Re: [PATCH net v2 0/9] bnxt_en: Bug fixes

[Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>]

On Mon, 28 Sep 2026 04:25:08 +0000 netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote:
> This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
> commit messages seem to be missing some information:
> 
>  - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
>    development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
>    analysis tool scan.
> 
>  - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
>    (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
>    the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
> 
>  - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please
>    mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for
>    testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware.
> 
> Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
> reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
> can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
> other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
> then.
> 
> The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
> that is the case please reply and explain.

Michael, please respond to this and the AI review feedback.
We need to sort fixes more aggressively now, basically we need
to how if any of the issues fixed here are LLM-induced and
expected to be irrelevant.