Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,  Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,  Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	 Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] tls: check for a pending signal after an empty record
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 18:41:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001-tls-follow-on-v2-2-2dd1947bb642@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-tls-follow-on-v2-0-2dd1947bb642@kernel.org>

tls_rx_rec_wait() tests signal_pending() only after it sleeps, and
it skips the wait loop when a record is already parsed.
tls_sw_recvmsg() calls it once per record, and a zero-length
application_data record advances neither of its loop bounds. A
peer that streams such records holds the caller in recvmsg(),
unresponsive to SIGKILL, for as long as they arrive.

Test for a pending signal in tls_sw_recvmsg() before it fetches the
record after an empty one. A reader that has copied data returns
it, and a nonblocking reader gets -EINTR. The test stays out of
tls_rx_rec_wait() because tls_sw_read_sock() also calls it, from
callers that cannot act on a signal.

Fixes: c46234ebb4d1 ("tls: RX path for ktls")
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index c78471c53f2f..ee50b9028264 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1824,6 +1824,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 	bool is_peek = flags & MSG_PEEK;
 	bool rx_more = false;
 	bool released = true;
+	bool nodata = false;
 	bool zc_capable;
 
 	if (unlikely(flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE))
@@ -1858,6 +1859,16 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 		struct tls_decrypt_arg darg;
 		int to_decrypt, chunk;
 
+		/* A run of empty records advances neither loop bound, and
+		 * tls_rx_rec_wait() tests for a signal only after it sleeps.
+		 */
+		if (nodata && signal_pending(current)) {
+			long timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
+
+			err = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
+			goto recv_end;
+		}
+
 		err = tls_rx_rec_wait(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
 				      released, !!(decrypted + copied));
 		if (err <= 0)
@@ -1910,6 +1921,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 		/* TLS 1.3 may have updated the length by more than overhead */
 		rxm = strp_msg(darg.skb);
 		chunk = rxm->full_len;
+		nodata = !chunk;
 		tls_rx_rec_done(ctx);
 
 		if (!darg.zc) {

-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-01 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01 22:41 [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net/tls: Receive-path fixes for zero-length data records Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] tls: bound consecutive no-data records in tls_sw_read_sock() Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:44     ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-10-05 23:22   ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] tls: check for a pending signal after an empty record netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:45     ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/8] tls: consume empty data records in tls_sw_splice_read() Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:45     ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/8] tls: honor O_NONBLOCK " Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:46     ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/8] tls: consume empty data records in tls_sw_recvmsg() Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06 15:47     ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] selftests: tls: add peek and splice coverage for zero-length records Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/8] selftests: tls: skip the zero_len tests when TLS is unavailable Chuck Lever
2026-10-05 23:22   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-01 22:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] selftests: tls: cover splice on a nonblocking socket Chuck Lever
2026-10-01 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net/tls: Receive-path fixes for zero-length data records netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-02 15:30   ` Chuck Lever
2026-10-04  6:36 ` Qingfang Deng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261001-tls-follow-on-v2-2-2dd1947bb642@kernel.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox