Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
To: fw@strlen.de
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, phil@nwl.cc,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: conntrack: avoid recursive master destruction
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 2026 14:39:41 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002053941.1132097-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ar6yM0h2zdVUU4rt@strlen.de>

Thanks for taking a look.

I think this check is reasonable for CTA_TUPLE_MASTER, but it does not seem
to make master chains impossible by itself.  There is another master writer
in init_conntrack(): expectation fulfillment assigns exp->master to the new
conntrack.

In particular, ctnetlink_glue_attach_expect() can attach an expectation
from an NFQUEUE verdict and set assign_helper.  The expected child then has
both a master and a helper, so it can serve as the master of another
userspace-helper expectation.  That path does not pass through the proposed
check and has no cumulative depth bound.

This helper propagation was intentionally restored by dcb0f9aefdd6
("netfilter: nf_conntrack_expect: restore helper propagation via
expectation") for SIP, H.323 and userspace helpers.  Restricting all nested
masters would therefore need a wider helper/expectation compatibility
change.

For that reason I think nf_ct_destroy() still needs to be stack-safe.  The
creation-time check could be added separately if nested conntrackd restore
should also be rejected.  Does that match your intended invariant?

Thanks,
Daehyeon

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-02  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01 18:02 [PATCH net] netfilter: conntrack: avoid recursive master destruction Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-01 19:19 ` Florian Westphal
2026-10-02  5:39   ` Daehyeon Ko [this message]
2026-10-02  9:56     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-02  9:55   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-02  9:55 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-02 16:56 ` [PATCH v2 net] netfilter: conntrack: reject nested ctnetlink master chains Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-02 16:58   ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-02 17:35   ` Florian Westphal
2026-10-06  7:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-07  1:33     ` Daehyeon Ko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261002053941.1132097-1-4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --to=4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox