From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Rongguang Wei <clementwei90@163.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowangio@gmail.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
Rongguang Wei <weirongguang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v7 2/2] selftests: net: add TAP socket filter attach tests
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:22:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.71ffde9540c8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023092239.186665-3-clementwei90@163.com>
Rongguang Wei wrote:
> From: Rongguang Wei <weirongguang@kylinos.cn>
>
> reattach_filter_without_user_buffer() attaches a filter, makes the buffer
> the program was copied from unreadable, detaches the queue and attaches it
> again. It then attaches a second queue from a fresh socket, which starts
> without a filter of its own, so a clear IFF_NOFILTER shows that the filter
> was installed again from the kernel copy.
>
> attach_filter_bad_len_keeps_program() checks that a TUNATTACHFILTER with a
> bad length leaves the installed program and the filter state that
> TUNGETIFF reports alone, and that a queue attached afterwards still gets
> the filter. attach_filter_bad_prog_keeps_program() refuses a program with
> a valid length and instructions that bpf_check_classic() rejects, and
> checks that the program installed before is left in place.
>
> attach_filter_nofilter_flag() and detach_filter_clears_reattach() cover the
> ways to attach a queue without a filter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rongguang Wei <weirongguang@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 9:22 [PATCH net v7 0/2] tun: fix re-attaching the socket filter Rongguang Wei
2026-10-23 9:22 ` [PATCH net v7 1/2] tun: keep a kernel copy of the socket filter program Rongguang Wei
2026-10-23 22:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-27 10:09 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-23 9:22 ` [PATCH net v7 2/2] selftests: net: add TAP socket filter attach tests Rongguang Wei
2026-10-23 22:22 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-10-27 10:09 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.71ffde9540c8@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=clementwei90@163.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weirongguang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox