Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rongguang Wei <clementwei90@163.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowangio@gmail.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	Rongguang Wei <weirongguang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH net v7 0/2] tun: fix re-attaching the socket filter
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 17:22:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261023092239.186665-1-clementwei90@163.com> (raw)

From: Rongguang Wei <weirongguang@kylinos.cn>

This is v7 of the series that fixes attaching a queue to a TAP device which
re-installs the socket filter of a persistent device.

Patch 1 keeps a copy of the program in the kernel when it is configured,
instead of reading tun->fprog from user space again on every later attach,
and fixes the inverted error check in tun_attach(). The two changes are
one patch on purpose: with only the kernel copy every re-attach returns 0
without publishing the queue, and with only the check fixed a re-attach
that used to succeed without a filter starts to fail. IFF_NOFILTER keeps
working and is no longer needed to work around the re-attach bug. The
program is verified with bpf_prog_validate_classic() when it is copied in,
so a program that no verifier accepts is rejected even when no queue is
attached.

Patch 2 adds selftests: it re-attaches a queue after the buffer the program
was copied from was made unreadable, attaches a second queue from a fresh
socket to check that the filter is rebuilt from the kernel copy, and checks
that a TUNATTACHFILTER with a bad length or bad instructions keeps the
saved program, plus the ways to attach a queue without a filter.

Thanks to Willem de Bruijn for the reviews, and to the CI reviews for
the comments they raised.

Rongguang Wei (2):
  tun: keep a kernel copy of the socket filter program
  selftests: net: add TAP socket filter attach tests

---
v7:
  - validate the program with bpf_prog_validate_classic() in
    tun_copy_filter(), so an invalid program is rejected even when no
    queue is attached
  - fix the kernel-doc of sk_attach_filter_kern(): drop a reference to a
    function that does not exist and complete the Return section
  - make bpf_prog_validate_classic() reject a program whose length is out
    of range, like bpf_prog_create() does, and say so in its kernel-doc
  - document why the filter is dropped when a later step of tun_attach()
    fails, and why filter_accept[] has three instructions
  - selftests: add a case for a rejected program with valid length and
    bad instructions
v6:
  - add description for return value of sk_attach_filter_kern(); no code
    change is involved
  - https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aa6f8ef9-56d8-4edb-9ae2-d3f3b7dc1721@163.com/
v5:
  - add kernel-doc for sk_attach_filter_kern() describing what the missing
    original program means for SO_GET_FILTER and sock_diag
  - mention in the message that a rejected header now leaves the installed
    filter alone
  - fix the wording of the mprotect() comment and note what the IFF_NOFILTER
    and TUNGETFILTER checks in the re-attach test
  - https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261012021113.45939-1-clementwei90@163.com/
v4:
  - merge the kernel copy and the error check into one patch, so that no
    step of the series turns a re-attach into a silent no-op or into a new
    failure
  - charge the kernel copy to the caller's memory cgroup
  - selftests: check that the queue is attached again, and attach a new
    queue to see that the filter was installed from the kernel copy
  - https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261003063859.136895-1-clementwei90@163.com/
v3:
  - reorder: the kernel copy of the program comes before the corrected
    error check
  - add sk_attach_filter_kern() in the patch that first uses it
  - address the review of the selftests
  - https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260930080746.135017-1-clementwei90@163.com/
v2:
  - roll back the filter attach when a later step of tun_attach() fails
  - keep a copy of the program in the kernel, so that a later attach does
    not depend on the address space of the process that set the filter
  - add selftests for the re-attach and for a rejected TUNATTACHFILTER
  - https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260929093712.131096-1-clementwei90@163.com/
v1:
  - https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260923025653.59348-1-clementwei90@163.com/
---
 drivers/net/tun.c                 |  76 +++++++++-
 include/linux/filter.h            |   2 +
 net/core/filter.c                 |  62 +++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c | 223 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)


base-commit: 7be4bc52fd9e0e55dc9a2e0232b89427d2c4b614
-- 
2.43.0


No virus found
		Checked by Hillstone Network AntiVirus


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-23  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-23  9:22 Rongguang Wei [this message]
2026-10-23  9:22 ` [PATCH net v7 1/2] tun: keep a kernel copy of the socket filter program Rongguang Wei
2026-10-23 22:21   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-27 10:09   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-27 14:05     ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-23  9:22 ` [PATCH net v7 2/2] selftests: net: add TAP socket filter attach tests Rongguang Wei
2026-10-23 22:22   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-27 10:09   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261023092239.186665-1-clementwei90@163.com \
    --to=clementwei90@163.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=weirongguang@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox