From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
stfomichev@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, bjorn@kernel.org, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net 6/6] selftests/xsk: account reclaimed invalid Tx descriptors
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 15:56:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260719135609.147823-7-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719135609.147823-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Invalid Tx descriptors are now returned through the completion ring,
regardless of whether they form a standalone packet or belong to an
invalid multi-buffer packet.
The selftests previously counted only descriptors belonging to valid
packets, with a special exception for some invalid multi-buffer packets
in verbatim streams. This undercounts completion entries when a
standalone invalid descriptor or another invalid packet is reclaimed by
the kernel.
Keep valid_pkts as the number of packets expected on the Rx side, but
count every descriptor submitted to the Tx ring in valid_frags, as every
such descriptor is now expected to be returned through the completion
ring.
Make fragment counting in verbatim mode follow the packet boundary
instead of stopping at the first invalid fragment. Update custom stream
generation so an invalid middle fragment terminates the generated Rx
packet while Tx completion accounting still covers the complete invalid
packet.
Also add explicit end fragments after invalid middle descriptors. This
exercises the kernel drain logic and verifies that subsequent valid
packets are not interpreted as continuations of the invalid packet.
Reviewed-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c | 26 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
index f0e0f3c4f7a3..4549358cc8c2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_xsk.c
@@ -427,14 +427,14 @@ static u32 pkt_nb_frags(u32 frame_size, struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream, struct pk
}
/* Search for the end of the packet in verbatim mode */
- if (!pkt_continues(pkt->options) || !pkt->valid)
+ if (!pkt_continues(pkt->options))
return nb_frags;
next_frag = pkt_stream->current_pkt_nb;
pkt++;
while (next_frag++ < pkt_stream->nb_pkts) {
nb_frags++;
- if (!pkt_continues(pkt->options) || !pkt->valid)
+ if (!pkt_continues(pkt->options))
break;
pkt++;
}
@@ -665,11 +665,11 @@ static struct pkt_stream *__pkt_stream_generate_custom(struct ifobject *ifobj, s
if (!frame->valid || !pkt_continues(frame->options))
payload++;
} else {
- if (frame->valid)
+ if (frame->valid) {
len += frame->len;
- if (frame->valid && pkt_continues(frame->options))
- continue;
-
+ if (pkt_continues(frame->options))
+ continue;
+ }
pkt->pkt_nb = pkt_nb;
pkt->len = len;
pkt->valid = frame->valid;
@@ -1250,10 +1250,9 @@ static int __send_pkts(struct ifobject *ifobject, struct xsk_socket_info *xsk,
}
}
- if (pkt && pkt->valid) {
+ if (pkt && pkt->valid)
valid_pkts++;
- valid_frags += nb_frags;
- }
+ valid_frags += nb_frags;
}
pthread_mutex_lock(&pacing_mutex);
@@ -2099,13 +2098,16 @@ int testapp_invalid_desc_mb(struct test_spec *test)
{0, 0, 0, false, 0},
/* Invalid address in the second frame */
{0, XSK_UMEM__LARGE_FRAME_SIZE, 0, false, XDP_PKT_CONTD},
- {umem_sz, XSK_UMEM__LARGE_FRAME_SIZE, 0, false, XDP_PKT_CONTD},
+ {umem_sz * 2, XSK_UMEM__LARGE_FRAME_SIZE, 0, false, XDP_PKT_CONTD},
+ {0, MIN_PKT_SIZE, 0, false, 0},
/* Invalid len in the middle */
{0, XSK_UMEM__LARGE_FRAME_SIZE, 0, false, XDP_PKT_CONTD},
{0, XSK_UMEM__INVALID_FRAME_SIZE, 0, false, XDP_PKT_CONTD},
+ {0, MIN_PKT_SIZE, 0, false, 0},
/* Invalid options in the middle */
{0, XSK_UMEM__LARGE_FRAME_SIZE, 0, false, XDP_PKT_CONTD},
{0, XSK_UMEM__LARGE_FRAME_SIZE, 0, false, XSK_DESC__INVALID_OPTION},
+ {0, MIN_PKT_SIZE, 0, false, 0},
/* Transmit 2 frags, receive 3 */
{0, XSK_UMEM__MAX_FRAME_SIZE, 0, true, XDP_PKT_CONTD},
{0, XSK_UMEM__MAX_FRAME_SIZE, 0, true, 0},
@@ -2117,8 +2119,8 @@ int testapp_invalid_desc_mb(struct test_spec *test)
if (umem->unaligned_mode) {
/* Crossing a chunk boundary allowed */
- pkts[12].valid = true;
- pkts[13].valid = true;
+ pkts[15].valid = true;
+ pkts[16].valid = true;
}
test->mtu = MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-19 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-19 13:56 [PATCH v4 net 0/6] xsk: fix AF_XDP multi-buffer Tx descriptor reclaim Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 1/6] xsk: fix buffer leak in xsk_drop_skb() for AF_XDP multi-buffer Tx Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 2/6] xsk: drain continuation descs after overflow in xsk_build_skb() Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 3/6] xsk: provide sufficient space in pool->tx_descs Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 4/6] xsk: reclaim invalid Tx descriptors in ZC batch path Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 5/6] selftests/xsk: fix too-many-frags multi-buffer Tx test Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-07-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 net 0/6] xsk: fix AF_XDP multi-buffer Tx descriptor reclaim Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260719135609.147823-7-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox