From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@mandelbit.com>
To: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowangio@gmail.com
Cc: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@mandelbit.com>,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/3] tun: trim per-packet work on the write path
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 16:06:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112150612.3866546-1-antonio@mandelbit.com> (raw)
Profiling a link-bonding daemon on an embedded router (Cortex-A7), which
injects every packet with a write() to a tun device, showed tun doing
per-packet work its packets do not need:
1. a flow dissector run, only to set the transport header
2. a BH-disabled RCU section, only to check for an XDP program, which
only TAP devices can have
3. the parsing of an all-zero virtio-net header without IFF_VNET_HDR
Per 1400-byte packet written and dropped at the raw table, instruction
counts (qemu -icount) drop by 6.5% for 1 (Cortex-A7), 2.3% for 2 and
1.6% for 3 (x86). The tun selftests pass.
Antonio Quartulli (3):
tun: don't probe the transport header of packets written by userspace
tun: don't disable BHs for the XDP program check of every packet
tun: skip the virtio-net header parsing without IFF_VNET_HDR
drivers/net/tun.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.56.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 15:06 Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2026-11-12 15:06 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] tun: don't probe the transport header of packets written by userspace Antonio Quartulli
2026-11-12 15:06 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] tun: don't disable BHs for the XDP program check of every packet Antonio Quartulli
2026-11-12 15:06 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] tun: skip the virtio-net header parsing without IFF_VNET_HDR Antonio Quartulli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261112150612.3866546-1-antonio@mandelbit.com \
--to=antonio@mandelbit.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox