Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net] net: skbuff: don't copy alloc_cpu in skb header copies
@ 2026-10-12 12:45 Carolina Jubran
  2026-10-12 15:26 ` Björn Töpel
  2026-10-12 16:21 ` Eric Dumazet
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Carolina Jubran @ 2026-10-12 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
  Cc: Simon Horman, Jason Xing, Kuniyuki Iwashima,
	Björn Töpel, Jiayuan Chen, netdev, linux-kernel,
	Carolina Jubran, Dragos Tatulea

Commit 68822bdf76f1 ("net: generalize skb freeing deferral to
per-cpu lists") added alloc_cpu to struct sk_buff and placed it in the
headers group copied by __copy_skb_header().

This is wrong for newly allocated skbs. For example, skb_segment()
allocates a new skb and records the current CPU in alloc_cpu, but
__copy_skb_header() overwrites it with the value from the original skb.

If the original skb was allocated on another CPU, the segment may later
be treated as remotely allocated and unnecessarily deferred there when
it is freed.

Move alloc_cpu out of the headers group so it is preserved across
header copies. Initialize it explicitly in skb_clone(), which allocates
the skb object directly instead of going through __alloc_skb().

This was discovered while investigating a throughput regression with
software IPsec. The load used 512 IPsec tunnels carrying traffic over
VXLAN, with 512 parallel iperf3 flows and an MTU of 4500.

Before the fix:

  16.09%  queued_spin_lock_slowpath
             |
             --15.90%--_raw_spin_lock_irqsave
                       |
                       --9.37%--__slab_free
                                 kfree
                                 skb_release_data
                                 napi_consume_skb
                                 mlx5e_poll_tx_cq

After the fix:

   6.84%  queued_spin_lock_slowpath
             |
             --6.57%--_raw_spin_lock_irqsave
                      |
                      --5.00%--__slab_free
                                kfree
                                skb_release_data
                                napi_consume_skb
                                mlx5e_poll_tx_cq

Fixes: 68822bdf76f1 ("net: generalize skb freeing deferral to per-cpu lists")
Signed-off-by: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
---
 include/linux/skbuff.h | 2 +-
 net/core/skbuff.c      | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index a3ff380d43f01..2d5277765939f 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -963,6 +963,7 @@ struct sk_buff {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SKB_EXTENSIONS
 	__u8			active_extensions;
 #endif
+	u16                     alloc_cpu;
 
 	/* Fields enclosed in headers group are copied
 	 * using a single memcpy() in __copy_skb_header()
@@ -1036,7 +1037,6 @@ struct sk_buff {
 	__u16			tc_index;	/* traffic control index */
 #endif
 
-	u16			alloc_cpu;
 
 	union {
 		__wsum		csum;
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 41beaf625421a..3d82eb87f4582 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -1593,7 +1593,6 @@ static void __copy_skb_header(struct sk_buff *new, const struct sk_buff *old)
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
 	CHECK_SKB_FIELD(napi_id);
 #endif
-	CHECK_SKB_FIELD(alloc_cpu);
 #ifdef CONFIG_XPS
 	CHECK_SKB_FIELD(sender_cpu);
 #endif
@@ -1618,6 +1617,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *__skb_clone(struct sk_buff *n, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	C(len);
 	C(data_len);
 	C(mac_len);
+	C(alloc_cpu);
 	n->hdr_len = skb->nohdr ? skb_headroom(skb) : skb->hdr_len;
 	n->cloned = 1;
 	n->nohdr = 0;
-- 
2.38.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net: skbuff: don't copy alloc_cpu in skb header copies
  2026-10-12 12:45 [PATCH net] net: skbuff: don't copy alloc_cpu in skb header copies Carolina Jubran
@ 2026-10-12 15:26 ` Björn Töpel
  2026-10-12 16:21 ` Eric Dumazet
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Björn Töpel @ 2026-10-12 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Carolina Jubran, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
	Paolo Abeni
  Cc: Simon Horman, Jason Xing, Kuniyuki Iwashima, Jiayuan Chen, netdev,
	linux-kernel, Carolina Jubran, Dragos Tatulea

Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com> writes:

> Commit 68822bdf76f1 ("net: generalize skb freeing deferral to
> per-cpu lists") added alloc_cpu to struct sk_buff and placed it in the
> headers group copied by __copy_skb_header().
>
> This is wrong for newly allocated skbs. For example, skb_segment()
> allocates a new skb and records the current CPU in alloc_cpu, but
> __copy_skb_header() overwrites it with the value from the original skb.
>
> If the original skb was allocated on another CPU, the segment may later
> be treated as remotely allocated and unnecessarily deferred there when
> it is freed.
>
> Move alloc_cpu out of the headers group so it is preserved across
> header copies. Initialize it explicitly in skb_clone(), which allocates
> the skb object directly instead of going through __alloc_skb().
>
> This was discovered while investigating a throughput regression with
> software IPsec. The load used 512 IPsec tunnels carrying traffic over
> VXLAN, with 512 parallel iperf3 flows and an MTU of 4500.
>
> Before the fix:
>
>   16.09%  queued_spin_lock_slowpath
>              |
>              --15.90%--_raw_spin_lock_irqsave
>                        |
>                        --9.37%--__slab_free
>                                  kfree
>                                  skb_release_data
>                                  napi_consume_skb
>                                  mlx5e_poll_tx_cq
>
> After the fix:
>
>    6.84%  queued_spin_lock_slowpath
>              |
>              --6.57%--_raw_spin_lock_irqsave
>                       |
>                       --5.00%--__slab_free
>                                 kfree
>                                 skb_release_data
>                                 napi_consume_skb
>                                 mlx5e_poll_tx_cq
>
> Fixes: 68822bdf76f1 ("net: generalize skb freeing deferral to per-cpu lists")
> Signed-off-by: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>

Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net: skbuff: don't copy alloc_cpu in skb header copies
  2026-10-12 12:45 [PATCH net] net: skbuff: don't copy alloc_cpu in skb header copies Carolina Jubran
  2026-10-12 15:26 ` Björn Töpel
@ 2026-10-12 16:21 ` Eric Dumazet
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2026-10-12 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Carolina Jubran
  Cc: David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman,
	Jason Xing, Kuniyuki Iwashima, Björn Töpel,
	Jiayuan Chen, netdev, linux-kernel, Dragos Tatulea

Le lun. 12 oct. 2026 à 14:48, Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com> a écrit :
>
> Commit 68822bdf76f1 ("net: generalize skb freeing deferral to
> per-cpu lists") added alloc_cpu to struct sk_buff and placed it in the
> headers group copied by __copy_skb_header().
>
> This is wrong for newly allocated skbs. For example, skb_segment()
> allocates a new skb and records the current CPU in alloc_cpu, but
> __copy_skb_header() overwrites it with the value from the original skb.
>
> If the original skb was allocated on another CPU, the segment may later
> be treated as remotely allocated and unnecessarily deferred there when
> it is freed.
>
> Move alloc_cpu out of the headers group so it is preserved across
> header copies. Initialize it explicitly in skb_clone(), which allocates
> the skb object directly instead of going through __alloc_skb().
>
> This was discovered while investigating a throughput regression with
> software IPsec. The load used 512 IPsec tunnels carrying traffic over
> VXLAN, with 512 parallel iperf3 flows and an MTU of 4500.
>
> Before the fix:
>
>   16.09%  queued_spin_lock_slowpath
>              |
>              --15.90%--_raw_spin_lock_irqsave
>                        |
>                        --9.37%--__slab_free
>                                  kfree
>                                  skb_release_data
>                                  napi_consume_skb
>                                  mlx5e_poll_tx_cq
>
> After the fix:
>
>    6.84%  queued_spin_lock_slowpath
>              |
>              --6.57%--_raw_spin_lock_irqsave
>                       |
>                       --5.00%--__slab_free
>                                 kfree
>                                 skb_release_data
>                                 napi_consume_skb
>                                 mlx5e_poll_tx_cq
>
> Fixes: 68822bdf76f1 ("net: generalize skb freeing deferral to per-cpu lists")
> Signed-off-by: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/skbuff.h | 2 +-
>  net/core/skbuff.c      | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index a3ff380d43f01..2d5277765939f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -963,6 +963,7 @@ struct sk_buff {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SKB_EXTENSIONS
>         __u8                    active_extensions;
>  #endif
> +       u16                     alloc_cpu;

spaces instead of tab here.

I had on my plate a better placement of alloc_cpu, end, tail...
I would move alloc_cpu _after_ headers group.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-12 16:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-12 12:45 [PATCH net] net: skbuff: don't copy alloc_cpu in skb header copies Carolina Jubran
2026-10-12 15:26 ` Björn Töpel
2026-10-12 16:21 ` Eric Dumazet

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox