* [PATCH net-next] pptp: validate payload length before parsing PPP fields
@ 2026-08-13 8:22 Zhixing Chen
2026-08-14 17:42 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zhixing Chen @ 2026-08-13 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni
Cc: netdev, Zhixing Chen
pptp_rcv_core() pulls the PPTP GRE header together with the payload length
advertised by the header, then looks into the PPP payload for two special
cases: allowing old-sequence LCP Echo packets and stripping the PPP
address/control fields.
Both checks read fixed PPP fields from the payload. Make sure the
advertised payload length covers those fields before reading them, so
malformed short payloads are rejected before their PPP contents are
evaluated.
This keeps the receive path within the declared PPTP payload boundary.
Signed-off-by: Zhixing Chen <running910@gmail.com>
---
While testing PPTP stability and reviewing the PPTP driver code, I noticed
that the receive path can reach the old-sequence LCP Echo check and the
address/control field handling with an advertised payload length shorter
than the PPP fields being inspected.
I exercised this path with malformed short PPTP GRE packets and confirmed
that such packets can reach both checks. The test packets did not trigger a
KASAN report in my setup, but my understanding is that the parser should
not inspect bytes outside the declared PPTP payload when deciding how to
handle PPP fields.
This is intended as a small robustness improvement for malformed PPTP GRE
packets.
---
drivers/net/ppp/pptp.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pptp.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pptp.c
index a797a0606f6b..708d8fb3a900 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/pptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/pptp.c
@@ -317,16 +317,18 @@ static int pptp_rcv_core(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
payload = skb->data + headersize;
/* check for expected sequence number */
if (seq < opt->seq_recv + 1 || WRAPPED(opt->seq_recv, seq)) {
- if ((payload[0] == PPP_ALLSTATIONS) && (payload[1] == PPP_UI) &&
- (PPP_PROTOCOL(payload) == PPP_LCP) &&
- ((payload[4] == PPP_LCP_ECHOREQ) || (payload[4] == PPP_LCP_ECHOREP)))
+ if (payload_len >= PPP_HDRLEN + 1 &&
+ payload[0] == PPP_ALLSTATIONS && payload[1] == PPP_UI &&
+ PPP_PROTOCOL(payload) == PPP_LCP &&
+ (payload[4] == PPP_LCP_ECHOREQ || payload[4] == PPP_LCP_ECHOREP))
goto allow_packet;
} else {
opt->seq_recv = seq;
allow_packet:
skb_pull(skb, headersize);
- if (payload[0] == PPP_ALLSTATIONS && payload[1] == PPP_UI) {
+ if (payload_len >= 2 &&
+ payload[0] == PPP_ALLSTATIONS && payload[1] == PPP_UI) {
/* chop off address/control */
if (skb->len < 3)
goto drop;
base-commit: f6057f06ef7afa9893ed33603f7917fa39d237b5
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next] pptp: validate payload length before parsing PPP fields
2026-08-13 8:22 [PATCH net-next] pptp: validate payload length before parsing PPP fields Zhixing Chen
@ 2026-08-14 17:42 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2026-08-14 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhixing Chen
Cc: Andrew Lunn, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, netdev
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 04:22:47PM +0800, Zhixing Chen wrote:
> pptp_rcv_core() pulls the PPTP GRE header together with the payload length
> advertised by the header, then looks into the PPP payload for two special
> cases: allowing old-sequence LCP Echo packets and stripping the PPP
> address/control fields.
>
> Both checks read fixed PPP fields from the payload. Make sure the
> advertised payload length covers those fields before reading them, so
> malformed short payloads are rejected before their PPP contents are
> evaluated.
>
> This keeps the receive path within the declared PPTP payload boundary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhixing Chen <running910@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> While testing PPTP stability and reviewing the PPTP driver code, I noticed
> that the receive path can reach the old-sequence LCP Echo check and the
> address/control field handling with an advertised payload length shorter
> than the PPP fields being inspected.
>
> I exercised this path with malformed short PPTP GRE packets and confirmed
> that such packets can reach both checks. The test packets did not trigger a
> KASAN report in my setup, but my understanding is that the parser should
> not inspect bytes outside the declared PPTP payload when deciding how to
> handle PPP fields.
>
> This is intended as a small robustness improvement for malformed PPTP GRE
> packets.
>
> ---
> drivers/net/ppp/pptp.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pptp.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pptp.c
> index a797a0606f6b..708d8fb3a900 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ppp/pptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ppp/pptp.c
> @@ -317,16 +317,18 @@ static int pptp_rcv_core(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> payload = skb->data + headersize;
> /* check for expected sequence number */
> if (seq < opt->seq_recv + 1 || WRAPPED(opt->seq_recv, seq)) {
> - if ((payload[0] == PPP_ALLSTATIONS) && (payload[1] == PPP_UI) &&
> - (PPP_PROTOCOL(payload) == PPP_LCP) &&
> - ((payload[4] == PPP_LCP_ECHOREQ) || (payload[4] == PPP_LCP_ECHOREP)))
> + if (payload_len >= PPP_HDRLEN + 1 &&
> + payload[0] == PPP_ALLSTATIONS && payload[1] == PPP_UI &&
> + PPP_PROTOCOL(payload) == PPP_LCP &&
> + (payload[4] == PPP_LCP_ECHOREQ || payload[4] == PPP_LCP_ECHOREP))
> goto allow_packet;
> } else {
> opt->seq_recv = seq;
> allow_packet:
> skb_pull(skb, headersize);
>
> - if (payload[0] == PPP_ALLSTATIONS && payload[1] == PPP_UI) {
> + if (payload_len >= 2 &&
> + payload[0] == PPP_ALLSTATIONS && payload[1] == PPP_UI) {
> /* chop off address/control */
> if (skb->len < 3)
> goto drop;
Hi,
There is an AI-generated review of your patch available at
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260813082247.31499-1-running910%40gmail.com
It suggests adding a Fixes tag, and implicitly targeting net.
I feel that is not correct as you are positioning this as a robustness
improvement.
However, the following portion of the review does stand out to me
and I'd value your feedback on it:
Both new guards bound the reads by the peer-advertised payload_len rather
than by the bytes actually present (skb->len - headersize), which is what
pskb_may_pull() guaranteed and what the pre-existing check just below
already uses. Is it intentional that one skb_pull(skb, 2) is now gated by
two different length authorities?
Since the skb is never trimmed to headersize + payload_len, payload_len is
only a lower bound, so a peer that under-reports it still passes
pskb_may_pull() and is still delivered. For an in-sequence frame whose
real PPP payload starts with 0xff 0x03 but whose header says
payload_len < 2, the address/control octets are no longer stripped, and
the frame continues down:
drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:__ppp_decompress_proto() {
if (ppp_skb_is_compressed_proto(skb))
*(u8 *)skb_push(skb, 1) = 0x00;
}
0xff has the low bit set, so a 0x00 is pushed and ppp_input() then sees:
proto = PPP_PROTO(skb);
if (!ppp || proto >= 0xc000 || proto == PPP_CCPFRAG) {
with proto == 0x00ff instead of the real protocol, so the frame never
reaches its intended handler. Similarly, out-of-sequence LCP Echo
keepalives from such a peer are now dropped by the PPP_HDRLEN + 1 guard
instead of allowed, which can tear a tunnel down. Would using
skb->len - headersize for both comparisons avoid this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-14 17:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-13 8:22 [PATCH net-next] pptp: validate payload length before parsing PPP fields Zhixing Chen
2026-08-14 17:42 ` Simon Horman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox