reset callback pending
> or running during removal can outlive drvr.
>
> Cancellation cannot live in brcmf_detach() or brcmf_free(): the work
> callback reaches teardown through the bus .reset op (PCIe
> brcmf_pcie_reset -> brcmf_detach; SDIO brcmf_sdio_bus_reset ->
> brcmf_sdiod_remove -> brcmf_free), so cancelling there would wait for
> the running work and deadlock. Arming and the drain must also be
> mutually exclusive: a debugfs writer can otherwise schedule bus_reset
> after the drain and before the debugfs file is removed in
> brcmf_cfg80211_detach(), re-opening the window.
>
> Add a per-bus mutex and route all arming through
> brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(), which under the lock skips when the bus is
> marked removing. Each bus remove entry calls
> brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(), which under the same lock sets removing
> and cancels the work. Where applicable the remove entry first stops
> the firmware-crash producer: on PCIe mask the mailbox and
> synchronize_irq; on SDIO unregister the bus interrupt and cancel the
> data worker, which also reports firmware halts through
> brcmf_fw_crashed(). The mutex is initialized at bus allocation so it
> is ready before any firmware-probe or removal path can reach it. The
> SDIO suspend power-off path frees drvr through the same
> brcmf_sdiod_remove() and takes the same lock; resume re-allows the work
> only on a successful re-probe.
>
> This issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool.
>
> Fixes: 4684997d9eea ("brcmfmac: reset PCIe bus on a firmware crash")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn>
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
> ---
> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 13 ++++++++
> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h | 6 ++++
> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 6 ++++
> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 6 ++++
> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h | 1 +
> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c | 3 ++
> 7 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> index ac02244a6..c4bb32aec 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c
> @@ -1043,6 +1043,7 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
> bus_if = kzalloc(sizeof(struct brcmf_bus), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!bus_if)
> return -ENOMEM;
> + mutex_init(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> sdiodev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct brcmf_sdio_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!sdiodev) {
> kfree(bus_if);
> @@ -1102,6 +1103,14 @@ static void brcmf_ops_sdio_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
> if (func->num != 1)
> return;
>
> + /* Drain bus_reset before the shared brcmf_sdiod_remove()
> + * teardown, which the SDIO reset callback also reaches. The
> + * data worker can arm bus_reset via brcmf_fw_crashed(); cancel
> + * it first.
> + */
> + brcmf_sdio_cancel_datawork(sdiodev->bus);
> + brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(bus_if);
> +
> /* only proceed with rest of cleanup if func 1 */
> brcmf_sdiod_remove(sdiodev);
>
> @@ -1163,6 +1172,8 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_suspend(struct device *dev)
> } else {
> /* power will be cut so remove device, probe again in resume */
> brcmf_sdiod_intr_unregister(sdiodev);
> + brcmf_sdio_cancel_datawork(sdiodev->bus);
> + brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(bus_if);
> ret = brcmf_sdiod_remove(sdiodev);
> if (ret)
> brcmf_err("Failed to remove device on suspend\n");
> @@ -1188,6 +1199,8 @@ static int brcmf_ops_sdio_resume(struct device *dev)
> ret = brcmf_sdiod_probe(sdiodev);
> if (ret)
> brcmf_err("Failed to probe device on resume\n");
> + else
> + brcmf_bus_allow_reset_work(bus_if);
> } else {
> if (sdiodev->wowl_enabled &&
> sdiodev->settings->bus.sdio.oob_irq_supported)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h
> index 3f5da3bb6..b606094af 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #ifndef BRCMFMAC_BUS_H
> #define BRCMFMAC_BUS_H
>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include "debug.h"
>
> /* IDs of the 6 default common rings of msgbuf protocol */
> @@ -149,11 +150,16 @@ struct brcmf_bus {
> u32 chiprev;
> bool always_use_fws_queue;
> bool wowl_supported;
> + bool removing; /* device removal in progress; quiesce async work */
> + struct mutex bus_reset_lock;
>
> const struct brcmf_bus_ops *ops;
> struct brcmf_bus_msgbuf *msgbuf;
> };
>
> +void brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if);
> +void brcmf_bus_allow_reset_work(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if);
> +
> /*
> * callback wrappers
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
> index fed9cd5f2..b934feb9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
> @@ -1164,6 +1164,35 @@ static int brcmf_revinfo_read(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Serialize bus_reset arming (debugfs reset write, brcmf_fw_crashed) against the
> + * teardown drain: the remove path takes bus_reset_lock, sets ->removing and cancels
> + * the work under it, so a racing armer either schedules before the cancel (and is
> + * drained) or observes ->removing and desists.
> + */
> +static void brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> + if (bus_if->drvr && bus_if->drvr->bus_reset.func && !bus_if->removing)
> + schedule_work(&bus_if->drvr->bus_reset);
> + mutex_unlock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> +}
Is this safe in a softIRQ context?
mutex_lock() sleeps until it can get the lock.
> +
> +void brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> + bus_if->removing = true;
> + if (bus_if->drvr)
> + cancel_work_sync(&bus_if->drvr->bus_reset);
> + mutex_unlock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> +}
How about if brcmf_pcie_remove() calls brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(),
takes the lock and calls cancel_work_sync(), sleeps. If debugfs
path is already running, it can invoke the worker thread. Is there
potential that both try to reset?
> +
> +void brcmf_bus_allow_reset_work(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> + bus_if->removing = false;
> + mutex_unlock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> +}
> +
> static void brcmf_core_bus_reset(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct brcmf_pub *drvr = container_of(work, struct brcmf_pub,
> @@ -1184,7 +1213,7 @@ static ssize_t bus_reset_write(struct file *file, const char __user *user_buf,
> if (value != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - schedule_work(&drvr->bus_reset);
> + brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(drvr->bus_if);
>
> return count;
> }
> @@ -1408,7 +1437,7 @@ void brcmf_fw_crashed(struct device *dev)
>
> brcmf_dev_coredump(dev);
>
> - schedule_work(&drvr->bus_reset);
> + brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(bus_if);
> }
>
> void brcmf_detach(struct device *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
> index 8b149996f..3c6775166 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
> @@ -1914,6 +1914,7 @@ brcmf_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto fail;
> }
> + mutex_init(&bus->bus_reset_lock);
> bus->msgbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus->msgbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!bus->msgbuf) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1985,6 +1986,11 @@ brcmf_pcie_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> if (devinfo->ci)
> brcmf_pcie_intr_disable(devinfo);
>
> + if (devinfo->irq_allocated)
> + synchronize_irq(pdev->irq);
> +
> + brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(bus);
> +
> brcmf_detach(&pdev->dev);
> brcmf_free(&pdev->dev);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> index 8effeb7a7..31e37b0d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> @@ -4541,6 +4541,12 @@ struct brcmf_sdio *brcmf_sdio_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +void brcmf_sdio_cancel_datawork(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
> +{
> + if (bus)
> + cancel_work_sync(&bus->datawork);
> +}
> +
> /* Detach and free everything */
> void brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
> index 15d2c02fa..3c68ebf8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h
> @@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ int brcmf_sdiod_remove(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev);
> struct brcmf_sdio *brcmf_sdio_probe(struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev);
> void brcmf_sdio_remove(struct brcmf_sdio *bus);
> void brcmf_sdio_isr(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, bool in_isr);
> +void brcmf_sdio_cancel_datawork(struct brcmf_sdio *bus);
>
> void brcmf_sdio_wd_timer(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, bool active);
> void brcmf_sdio_wowl_config(struct device *dev, bool enabled);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> index 9fb68c2dc..97d65ba36 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c
> @@ -1271,6 +1271,7 @@ static int brcmf_usb_probe_cb(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto fail;
> }
> + mutex_init(&bus->bus_reset_lock);
>
> bus->dev = dev;
> bus_pub->bus = bus;
> @@ -1336,6 +1337,8 @@ brcmf_usb_disconnect_cb(struct brcmf_usbdev_info *devinfo)
> return;
> brcmf_dbg(USB, "Enter, bus_pub %p\n", devinfo);
>
> + brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(devinfo->bus_pub.bus);
> +
> brcmf_detach(devinfo->dev);
> brcmf_free(devinfo->dev);
> kfree(devinfo->bus_pub.bus);
> --
> 2.34.1
Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal
2026-07-10 0:23 ` Eddie Phillips
@ 2026-07-10 2:21 ` Fan Wu
2026-07-10 19:18 ` Arend van Spriel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fan Wu @ 2026-07-10 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eddie Phillips
Cc: Fan Wu, Arend van Spriel, Kalle Valo, Franky Lin, Hante Meuleman,
Chi-Hsien Lin, Wright Feng, Chung-Hsien Hsu, David S . Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, linux-wireless, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list, netdev, linux-kernel, stable
On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 05:23:37PM -0700, Eddie Phillips wrote:
> Is this safe in a softIRQ context?
> mutex_lock() sleeps until it can get the lock.
Thanks for taking a look. I agree this is not the right interface shape.
The current call sites I traced reach brcmf_fw_crashed() from the PCIe
threaded IRQ path or from SDIO workqueue context, but brcmf_fw_crashed()
is a core helper and the reset scheduling path should not grow a hidden
sleepable-context requirement. I will respin this part so the arming gate
does not use a mutex.
> How about if brcmf_pcie_remove() calls brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(),
> takes the lock and calls cancel_work_sync(), sleeps. If debugfs
> path is already running, it can invoke the worker thread. Is there
> potential that both try to reset?
Yes, that is a real issue with this version. The lock only serializes
scheduling against the cancel point. If the reset work has already started,
cancel_work_sync() waits for it, but the worker may already be executing the
bus reset teardown path; remove can then continue and run its own teardown
afterwards.
So the patch needs a stronger state/ownership model than just
schedule-vs-cancel serialization. I will rework it so reset and remove cannot
both own the same teardown sequence, and will send a v2 after auditing the
PCIe/SDIO/USB paths again.
Thanks,
Fan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal
2026-07-10 0:23 ` Eddie Phillips
2026-07-10 2:21 ` Fan Wu
@ 2026-07-10 19:18 ` Arend van Spriel
2026-07-11 5:23 ` Eddie Phillips
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arend van Spriel @ 2026-07-10 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eddie Phillips, Fan Wu
Cc: Arend van Spriel, Kalle Valo, Franky Lin, Hante Meuleman,
Chi-Hsien Lin, Wright Feng, Chung-Hsien Hsu, David S . Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, linux-wireless, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list, netdev, linux-kernel, stable
On 10/07/2026 02:23, Eddie Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 10:16:35 +0000 Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn> wrote:
>
>> brcmf_fw_crashed() and the debugfs "reset" entry both schedule
>> drvr->bus_reset, whose callback recovers drvr through container_of()
>> and dereferences it. The teardown paths free drvr (brcmf_free ->
>> wiphy_free) without draining the work, so a bus_reset callback pending
>> or running during removal can outlive drvr.
>>
[...]
>>
>> This issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool.
>>
>> Fixes: 4684997d9eea ("brcmfmac: reset PCIe bus on a firmware crash")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn>
>> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
>> ---
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 13 ++++++++
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h | 6 ++++
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 6 ++++
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 6 ++++
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h | 1 +
>> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c | 3 ++
>> 7 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
>> index fed9cd5f2..b934feb9b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
>> @@ -1164,6 +1164,35 @@ static int brcmf_revinfo_read(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Serialize bus_reset arming (debugfs reset write, brcmf_fw_crashed) against the
>> + * teardown drain: the remove path takes bus_reset_lock, sets ->removing and cancels
>> + * the work under it, so a racing armer either schedules before the cancel (and is
>> + * drained) or observes ->removing and desists.
>> + */
>> +static void brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
>> + if (bus_if->drvr && bus_if->drvr->bus_reset.func && !bus_if->removing)
>> + schedule_work(&bus_if->drvr->bus_reset);
>> + mutex_unlock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
>> +}
>
> Is this safe in a softIRQ context?
> mutex_lock() sleeps until it can get the lock.
What softIRQ context? brcmf_fw_crashed() is called by PCIe (thread) and
SDIO (worker).
>> +
>> +void brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
>> + bus_if->removing = true;
>> + if (bus_if->drvr)
>> + cancel_work_sync(&bus_if->drvr->bus_reset);
>> + mutex_unlock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
>> +}
>
> How about if brcmf_pcie_remove() calls brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(),
> takes the lock and calls cancel_work_sync(), sleeps. If debugfs
> path is already running, it can invoke the worker thread. Is there
> potential that both try to reset?
What is "both" here?
Regards,
Arend
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal
2026-07-10 19:18 ` Arend van Spriel
@ 2026-07-11 5:23 ` Eddie Phillips
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eddie Phillips @ 2026-07-11 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arend van Spriel
Cc: Fan Wu, Arend van Spriel, Kalle Valo, Franky Lin, Hante Meuleman,
Chi-Hsien Lin, Wright Feng, Chung-Hsien Hsu, David S . Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, linux-wireless, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list, netdev, linux-kernel, stable
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 12:18 PM Arend van Spriel
<arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/07/2026 02:23, Eddie Phillips wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 10:16:35 +0000 Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn> wrote:
> >
> >> brcmf_fw_crashed() and the debugfs "reset" entry both schedule
> >> drvr->bus_reset, whose callback recovers drvr through container_of()
> >> and dereferences it. The teardown paths free drvr (brcmf_free ->
> >> wiphy_free) without draining the work, so a bus_reset callback pending
> >> or running during removal can outlive drvr.
> >>
>
> [...]
>
> >>
> >> This issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 4684997d9eea ("brcmfmac: reset PCIe bus on a firmware crash")
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn>
> >> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
> >> ---
> >> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 13 ++++++++
> >> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h | 6 ++++
> >> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
> >> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 6 ++++
> >> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 6 ++++
> >> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.h | 1 +
> >> .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/usb.c | 3 ++
> >> 7 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> [...]
>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
> >> index fed9cd5f2..b934feb9b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
> >> @@ -1164,6 +1164,35 @@ static int brcmf_revinfo_read(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/* Serialize bus_reset arming (debugfs reset write, brcmf_fw_crashed) against the
> >> + * teardown drain: the remove path takes bus_reset_lock, sets ->removing and cancels
> >> + * the work under it, so a racing armer either schedules before the cancel (and is
> >> + * drained) or observes ->removing and desists.
> >> + */
> >> +static void brcmf_bus_schedule_reset(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if)
> >> +{
> >> + mutex_lock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> >> + if (bus_if->drvr && bus_if->drvr->bus_reset.func && !bus_if->removing)
> >> + schedule_work(&bus_if->drvr->bus_reset);
> >> + mutex_unlock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> >> +}
> >
> > Is this safe in a softIRQ context?
> > mutex_lock() sleeps until it can get the lock.
>
> What softIRQ context? brcmf_fw_crashed() is called by PCIe (thread) and
> SDIO (worker).
Yes, you're right. Since it's thread/worker context, sleeping is fine here.
> >> +
> >> +void brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(struct brcmf_bus *bus_if)
> >> +{
> >> + mutex_lock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> >> + bus_if->removing = true;
> >> + if (bus_if->drvr)
> >> + cancel_work_sync(&bus_if->drvr->bus_reset);
> >> + mutex_unlock(&bus_if->bus_reset_lock);
> >> +}
> >
> > How about if brcmf_pcie_remove() calls brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work(),
> > takes the lock and calls cancel_work_sync(), sleeps. If debugfs
> > path is already running, it can invoke the worker thread. Is there
> > potential that both try to reset?
>
> What is "both" here?
It may be possible that the worker thread is running and then the device is
unplugged, causing a deadlock.
Another possibility here would be to just lock the state change, but both
implementations should are fine.
Best, Eddie
> Regards,
> Arend
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal
2026-07-09 10:16 [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal Fan Wu
2026-07-10 0:23 ` Eddie Phillips
@ 2026-07-12 21:57 ` Arend van Spriel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arend van Spriel @ 2026-07-12 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fan Wu
Cc: David S . Miller, Arend van Spriel, Chi-Hsien Lin,
Chung-Hsien Hsu, Franky Lin, Hante Meuleman, Jakub Kicinski,
Kalle Valo, SHA-cyfmac-dev-list, Wright Feng,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl, linux-kernel, linux-wireless, netdev,
stable
On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 10:16:35 +0000, Fan Wu wrote:
> brcmf_fw_crashed() and the debugfs "reset" entry both schedule
> drvr->bus_reset, whose callback recovers drvr through container_of()
> and dereferences it.
[...]
The patch does not apply cleanly on wl-next/main -- a rebase is needed.
I looked more carefully at the cancel_work_sync-under-lock concern that was
raised in the thread. brcmf_core_bus_reset() never acquires bus_reset_lock,
so there is no deadlock. If the work has already started when
brcmf_bus_cancel_reset_work() is called, cancel_work_sync() waits for it to
finish; by then the reset op (brcmf_pcie_reset) has completed its own
teardown and reinitialized the device, so the subsequent remove teardown acts
on a clean device. The design is correct as submitted; only the rebase is
needed.
Regards,
Arend
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-12 21:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-09 10:16 [PATCH] wifi: brcmfmac: drain bus_reset work on device removal Fan Wu
2026-07-10 0:23 ` Eddie Phillips
2026-07-10 2:21 ` Fan Wu
2026-07-10 19:18 ` Arend van Spriel
2026-07-11 5:23 ` Eddie Phillips
2026-07-12 21:57 ` Arend van Spriel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox