From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
magnus.karlsson@intel.com, stfomichev@gmail.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
bjorn@kernel.org, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net 0/6] xsk: fix AF_XDP multi-buffer Tx descriptor reclaim
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:30:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <al53I9K0ThMPXjSU@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719135609.147823-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
On 07/19, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> v3:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260714140722.111645-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com/T/
> v3->v4:
>
> * Return standalone invalid Tx descriptors through the completion ring in
> both the generic and zero-copy Tx paths. Advancing the Tx-ring consumer
> releases only the ring slot; returning the descriptor address through
> the CQ also transfers ownership of the corresponding UMEM frame back to
> userspace.
>
> * Remove xsk_tx_batch::consumed_descs. With standalone invalid descriptors
> now reclaimed through the CQ, every descriptor permanently removed from
> the Tx ring is represented by either tx_descs or reclaim_descs. Use
> their sum for Tx-consumer advancement, shared-UMEM fairness accounting,
> and progress detection.
>
> * Ensure that generic reclaim-only processing publishes the updated
> Tx-ring consumer even when no packet was submitted to the networking
> stack.
>
> * Update the XSK selftests to count every descriptor submitted to the Tx
> ring as an expected CQ entry, while continuing to count only valid
> packets as expected Rx traffic. This covers standalone invalid
> descriptors, invalid multi-buffer packets, oversized packets, and the
> non-verbatim STAT_TX_INVALID tests.
>
> * Update the AF_XDP documentation to describe the completion ring as an
> ownership-transfer mechanism and document that standalone, invalid
> multi-buffer, and oversized Tx packets are reclaimed through the CQ.
>
> * Add Jason's tags
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Kudos for updating the doc with the new expectations! (and I still hope
that we can separately redo the generic tx path)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-19 13:56 [PATCH v4 net 0/6] xsk: fix AF_XDP multi-buffer Tx descriptor reclaim Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 1/6] xsk: fix buffer leak in xsk_drop_skb() for AF_XDP multi-buffer Tx Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 2/6] xsk: drain continuation descs after overflow in xsk_build_skb() Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 3/6] xsk: provide sufficient space in pool->tx_descs Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 4/6] xsk: reclaim invalid Tx descriptors in ZC batch path Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 5/6] selftests/xsk: fix too-many-frags multi-buffer Tx test Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-19 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 net 6/6] selftests/xsk: account reclaimed invalid Tx descriptors Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-20 19:30 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=al53I9K0ThMPXjSU@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
--to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox