* [PATCH net v2] net: bridge: mcast: don't truncate the port group walk on teardown
@ 2026-08-26 1:41 Jun Yang
2026-08-26 7:48 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-08-27 19:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jun Yang @ 2026-08-26 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov, Ido Schimmel, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Simon Horman, stable, TencentOS Corvus AI, bridge, netdev,
Jun Yang
From: Jun Yang <junvyyang@tencent.com>
__br_multicast_disable_port_ctx() and br_multicast_del_port() walk
port->mglist with hlist_for_each_entry_safe(). However,
br_multicast_find_del_pg() can also delete other entries from the same
list through br_multicast_fwd_src_remove() or __fwd_del_star_excl().
If such an entry is the iterator's saved next node, hlist_del_init()
clears its ->next and terminates the walk early. The reproducer triggers
this in both teardown walks, leaving port groups in the bridge mdb with
a dangling ->key.port after del_nbp() frees the port:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mdb_fill_info+0x1191/0x1320
__mdb_fill_info+0x1191/0x1320
br_mdb_dump+0x594/0xe40
rtnl_mdb_dump+0x1cf/0x5d0
Use hlist_del_init_rcu() to unlink the group while preserving ->next.
br_multicast_del_pg() and the teardown walks run under
br->multicast_lock. The GC worker must acquire the same lock before
detaching the group for destruction, so the node remains alive while
the walk uses the preserved pointer.
Fixes: b08123684bd5 ("net: bridge: mcast: install S,G entries automatically based on reports")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Reported-by: TencentOS Corvus AI <corvus@tencent.com>
Assisted-by: tencentos-corvus-ai:kimi-k3
Signed-off-by: Jun Yang <junvyyang@tencent.com>
---
v2: delete with hlist_del_init_rcu() to preserve ->next for an in-progress
teardown walk, per Nikolay's suggestion, instead of restarting the walks.
Tested on 7.2-rc7 with KASAN: the original use-after-free is no longer
reported.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260812113435.1854275-1-junvyyang@tencent.com/
net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
index 00aa9b2879d6..8022c7f12169 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
@@ -808,7 +808,11 @@ void br_multicast_del_pg(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp,
struct hlist_node *tmp;
rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, pg->next);
- hlist_del_init(&pg->mglist);
+ /* Keep ->next (held under multicast_lock, freed later by the GC work):
+ * a port->mglist teardown walk may have latched this node as its next,
+ * and deleting other groups of the same port must not truncate it.
+ */
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&pg->mglist);
br_multicast_eht_clean_sets(pg);
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ent, tmp, &pg->src_list, node)
br_multicast_del_group_src(ent, false);
--
2.43.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v2] net: bridge: mcast: don't truncate the port group walk on teardown
2026-08-26 1:41 [PATCH net v2] net: bridge: mcast: don't truncate the port group walk on teardown Jun Yang
@ 2026-08-26 7:48 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-08-27 19:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2026-08-26 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jun Yang, Ido Schimmel, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Simon Horman, stable, TencentOS Corvus AI, bridge, netdev,
Jun Yang
On 26/08/2026 04:41, Jun Yang wrote:
> From: Jun Yang <junvyyang@tencent.com>
>
> __br_multicast_disable_port_ctx() and br_multicast_del_port() walk
> port->mglist with hlist_for_each_entry_safe(). However,
> br_multicast_find_del_pg() can also delete other entries from the same
> list through br_multicast_fwd_src_remove() or __fwd_del_star_excl().
>
> If such an entry is the iterator's saved next node, hlist_del_init()
> clears its ->next and terminates the walk early. The reproducer triggers
> this in both teardown walks, leaving port groups in the bridge mdb with
> a dangling ->key.port after del_nbp() frees the port:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mdb_fill_info+0x1191/0x1320
> __mdb_fill_info+0x1191/0x1320
> br_mdb_dump+0x594/0xe40
> rtnl_mdb_dump+0x1cf/0x5d0
>
> Use hlist_del_init_rcu() to unlink the group while preserving ->next.
> br_multicast_del_pg() and the teardown walks run under
> br->multicast_lock. The GC worker must acquire the same lock before
> detaching the group for destruction, so the node remains alive while
> the walk uses the preserved pointer.
>
> Fixes: b08123684bd5 ("net: bridge: mcast: install S,G entries automatically based on reports")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
> Reported-by: TencentOS Corvus AI <corvus@tencent.com>
> Assisted-by: tencentos-corvus-ai:kimi-k3
> Signed-off-by: Jun Yang <junvyyang@tencent.com>
> ---
> v2: delete with hlist_del_init_rcu() to preserve ->next for an in-progress
> teardown walk, per Nikolay's suggestion, instead of restarting the walks.
> Tested on 7.2-rc7 with KASAN: the original use-after-free is no longer
> reported.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260812113435.1854275-1-junvyyang@tencent.com/
>
> net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> index 00aa9b2879d6..8022c7f12169 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> @@ -808,7 +808,11 @@ void br_multicast_del_pg(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp,
> struct hlist_node *tmp;
>
> rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, pg->next);
> - hlist_del_init(&pg->mglist);
> + /* Keep ->next (held under multicast_lock, freed later by the GC work):
> + * a port->mglist teardown walk may have latched this node as its next,
> + * and deleting other groups of the same port must not truncate it.
> + */
> + hlist_del_init_rcu(&pg->mglist);
> br_multicast_eht_clean_sets(pg);
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ent, tmp, &pg->src_list, node)
> br_multicast_del_group_src(ent, false);
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v2] net: bridge: mcast: don't truncate the port group walk on teardown
2026-08-26 1:41 [PATCH net v2] net: bridge: mcast: don't truncate the port group walk on teardown Jun Yang
2026-08-26 7:48 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2026-08-27 19:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-28 9:04 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2026-08-27 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: littleddfu
Cc: Jakub Kicinski, razor, idosch, davem, edumazet, pabeni, horms,
stable, corvus, bridge, netdev, junvyyang
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net: bridge: mcast: don't truncate the port group walk on teardown
This changes br_multicast_del_pg() to unlink the port group from
port->mglist with hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_init(), so
that a nested deletion of another group of the same port does not clear
the ->next pointer that an in-progress teardown walk has already latched.
The intent is to stop br_multicast_del_port() and
__br_multicast_disable_port_ctx() from terminating early and leaving port
groups behind with a dangling ->key.port.
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> index 75e1e2a8fc83a..452ac68c4a835 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
> @@ -808,7 +808,11 @@ void br_multicast_del_pg(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp,
> struct hlist_node *tmp;
>
> rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, pg->next);
> - hlist_del_init(&pg->mglist);
> + /* Keep ->next (held under multicast_lock, freed later by the GC work):
> + * a port->mglist teardown walk may have latched this node as its next,
> + * and deleting other groups of the same port must not truncate it.
> + */
> + hlist_del_init_rcu(&pg->mglist);
[Severity: High]
Preserving ->next keeps the walk going, but doesn't it now make the walk
visit a group that was already deleted as a side effect?
hlist_del_init_rcu() only clears ->pprev, so the latched next node is
still reachable by the iterator:
include/linux/rculist.h:
static inline void hlist_del_init_rcu(struct hlist_node *n)
{
if (!hlist_unhashed(n)) {
__hlist_del(n);
WRITE_ONCE(n->pprev, NULL);
}
}
Taking br_multicast_del_port() as the example, all under
br->multicast_lock:
br_multicast_del_port()
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(pg, n, &port->mglist, mglist) /* n = A->next = B */
br_multicast_find_del_pg(br, A)
br_multicast_del_pg(mp, A, pp)
br_multicast_del_group_src() -> br_multicast_fwd_src_remove()
or br_multicast_star_g_handle_mode() -> __fwd_del_star_excl()
or br_multicast_sg_del_exclude_ports()
-> deletes B (same port) via br_multicast_del_pg()
rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, B->next); /* B off mp->ports */
hlist_del_init_rcu(&B->mglist); /* B->next preserved */
pg = n = B /* loop continues into B */
br_multicast_find_del_pg(br, B)
In br_multicast_find_del_pg() the mdb entry lookup still succeeds, since
mdb entries are only unhashed under br->multicast_lock, but the scan over
mp->ports can no longer find B because br_multicast_del_pg() already did
rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, pg->next) for it:
for (pp = &mp->ports;
(p = mlock_dereference(*pp, br)) != NULL;
pp = &p->next) {
if (p != pg)
continue;
br_multicast_del_pg(mp, pg, pp);
return;
}
WARN_ON(1);
So control falls through to the trailing WARN_ON(1). br_multicast_del_port()
applies no filter at all before calling br_multicast_find_del_pg(), and the
filter in __br_multicast_disable_port_ctx():
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(pg, n, &pmctx->port->mglist, mglist)
if (!(pg->flags & MDB_PG_FLAGS_PERMANENT) &&
(!br_multicast_port_ctx_is_vlan(pmctx) ||
pg->key.addr.vid == pmctx->vlan->vid))
br_multicast_find_del_pg(pmctx->port->br, pg);
doesn't exclude a kernel-installed, non-permanent S,G group either.
Does that mean the reproducer described in the commit message now produces
a WARN backtrace on the same path instead of the KASAN use-after-free, and
a panic when booted with panic_on_warn=1?
Would it make sense to also skip nodes that are already unlinked in both
teardown walks, e.g.:
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(pg, n, &port->mglist, mglist) {
if (hlist_unhashed(&pg->mglist))
continue;
br_multicast_find_del_pg(br, pg);
}
or otherwise restart the walk, rather than relying on the preserved ->next
alone?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but the same list has a second
deletion site that still uses the non-RCU helper and frees immediately,
br_multicast_del_port_group():
void br_multicast_del_port_group(struct net_bridge_port_group *p)
{
struct net_bridge_port *port = p->key.port;
__u16 vid = p->key.addr.vid;
hlist_del_init(&p->mglist);
if (!br_multicast_is_star_g(&p->key.addr))
rhashtable_remove_fast(&port->br->sg_port_tbl, &p->rhnode,
br_sg_port_rht_params);
kfree(p);
br_multicast_port_ngroups_dec(port, vid);
}
port->mglist is also walked locklessly by br_multicast_list_adjacent(),
which only holds rcu_read_lock():
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(group, &port->mglist, mglist) {
...
entry->addr = group->key.addr;
That reader is exported and used from net/batman-adv/multicast.c. The group
is already published on port->mglist by br_multicast_new_port_group()
(hlist_add_head(&p->mglist, &port->mglist)) before the only caller of
br_multicast_del_port_group() runs, the err_del_port_group label in
br_mdb_add_group_star_g() in net/bridge/br_mdb.c, reached when
br_mdb_add_group_srcs() fails. br_mdb_config_src_list_init() does not
reject a duplicated source, so a MDBE_ATTR_SRC_LIST carrying the same
source twice without NLM_F_REPLACE makes br_mdb_add_group_src() return
-EEXIST; an allocation failure returning -ENOSPC is a second trigger.
spin_lock_bh(&br->multicast_lock) held by the deleting side does not
exclude an RCU reader on another CPU. Can br_multicast_list_adjacent()
then read group->key.addr and follow group->mglist.next after the plain
kfree(p), and does the hlist_del_init() there also truncate that RCU walk
by NULLing ->next?
Since this patch establishes that port->mglist deletions must preserve
->next and defer the free, would it be worth converting this site to
hlist_del_init_rcu() plus a deferred free, in the way
br_multicast_destroy_port_group() uses kfree_rcu()?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v2] net: bridge: mcast: don't truncate the port group walk on teardown
2026-08-27 19:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2026-08-28 9:04 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2026-08-28 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski, littleddfu
Cc: idosch, davem, edumazet, pabeni, horms, stable, corvus, bridge,
netdev, junvyyang
On 27/08/2026 22:31, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> ---
> net: bridge: mcast: don't truncate the port group walk on teardown
>
> This changes br_multicast_del_pg() to unlink the port group from
> port->mglist with hlist_del_init_rcu() instead of hlist_del_init(), so
> that a nested deletion of another group of the same port does not clear
> the ->next pointer that an in-progress teardown walk has already latched.
> The intent is to stop br_multicast_del_port() and
> __br_multicast_disable_port_ctx() from terminating early and leaving port
> groups behind with a dangling ->key.port.
>
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>> index 75e1e2a8fc83a..452ac68c4a835 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c
>> @@ -808,7 +808,11 @@ void br_multicast_del_pg(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp,
>> struct hlist_node *tmp;
>>
>> rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, pg->next);
>> - hlist_del_init(&pg->mglist);
>> + /* Keep ->next (held under multicast_lock, freed later by the GC work):
>> + * a port->mglist teardown walk may have latched this node as its next,
>> + * and deleting other groups of the same port must not truncate it.
>> + */
>> + hlist_del_init_rcu(&pg->mglist);
>
> [Severity: High]
>
> Preserving ->next keeps the walk going, but doesn't it now make the walk
> visit a group that was already deleted as a side effect?
>
> hlist_del_init_rcu() only clears ->pprev, so the latched next node is
> still reachable by the iterator:
>
> include/linux/rculist.h:
> static inline void hlist_del_init_rcu(struct hlist_node *n)
> {
> if (!hlist_unhashed(n)) {
> __hlist_del(n);
> WRITE_ONCE(n->pprev, NULL);
> }
> }
>
> Taking br_multicast_del_port() as the example, all under
> br->multicast_lock:
>
> br_multicast_del_port()
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe(pg, n, &port->mglist, mglist) /* n = A->next = B */
> br_multicast_find_del_pg(br, A)
> br_multicast_del_pg(mp, A, pp)
> br_multicast_del_group_src() -> br_multicast_fwd_src_remove()
> or br_multicast_star_g_handle_mode() -> __fwd_del_star_excl()
> or br_multicast_sg_del_exclude_ports()
> -> deletes B (same port) via br_multicast_del_pg()
> rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, B->next); /* B off mp->ports */
> hlist_del_init_rcu(&B->mglist); /* B->next preserved */
> pg = n = B /* loop continues into B */
> br_multicast_find_del_pg(br, B)
>
> In br_multicast_find_del_pg() the mdb entry lookup still succeeds, since
> mdb entries are only unhashed under br->multicast_lock, but the scan over
> mp->ports can no longer find B because br_multicast_del_pg() already did
> rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, pg->next) for it:
>
> for (pp = &mp->ports;
> (p = mlock_dereference(*pp, br)) != NULL;
> pp = &p->next) {
> if (p != pg)
> continue;
>
> br_multicast_del_pg(mp, pg, pp);
> return;
> }
>
> WARN_ON(1);
>
> So control falls through to the trailing WARN_ON(1). br_multicast_del_port()
> applies no filter at all before calling br_multicast_find_del_pg(), and the
> filter in __br_multicast_disable_port_ctx():
>
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe(pg, n, &pmctx->port->mglist, mglist)
> if (!(pg->flags & MDB_PG_FLAGS_PERMANENT) &&
> (!br_multicast_port_ctx_is_vlan(pmctx) ||
> pg->key.addr.vid == pmctx->vlan->vid))
> br_multicast_find_del_pg(pmctx->port->br, pg);
>
> doesn't exclude a kernel-installed, non-permanent S,G group either.
>
> Does that mean the reproducer described in the commit message now produces
> a WARN backtrace on the same path instead of the KASAN use-after-free, and
> a panic when booted with panic_on_warn=1?
>
> Would it make sense to also skip nodes that are already unlinked in both
> teardown walks, e.g.:
>
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe(pg, n, &port->mglist, mglist) {
> if (hlist_unhashed(&pg->mglist))
> continue;
> br_multicast_find_del_pg(br, pg);
> }
>
> or otherwise restart the walk, rather than relying on the preserved ->next
> alone?
>
Oh, right, I missed that WARN_ON() and it will fire, yes. But instead of
sprinkling these hlist_unhashed checks around, you can add 1 to the beginning
of br_multicast_find_del_pg() with a comment why it exists
> [Severity: High]
>
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but the same list has a second
> deletion site that still uses the non-RCU helper and frees immediately,
> br_multicast_del_port_group():
>
> void br_multicast_del_port_group(struct net_bridge_port_group *p)
> {
> struct net_bridge_port *port = p->key.port;
> __u16 vid = p->key.addr.vid;
>
> hlist_del_init(&p->mglist);
> if (!br_multicast_is_star_g(&p->key.addr))
> rhashtable_remove_fast(&port->br->sg_port_tbl, &p->rhnode,
> br_sg_port_rht_params);
> kfree(p);
> br_multicast_port_ngroups_dec(port, vid);
> }
>
> port->mglist is also walked locklessly by br_multicast_list_adjacent(),
> which only holds rcu_read_lock():
>
> hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(group, &port->mglist, mglist) {
> ...
> entry->addr = group->key.addr;
>
> That reader is exported and used from net/batman-adv/multicast.c. The group
> is already published on port->mglist by br_multicast_new_port_group()
> (hlist_add_head(&p->mglist, &port->mglist)) before the only caller of
> br_multicast_del_port_group() runs, the err_del_port_group label in
> br_mdb_add_group_star_g() in net/bridge/br_mdb.c, reached when
> br_mdb_add_group_srcs() fails. br_mdb_config_src_list_init() does not
> reject a duplicated source, so a MDBE_ATTR_SRC_LIST carrying the same
> source twice without NLM_F_REPLACE makes br_mdb_add_group_src() return
> -EEXIST; an allocation failure returning -ENOSPC is a second trigger.
>
> spin_lock_bh(&br->multicast_lock) held by the deleting side does not
> exclude an RCU reader on another CPU. Can br_multicast_list_adjacent()
> then read group->key.addr and follow group->mglist.next after the plain
> kfree(p), and does the hlist_del_init() there also truncate that RCU walk
> by NULLing ->next?
>
> Since this patch establishes that port->mglist deletions must preserve
> ->next and defer the free, would it be worth converting this site to
> hlist_del_init_rcu() plus a deferred free, in the way
> br_multicast_destroy_port_group() uses kfree_rcu()?
Ouch, that is actually a separate and valid bug, the cleanup shouldn't be
using hlist_del_init + immediate kfree(). I will take care of this one.
Cheers,
Nik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-28 9:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-26 1:41 [PATCH net v2] net: bridge: mcast: don't truncate the port group walk on teardown Jun Yang
2026-08-26 7:48 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2026-08-27 19:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-28 9:04 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox