From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] tls: check for a pending signal after an empty record
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 18:41:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001-tls-follow-on-v2-2-2dd1947bb642@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-tls-follow-on-v2-0-2dd1947bb642@kernel.org>
tls_rx_rec_wait() tests signal_pending() only after it sleeps, and
it skips the wait loop when a record is already parsed.
tls_sw_recvmsg() calls it once per record, and a zero-length
application_data record advances neither of its loop bounds. A
peer that streams such records holds the caller in recvmsg(),
unresponsive to SIGKILL, for as long as they arrive.
Test for a pending signal in tls_sw_recvmsg() before it fetches the
record after an empty one. A reader that has copied data returns
it, and a nonblocking reader gets -EINTR. The test stays out of
tls_rx_rec_wait() because tls_sw_read_sock() also calls it, from
callers that cannot act on a signal.
Fixes: c46234ebb4d1 ("tls: RX path for ktls")
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index c78471c53f2f..ee50b9028264 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1824,6 +1824,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
bool is_peek = flags & MSG_PEEK;
bool rx_more = false;
bool released = true;
+ bool nodata = false;
bool zc_capable;
if (unlikely(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE))
@@ -1858,6 +1859,16 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
struct tls_decrypt_arg darg;
int to_decrypt, chunk;
+ /* A run of empty records advances neither loop bound, and
+ * tls_rx_rec_wait() tests for a signal only after it sleeps.
+ */
+ if (nodata && signal_pending(current)) {
+ long timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
+
+ err = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
+ goto recv_end;
+ }
+
err = tls_rx_rec_wait(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
released, !!(decrypted + copied));
if (err <= 0)
@@ -1910,6 +1921,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
/* TLS 1.3 may have updated the length by more than overhead */
rxm = strp_msg(darg.skb);
chunk = rxm->full_len;
+ nodata = !chunk;
tls_rx_rec_done(ctx);
if (!darg.zc) {
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 22:41 [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net/tls: Receive-path fixes for zero-length data records Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] tls: bound consecutive no-data records in tls_sw_read_sock() Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:44 ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-10-05 23:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] tls: check for a pending signal after an empty record netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:45 ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/8] tls: consume empty data records in tls_sw_splice_read() Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:45 ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/8] tls: honor O_NONBLOCK " Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:46 ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/8] tls: consume empty data records in tls_sw_recvmsg() Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:47 ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] selftests: tls: add peek and splice coverage for zero-length records Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/8] selftests: tls: skip the zero_len tests when TLS is unavailable Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] selftests: tls: cover splice on a nonblocking socket Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net/tls: Receive-path fixes for zero-length data records netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-02 15:30 ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-04 6:36 ` Qingfang Deng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001-tls-follow-on-v2-2-2dd1947bb642@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox