* [PATCH 6.12.y v2] ipv4: start using dst_dev_rcu()
@ 2026-08-21 9:54 Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-24 9:05 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric) @ 2026-08-21 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, Eric Dumazet, David S. Miller, David Ahern,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, Martin KaFai Lau,
Wei Wang
Cc: thomas.petazzoni, netdev, linux-kernel,
Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric), Miguel Gazquez
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
[ Upstream commit 6ad8de3cefdb6ffa6708b21c567df0dbf82c43a8 ]
Change icmpv4_xrlim_allow(), ip_defrag() to prevent possible UAF.
Change ipmr_prepare_xmit(), ipmr_queue_fwd_xmit(), ip_mr_output(),
ipv4_neigh_lookup() to use lockdep enabled dst_dev_rcu().
[ minor modifications to fix conflict , added rcu_read_lock and unlock
to ip_defrag function ]
Fixes: 4a6ce2b6f2ec ("net: introduce a new function dst_dev_put()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250828195823.3958522-9-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric) <miguel.gazquez@bootlin.com>
---
Signed-off-by: Miguel Gazquez <miguel.gazquez@bootlin.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Added rcu_read_lock and unlock to ip_defrag function
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260820-cve-2025-40074-v1-1-f045d5f74950@bootlin.com
---
net/ipv4/icmp.c | 6 +++---
net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 9 +++++++--
net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 4 ++--
net/ipv4/route.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
index c7af8b914e13..1fc967a60bb9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
@@ -320,17 +320,17 @@ static bool icmpv4_xrlim_allow(struct net *net, struct rtable *rt,
return true;
/* No rate limit on loopback */
- dev = dst_dev(dst);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ dev = dst_dev_rcu(dst);
if (dev && (dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK))
goto out;
- rcu_read_lock();
peer = inet_getpeer_v4(net->ipv4.peers, fl4->daddr,
l3mdev_master_ifindex_rcu(dev));
rc = inet_peer_xrlim_allow(peer,
READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_ratelimit));
- rcu_read_unlock();
out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
if (!rc)
__ICMP_INC_STATS(net, ICMP_MIB_RATELIMITHOST);
else
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index d3abc84a6c02..f8919b2543e1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -483,13 +483,16 @@ static int ip_frag_reasm(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb,
/* Process an incoming IP datagram fragment. */
int ip_defrag(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 user)
{
- struct net_device *dev = skb->dev ? : skb_dst_dev(skb);
- int vif = l3mdev_master_ifindex_rcu(dev);
+ struct net_device *dev;
struct ipq *qp;
+ int vif;
__IP_INC_STATS(net, IPSTATS_MIB_REASMREQDS);
/* Lookup (or create) queue header */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ dev = skb->dev ? : skb_dst_dev_rcu(skb);
+ vif = l3mdev_master_ifindex_rcu(dev);
qp = ip_find(net, ip_hdr(skb), user, vif);
if (qp) {
int ret;
@@ -499,9 +502,11 @@ int ip_defrag(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 user)
ret = ip_frag_queue(qp, skb);
spin_unlock(&qp->q.lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
ipq_put(qp);
return ret;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
__IP_INC_STATS(net, IPSTATS_MIB_REASMFAILS);
kfree_skb(skb);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
index de0d9cc7806a..ad0b922ebc73 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -1906,7 +1906,7 @@ static void ipmr_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
goto out_free;
}
- encap += LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev) + rt->dst.header_len;
+ encap += LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dst_dev_rcu(&rt->dst)) + rt->dst.header_len;
if (skb_cow(skb, encap)) {
ip_rt_put(rt);
@@ -1943,7 +1943,7 @@ static void ipmr_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
* result in receiving multiple packets.
*/
NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV4, NF_INET_FORWARD,
- net, NULL, skb, skb->dev, dev,
+ net, NULL, skb, skb->dev, dst_dev_rcu(&rt->dst),
ipmr_forward_finish);
return;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 4dce0de6ab89..0f31ae4da3d9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -413,11 +413,11 @@ static struct neighbour *ipv4_neigh_lookup(const struct dst_entry *dst,
const void *daddr)
{
const struct rtable *rt = container_of(dst, struct rtable, dst);
- struct net_device *dev = dst_dev(dst);
+ struct net_device *dev;
struct neighbour *n;
rcu_read_lock();
-
+ dev = dst_dev_rcu(dst);
if (likely(rt->rt_gw_family == AF_INET)) {
n = ip_neigh_gw4(dev, rt->rt_gw4);
} else if (rt->rt_gw_family == AF_INET6) {
---
base-commit: 7155f3c7a69b8480e785f2a4252d31df95daa8d1
change-id: 20260820-cve-2025-40074-b2b8c05342a1
Best regards,
--
Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric) <miguel.gazquez@bootlin.com>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12.y v2] ipv4: start using dst_dev_rcu()
2026-08-21 9:54 [PATCH 6.12.y v2] ipv4: start using dst_dev_rcu() Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric)
@ 2026-08-24 9:05 ` Greg KH
2026-08-25 11:49 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2026-08-24 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric)
Cc: stable, Eric Dumazet, David S. Miller, David Ahern,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, Martin KaFai Lau,
Wei Wang, thomas.petazzoni, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 11:54:04AM +0200, Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric) wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 6ad8de3cefdb6ffa6708b21c567df0dbf82c43a8 ]
>
> Change icmpv4_xrlim_allow(), ip_defrag() to prevent possible UAF.
>
> Change ipmr_prepare_xmit(), ipmr_queue_fwd_xmit(), ip_mr_output(),
> ipv4_neigh_lookup() to use lockdep enabled dst_dev_rcu().
>
> [ minor modifications to fix conflict , added rcu_read_lock and unlock
> to ip_defrag function ]
>
> Fixes: 4a6ce2b6f2ec ("net: introduce a new function dst_dev_put()")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250828195823.3958522-9-edumazet@google.com
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric) <miguel.gazquez@bootlin.com>
> ---
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Gazquez <miguel.gazquez@bootlin.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Added rcu_read_lock and unlock to ip_defrag function
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260820-cve-2025-40074-v1-1-f045d5f74950@bootlin.com
> ---
> net/ipv4/icmp.c | 6 +++---
> net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 9 +++++++--
> net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 4 ++--
> net/ipv4/route.c | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
> index c7af8b914e13..1fc967a60bb9 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
> @@ -320,17 +320,17 @@ static bool icmpv4_xrlim_allow(struct net *net, struct rtable *rt,
> return true;
>
> /* No rate limit on loopback */
> - dev = dst_dev(dst);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + dev = dst_dev_rcu(dst);
> if (dev && (dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK))
> goto out;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> peer = inet_getpeer_v4(net->ipv4.peers, fl4->daddr,
> l3mdev_master_ifindex_rcu(dev));
> rc = inet_peer_xrlim_allow(peer,
> READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_icmp_ratelimit));
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> out:
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> if (!rc)
> __ICMP_INC_STATS(net, ICMP_MIB_RATELIMITHOST);
> else
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> index d3abc84a6c02..f8919b2543e1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> @@ -483,13 +483,16 @@ static int ip_frag_reasm(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb,
> /* Process an incoming IP datagram fragment. */
> int ip_defrag(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 user)
> {
> - struct net_device *dev = skb->dev ? : skb_dst_dev(skb);
> - int vif = l3mdev_master_ifindex_rcu(dev);
> + struct net_device *dev;
> struct ipq *qp;
> + int vif;
>
> __IP_INC_STATS(net, IPSTATS_MIB_REASMREQDS);
>
> /* Lookup (or create) queue header */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + dev = skb->dev ? : skb_dst_dev_rcu(skb);
> + vif = l3mdev_master_ifindex_rcu(dev);
> qp = ip_find(net, ip_hdr(skb), user, vif);
> if (qp) {
> int ret;
> @@ -499,9 +502,11 @@ int ip_defrag(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 user)
> ret = ip_frag_queue(qp, skb);
>
> spin_unlock(&qp->q.lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> ipq_put(qp);
> return ret;
> }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> __IP_INC_STATS(net, IPSTATS_MIB_REASMFAILS);
> kfree_skb(skb);
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
> index de0d9cc7806a..ad0b922ebc73 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
> @@ -1906,7 +1906,7 @@ static void ipmr_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
> goto out_free;
> }
>
> - encap += LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev) + rt->dst.header_len;
> + encap += LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dst_dev_rcu(&rt->dst)) + rt->dst.header_len;
>
> if (skb_cow(skb, encap)) {
> ip_rt_put(rt);
> @@ -1943,7 +1943,7 @@ static void ipmr_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
> * result in receiving multiple packets.
> */
> NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_IPV4, NF_INET_FORWARD,
> - net, NULL, skb, skb->dev, dev,
> + net, NULL, skb, skb->dev, dst_dev_rcu(&rt->dst),
> ipmr_forward_finish);
> return;
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> index 4dce0de6ab89..0f31ae4da3d9 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -413,11 +413,11 @@ static struct neighbour *ipv4_neigh_lookup(const struct dst_entry *dst,
> const void *daddr)
> {
> const struct rtable *rt = container_of(dst, struct rtable, dst);
> - struct net_device *dev = dst_dev(dst);
> + struct net_device *dev;
> struct neighbour *n;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> -
> + dev = dst_dev_rcu(dst);
> if (likely(rt->rt_gw_family == AF_INET)) {
> n = ip_neigh_gw4(dev, rt->rt_gw4);
> } else if (rt->rt_gw_family == AF_INET6) {
>
> ---
> base-commit: 7155f3c7a69b8480e785f2a4252d31df95daa8d1
> change-id: 20260820-cve-2025-40074-b2b8c05342a1
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric) <miguel.gazquez@bootlin.com>
>
>
Doesn't apply to the queue anymore due to me taking this patch series
from Sasha:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260821144926.3428433-1-sashal@kernel.org
Can you rebase it on that?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.12.y v2] ipv4: start using dst_dev_rcu()
2026-08-24 9:05 ` Greg KH
@ 2026-08-25 11:49 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-08-25 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric)
Cc: Sasha Levin, stable, Eric Dumazet, David S. Miller, David Ahern,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, Martin KaFai Lau,
Wei Wang, thomas.petazzoni, netdev, linux-kernel, Greg KH
On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 11:05:52AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> Doesn't apply to the queue anymore due to me taking this patch series
> from Sasha:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260821144926.3428433-1-sashal@kernel.org
>
> Can you rebase it on that?
Miguel, no need to respin - I've already redone the backport on top of
that series. Queued for 6.12, thanks.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-25 11:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-21 9:54 [PATCH 6.12.y v2] ipv4: start using dst_dev_rcu() Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric)
2026-08-24 9:05 ` Greg KH
2026-08-25 11:49 ` Sasha Levin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox