From: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
vitaly.lifshits@intel.com, dima.ruinskiy@intel.com,
davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
sasha.neftin@intel.com, naamax.meir@linux.intel.com
Cc: todd.e.brandt@intel.com, dmummenschanz@web.de,
rui.zhang@intel.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, horms@kernel.org,
regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:43:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3359c6cb-cd2a-4738-8907-5018fa3e9606@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ec4337f-7bf4-442d-8eca-128e528fde2a@molgen.mpg.de>
On 6/10/24 14:36, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Hui,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
>
> Am 10.06.24 um 03:32 schrieb Hui Wang:
>> This reverts commit bfd546a552e140b0a4c8a21527c39d6d21addb28
>>
>> Commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of
>> enable_ulp function") introduces system suspend failure on some
>> ethernet cards, at the moment, the pciid of the affected ethernet
>> cards include [8086:15b8] and [8086:15bc].
>>
>> About the regression the commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force
>
> … regression introduced by commit …
Got it.
>
>> SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function") tried to fix, looks like
>> it is not trivial to fix, we need to find a better way to resolve it.
>
> Please send a revert for commit 861e8086029e (e1000e: move force SMBUS
> from enable ulp function to avoid PHY loss issue), present since Linux
> v6.9-rc3 and not containing enough information in the commit messsage,
> so we have a proper baseline. (That’s also why I originally suggested
> to split it into two commits (revert + your change).)
In regards to reverting the commit 861e8086029e (e1000e: move force
SMBUS from enable ulp function to avoid PHY loss issue), the author is
Vitaly, let him evaluate how to act.
Thanks.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 1:32 [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function" Hui Wang
2024-06-10 6:36 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-10 14:14 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-06-11 5:45 ` Hui Wang
2024-06-11 5:43 ` Hui Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3359c6cb-cd2a-4738-8907-5018fa3e9606@canonical.com \
--to=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dima.ruinskiy@intel.com \
--cc=dmummenschanz@web.de \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=naamax.meir@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sasha.neftin@intel.com \
--cc=todd.e.brandt@intel.com \
--cc=vitaly.lifshits@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox