Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/15][pull request] Introduce iXD driver

[Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 10:33:25AM +0200, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 06:15:26AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:24:15 +0200 Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> > > I have looked though Sashiko feedback for this version. A lot medium+ comments 
> > > were things that I have addressed as false-positives in v4, so those are left 
> > > out, same as many of low-severity subjective issues. Unfortunately, patch 4 does 
> > > need a fixup (see Re: for the patch itself), but hopefully this does not warrant 
> > > another PR.
> > 
> > There's gazillion patches in the queue. Just fix the bugs and repost.
> > This "we will follow up" attitude is getting out of hand IMHO.
> 
> I was suggesting you could apply the fixup that I have posted under patch 4 
> ("libie: add control queue support"). If this is not possible, then Tony will do 
> that and send another revision. (please respond)
> 
> Other feedback does not interfere with code working as intended, although 
> Sashiko's feedback was pretty valuable in getting to the point where I can say 
> that.
> 
> I see that Simon posted only medium+ feedback, I could address it one-by-one 
> once more, if anyone would read that.

I realise that in the case of this patchset I forwarded AI-generated review
which somewhat overlapped with your own efforts: somehow I missed your
emails and I apologise for that.

But I wanted to make a general statement regarding commenting on
AI-generated review:

I do try (and as we see, sometimes fail), to take into account prior
discussion on the mailing list as part of my review process.  And I would
like to think that I am not alone in taking this approach.  So to that
extent, I think that responses on the ML to concerns flagged by
AI-generated review have value.