From: Max Staudt <max@enpas.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] can: can327: fix snprintf() limit in can327_handle_prompt()
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:19:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22e388b5-37a1-40a6-bb70-4784e29451ed@enpas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c896ba5d-7147-4978-9e25-86cfd88ff9dc@stanley.mountain>
Hi Dan,
On 11/14/24 18:03, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This code is printing hex values to the &local_txbuf buffer and it's
> using the snprintf() function to try prevent buffer overflows. The
> problem is that it's not passing the correct limit to the snprintf()
> function so the limit doesn't do anything. On each iteration we print
> two digits so the remaining size should also decrease by two, but
> instead it passes the sizeof() the entire buffer each time.
D'oh, silly mistake. Thank you for finding it!
IMHO the correct fix isn't further counting and checking within the
snprintf loop. Instead, the buffer is correctly sized for a payload of
up to 8 bytes, and what we should do is to initially establish that
frame->len is indeed no larger than 8 bytes. So, something like
if (frame->len > 8) {
netdev_err(elm->dev, "The CAN stack handed us a frame with len > 8
bytes. Dropped packet.\n");
}
This check would go into can327_netdev_start_xmit(), and then a comment
at your current patch's location to remind of this. Also, snprintf() can
be simplified to sprintf(), since it is fully predictable in this case.
It's also possible that the CAN stack already checks frame->len, in
which case I'd just add comments to can327. I haven't dug into the code
now - maybe the maintainers know?
I can whip something up next week.
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-14 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 9:03 [PATCH net] can: can327: fix snprintf() limit in can327_handle_prompt() Dan Carpenter
2024-11-14 9:19 ` Max Staudt [this message]
2024-11-14 9:26 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-11-14 9:29 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-11-14 10:11 ` Max Staudt
2024-11-14 9:34 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-14 9:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-11-14 12:35 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-14 13:34 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2024-11-14 14:54 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-14 15:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-11-14 15:24 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-14 15:42 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-11-19 0:48 ` Max Staudt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22e388b5-37a1-40a6-bb70-4784e29451ed@enpas.org \
--to=max@enpas.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox