* [PATCH net v3] sctp: don't free the ASCONF's own transport in DEL-IP processing
@ 2026-07-21 13:14 Jun Yang
2026-07-23 14:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jun Yang @ 2026-07-21 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, Xin Long, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, linux-sctp,
linux-kernel, Jun Yang, stable
From: Jun Yang <junvyyang@tencent.com>
sctp_process_asconf() caches the transport the ASCONF chunk is processed
against in asconf->transport (== chunk->transport, set once in sctp_rcv()).
For an ASCONF located through its Address Parameter by
__sctp_rcv_asconf_lookup(), that cached transport corresponds to the
Address Parameter, which need not be the packet's source address.
sctp_process_asconf_param() rejects a DEL-IP for the packet source address
(ADDIP D8, SCTP_ERROR_DEL_SRC_IP), but nothing protects asconf->transport.
A single ASCONF can therefore carry, in order:
[Address Parameter L] [DEL-IP L] [DEL-IP 0.0.0.0]
where L differs from the source. The DEL-IP for L passes the D8 check and
calls sctp_assoc_rm_peer() on the transport that asconf->transport still
points at, freeing it (RCU-deferred). The following wildcard DEL-IP then
reuses the now-dangling asconf->transport in sctp_assoc_set_primary() and
sctp_assoc_del_nonprimary_peers(): set_primary() dereferences the freed
transport (->ipaddr, ->state) and plants the dangling pointer into
asoc->peer.primary_path / active_path, and del_nonprimary_peers(), keeping
only the pointer that is no longer on the list, removes every real
transport, leaving the association with a transport_count of 0 and
primary_path/active_path pointing at freed memory.
Reject a DEL-IP that targets the transport the ASCONF is being processed
against, mirroring the existing source-address guard, so the wildcard
branch can never reuse a freed transport.
Fixes: 42e30bf3463c ("[SCTP]: Handle the wildcard ADD-IP Address parameter")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jun Yang <junvyyang@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
---
v3: return Request Refused instead of Request to Delete Source IP Address,
as the protected transport need not be the packet's source address.
v2: add [net] subject prefix to target the net tree.
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
index 8adac9e0cd66..b14251214896 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
@@ -3153,6 +3153,12 @@ static __be16 sctp_process_asconf_param(struct sctp_association *asoc,
if (!peer)
return SCTP_ERROR_DNS_FAILED;
+ /* Don't free asconf->transport; a later wildcard DEL-IP
+ * parameter reuses it.
+ */
+ if (peer == asconf->transport)
+ return SCTP_ERROR_REQ_REFUSED;
+
sctp_assoc_rm_peer(asoc, peer);
break;
case SCTP_PARAM_SET_PRIMARY:
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] sctp: don't free the ASCONF's own transport in DEL-IP processing
2026-07-21 13:14 [PATCH net v3] sctp: don't free the ASCONF's own transport in DEL-IP processing Jun Yang
@ 2026-07-23 14:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-23 15:33 ` Xin Long
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2026-07-23 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jun Yang, Xin Long
Cc: netdev, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, linux-sctp, linux-kernel, Jun Yang,
stable
On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:14:05 +0800 Jun Yang wrote:
> Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Could you point me to where Xin Long acked this?
I don't see the ack in replies to v1 or v2.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] sctp: don't free the ASCONF's own transport in DEL-IP processing
2026-07-23 14:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2026-07-23 15:33 ` Xin Long
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Xin Long @ 2026-07-23 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Jun Yang, netdev, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner, David S . Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, linux-sctp, linux-kernel,
Jun Yang, stable
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 10:29 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:14:05 +0800 Jun Yang wrote:
> > Acked-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
>
> Could you point me to where Xin Long acked this?
> I don't see the ack in replies to v1 or v2.
Hi Jakub,
He initially sent the patch to security@kernel.org, and I asked him to
submit it to netdev with my Ack.
By the way, there's a question about whether patches for security fixes
should include the PoC in the patch/cover-letter when they're posted to
the netdev ML?
Thanks,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-23 15:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-21 13:14 [PATCH net v3] sctp: don't free the ASCONF's own transport in DEL-IP processing Jun Yang
2026-07-23 14:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-23 15:33 ` Xin Long
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox