Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,  Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,  Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	 Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net/tls: Receive-path fixes for zero-length data records
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 18:41:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001-tls-follow-on-v2-0-2dd1947bb642@kernel.org> (raw)

Commit 3be28e2c9cd0 ("net/tls: Consume empty data records in
tls_sw_read_sock()") fixed one reader. TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 both
permit a zero-length application_data record as a traffic-analysis
countermeasure (RFC 5246, Section 6.2.1; RFC 8446, Section 5.1), so
a peer that pads its stream emits them by design. The other two
software readers still mishandle them. splice(2) reports an empty
record as EOF, and the caller tears down a connection that is still
live. recvmsg(2) makes no progress on one, so a peer that streams
them holds the caller in the kernel past SIGKILL. With MSG_PEEK or
async decryption, each record is also queued on rx_list, which
grows without bound.

This series supersedes "[PATCH net] tls: skip empty data records in
tls_sw_splice_read()", which fixes the splice case alone:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260930052636.166007-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev/

Which fix a reader gets depends on its caller. splice(2) and
recvmsg(2) are system calls, so consuming the record and testing
signal_pending() is enough. A signal ends the call. Only
tls_sw_read_sock() needs a bound of its own. Its callers hold the
socket lock across the whole call and cannot act on a signal, so
nothing else can stop the loop. A count of consecutive records that
deliver no bytes supplies the bound (patch 1). The count is scoped
to read_sock deliberately. A flood on the other two paths costs the
caller CPU time and nothing else.

The series changes user-visible behavior. splice(2) on a
nonblocking socket, and sendfile(2) from one, now return -EAGAIN
where they used to block, as they do on a plain TCP socket. A
splice that reaches a control record behind an empty one now
returns -EINVAL rather than the zero that was the false EOF. A
nonblocking recvmsg(2) or splice(2) that has copied nothing and
finds a signal pending after an empty record returns -EINTR.

SO_RCVTIMEO does not bound these calls. It is applied at the
reader lock and again on each call to tls_rx_rec_wait(), so a call
that keeps retrying can wait past it. recvmsg(2) behaves this way
today. The retry added to splice(2) extends the same behavior to
that path.

Tested on x86_64. The tls selftest suite passes, 935 tests with
no skips.

---
Changes in v2:
- Bound no-data records by count, not elapsed time (Jakub).
- Drop the tls_rx_empty_data_rec() helper (Sabrina).
- Keep the strparser anchor out of tls_sw.c comments (Sabrina).
- Split the recvmsg signal test into its own patch.
- Drop tls_rx_intr_errno(); a nonblocking reader now gets -EINTR.
- Say why do_splice() misses the socket's O_NONBLOCK (Sabrina).
- Point the recvmsg patch's Fixes: at the commit that added rx_list.
- Reuse the new zero_len helpers in the existing fixture (Sabrina).
- Check errno unconditionally in the zero_len tests (Sabrina).
- Split the splice crypto-error fix and its test out (Jakub):
  https://patch.msgid.link/20260806-tls-splice-crypto-fix-v1-0-a2624005a286@kernel.org
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260726-tls-follow-on-v1-0-99bf4cc1c729@kernel.org

---
Chuck Lever (8):
      tls: bound consecutive no-data records in tls_sw_read_sock()
      tls: check for a pending signal after an empty record
      tls: consume empty data records in tls_sw_splice_read()
      tls: honor O_NONBLOCK in tls_sw_splice_read()
      tls: consume empty data records in tls_sw_recvmsg()
      selftests: tls: add peek and splice coverage for zero-length records
      selftests: tls: skip the zero_len tests when TLS is unavailable
      selftests: tls: cover splice on a nonblocking socket

 net/tls/tls_sw.c                  |  78 ++++++++++--
 tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 255 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: f49defea7668d8c68ec19fa085ef3da6075561c7
change-id: 20260726-tls-follow-on-486f1ba8bbb0

Best regards,
--  
Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-01 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01 22:41 Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] tls: bound consecutive no-data records in tls_sw_read_sock() Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:44     ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] tls: check for a pending signal after an empty record Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:45     ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/8] tls: consume empty data records in tls_sw_splice_read() Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:45     ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/8] tls: honor O_NONBLOCK " Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:46     ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/8] tls: consume empty data records in tls_sw_recvmsg() Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:47     ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] selftests: tls: add peek and splice coverage for zero-length records Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/8] selftests: tls: skip the zero_len tests when TLS is unavailable Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] selftests: tls: cover splice on a nonblocking socket Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net/tls: Receive-path fixes for zero-length data records netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-02 15:30   ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-04  6:36 ` Qingfang Deng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261001-tls-follow-on-v2-0-2dd1947bb642@kernel.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox