Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn,
	magnus.karlsson@intel.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com,
	przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, jbrandeb@kernel.org,
	horms@kernel.org, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	sdf@fomichev.me, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
	Sunitha Mekala <sunithax.d.mekala@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 3/8] i40e: make ring pointers unreachable before freeing via rcu
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 14:24:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918212458.550425-4-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918212458.550425-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>

From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>

Sashiko reports:
***
>  err_config:
> +	i40e_vsi_free_q_vectors(vsi);
> +err_qvec:
>  	i40e_vsi_clear_rings(vsi);
This is a pre-existing issue, but can the sequence in i40e_vsi_clear_rings()
lead to an RCU ordering violation?
In i40e_vsi_clear_rings(), the rings are freed before the array pointers are
nullified:
	kfree_rcu(vsi->tx_rings[i], rcu);
	WRITE_ONCE(vsi->tx_rings[i], NULL);
Under RCU rules, a pointer must be made unreachable to new readers before it
is handed off to kfree_rcu(). Could a new RCU reader (like
i40e_get_netdev_stats_struct_tx()) fetch the pointer after kfree_rcu() is
invoked, and access freed memory if the grace period expires while the
reader is still active?
***

Save the Tx ring pointer before clearing the published ring array slots
and pass the saved pointer to kfree_rcu(). This preserves the intended
RCU ordering, where new readers can no longer discover the ring through
vsi->tx_rings/rx_rings/xdp_rings before the object is queued for
deferred freeing, while avoiding a NULL kfree_rcu() argument after the
slot has already been cleared. Since the Tx pointer is the base of the
per-queue-pair allocation block, re-reading vsi->tx_rings[i] after
WRITE_ONCE(..., NULL) would otherwise turn the free into a no-op and
leak the whole ring block.

Fixes: 9f65e15b4f98 ("i40e: Move rings from pointer to array to array of pointers")
Reported-by: Sashiko AI Review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Tested-by: Sunitha Mekala <sunithax.d.mekala@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
index de4c0737f72e..65aa50330aac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
@@ -11693,11 +11693,13 @@ static void i40e_vsi_clear_rings(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
 
 	if (vsi->tx_rings && vsi->tx_rings[0]) {
 		for (i = 0; i < vsi->alloc_queue_pairs; i++) {
-			kfree_rcu(vsi->tx_rings[i], rcu);
+			struct i40e_ring *tx_ring = vsi->tx_rings[i];
+
 			WRITE_ONCE(vsi->tx_rings[i], NULL);
 			WRITE_ONCE(vsi->rx_rings[i], NULL);
 			if (vsi->xdp_rings)
 				WRITE_ONCE(vsi->xdp_rings[i], NULL);
+			kfree_rcu(tx_ring, rcu);
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
2.47.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18 21:24 [PATCH net 0/8][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2026-09-18 (i40e) Tony Nguyen
2026-09-18 21:24 ` [PATCH net 1/8] i40e: unregister netdev before clearing VSI on reinit failure Tony Nguyen
2026-09-22  1:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-25 13:19     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-09-18 21:24 ` [PATCH net 2/8] i40e: avoid null ptr dereference in i40e_ptp_stop() Tony Nguyen
2026-09-22  1:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-25 13:30     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-09-18 21:24 ` Tony Nguyen [this message]
2026-09-22  1:31   ` [PATCH net 3/8] i40e: make ring pointers unreachable before freeing via rcu netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-25 15:16     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-09-18 21:24 ` [PATCH net 4/8] i40e: avoid deadlock when calling unregister_netdev() Tony Nguyen
2026-09-22  1:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-25 16:59     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-09-18 21:24 ` [PATCH net 5/8] i40e: fix potential UAF in i40e_vsi_setup()'s error path Tony Nguyen
2026-09-18 21:24 ` [PATCH net 6/8] i40e: do not expose netdev too early Tony Nguyen
2026-09-22  1:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-18 21:24 ` [PATCH net 7/8] i40e: keep q_vectors array in sync with channel count changes Tony Nguyen
2026-09-22  1:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-18 21:24 ` [PATCH net 8/8] i40e: xsk: fix multi-buffer XDP_PASS skb construction Tony Nguyen
2026-09-24 11:23 ` [PATCH net 0/8][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2026-09-18 (i40e) Paolo Abeni
2026-09-24 11:25   ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-25 12:46     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-09-25 20:00       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-26 12:21         ` Maciej Fijalkowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260918212458.550425-4-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --to=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jbrandeb@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=sunithax.d.mekala@intel.com \
    --cc=zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox